Please continue the discussions of Interview candidates here, after SC Judgement, As previous page & forum has reached high number of comments which makes page navigation difficult.
(Discussions Continued in this link)
Advertisements
UPSC IAS Civil Service Exam Notes & Material, APPSC Groups Notification and Material Telugu Medium, Andhra Economy notes, Group 1 Mains Notification and Results, APPSC Group 2, Aptitude & Reasoning for Bank PO Clerical Competitive Exams, General Awareness Quiz online, Current Affairs 2013 and 2014 Notes, Group 1 Mains Notes, GK for APPSC Blog, Modern history, Medieval history Ancient history notes Geography notes, Banking awareness Previous papers
Pages
- Home
- World Geography(Telugu)
- Biology
- Physics & Chemistry
- APPSC Material for Group 1
- Quiz on General Studies
- APPSC Guidance
- Junior Lecturers Prev.Papers
- Ancient History(Short Notes)
- Medieval History(Short Notes)
- Modern India(Class Notes)
- Indian Constitution(Class Notes-EM)
- Indian History
- APPSC G1 Mains Forum
- Indian Polity
- General Awareness
- Group 1 Mains - Paper 4
- World Geography
- General Geography(Class Notes-TM)
- AP Geography
- Quantitative Aptitude
- Group 1 Mains Cancellation Issue
- Andhra History(Class Notes)
- Andhra Economy
- Indian History Bits (TM)
- Chat Box
- Biology(TM) Class Notes
- Indian Constitution(TM) Class Notes
- 60+APPSC Previous Papers
- Data Interpretation
- World History
- Indian Constitution Quiz(110)
- Physics MCQ Quiz's
- Chemistry MCQ Quiz's
- Biology MCQ Quiz's
- Group 1 Previous Papers(All)
- GS Reviewer(50-Sets)
- Essays for Mains
- AEE Material
- SSC CGL Material
Advertisements
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
821 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 601 – 800 of 821 Newer› Newest»supreme court website lo case status pending ani vastumdi.Interviewed candidates pls come and speak out.lets fight for our justice.
ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25157/2013
(From the judgement and order dated 26/07/2013 in WP No.2392/2013 of the
HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT HYDERABAD)
ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
K PRASAD AND ANR. Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and
with prayer for interim relief)
WITH
SLP(C) NO. 25209 of 2013
(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and
with prayer for interim relief and office report)
Date:16/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shyam Divan,Sr.Adv.
Mrs. Anjani Aiyagari,Adv.
Mr. G. Vivekanand,Adv.
Mr. Vinod A. Bobde,Sr.Adv.
Mr. G. Vivekanand,Adv.
Mrs. Anjani Aiyagari,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. H.S. Gururaja Rao,Sr.Adv.
Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv.
Ms. Bina Madhavan,Adv.
Ms. Praseena E. Joseph,Adv.
Mr. Shivendra Singh,Adv.
for M/S. Lawyer'S Knit & Co.,Advs.
Mr. G.N. Reddy,Adv.
Mr. B. Debojit,Adv.
Mr. Bala Shivudu M.,Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
The matters are adjourned for one week.
(A.S. BISHT) (SNEH LATA SHARMA)
COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
someone eariler commented that "Case vesinavadu aspirent kadani supreme court teerpu cheptundi. Coaching centres lakshalu karchu petti case gelichayi. Vade aspirent aite 6 questions delete cheyinchadu. Natteta munchadanike coaching centres. Remains to all is a justice think one and all', wht kind of person you are? asalu court lo em jarigindo theliyakundaa picchodilaa comment chesthaventra fool.
asalu neelanti vedhavala sollu kaburla valle memu anni aashalu pettukunnaaam. neeku antha kovvu unte velli sc lo fight chei, ikkada kaadu.
6 questions delete cheyamani ekkada, evaru adagaledu. ee option iccinidi appsc on august 8th. SC has gone with the same.
without any authentic info, how can u blame someone who are fighting for their own cause/? we also agree that interviewed candidates are unlucky this time.
Yes, kasinath. you are correct. our system and appsc is like this just bcoz of such kind of idiots. They don't what and how to talk and still hope to compete for top coveted posts like Gr-1.
pity for interviewed candidates. but appsc will learn a lesson from this and won't commit such mistakes in future.
6 questions to be deleted are:
1. Tirupati
2. No.of deaths due to natural disasters
3. Tubes used for heamodialysis
4. Disaster prone states no.
5. Squint: Squeeze
6. Nile: Amazon.
APPSC would delete these 6 questions and re-draw the merit list for 144 questions and then go ahead for mains and interviews.
There is no chance left for us,interviewed candidates except to keep our hopes alive and prepare hard for mains.
all the best, friends...
i also feel that there is no chance left for us interviewed candidates. Already we were made fools by filing the case. Has anyone checked the petition in SC on our behalf? what is written in there? what has been sought? I think the advocates, so called leaders and great thinkers in this blog have fooled us.
some of our friends have been cautioning all of us with regard to the case filed by interviewed candidates that there is no base in the case and those who collected money have been fooling us. The same thing was opined by SC and has been reflected in its order. I heard that it didn't even let the advocate speak on behalf of the interviewed candidates.
In such scenario, how can we expect that justice would come in our favour?
if ur true, den v shud take back our money from those collected for filingcase for interviewedcandidates. they said lawyer charges are heavy. but their work is heavy. lets fight for this.
TEM NO.11-A COURT NO.11 SECTION XIIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25157/2013
(From the judgement and order dated 26/07/2013 in WP No.2392/2013 of The
HIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD)
ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
K PRASAD AND ANR. Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment and
prayer for interim relief )
WITH SLP(C) NO. 25209 of 2013
(With prayer for interim relief and office report)
Date: 08/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shyam Diwan,Sr.Adv.
Mr. Pramod Swarup,Adv.
Mr. G.Vivekanand,Adv.
Mrs. Anjani Aiyagari,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. SUK Sagar,Adv.
Ms. Bina Madhavan,Adv.
Ms. Praseena E.Joseph,Adv.
Mr. Shivendra Singh,Adv.
Mr. Sinha Shrey Nikhilesh,Adv.for
M/S. Lawyer'S Knit & Co
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
In SLP(C)No. 25157/2013
Taken on Board.
Heard Mr. Shyam Diwan, learned senior counsel for
the petitioner.
-2-
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on
16.8.2013. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
Liberty to serve the Standing Counsel for the State
of Andhra Pradesh.
In the meantime, Mr. Diwan to take instructions as
to whether some of the questions which prima facie appear to be
problematic will be deleted and also avert the further course of
action.
By way of an interim order we direct that the report
from the Union Public Service Commission, as directed by the High
Court, may not be called for in the meantime.
In SLP(C)No. 25209/2013
Taken on Board.
Heard Mr. Shyam Diwan, learned senior counsel for the
petitioner and Ms. Bina Madhavan, learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the respondent no.1.
Issue notice to respondent no. 2-State of Andhra
Pradesh which may be served on the Standing Counsel for the State
of Andhra Pradesh. Same interim direction as in the connected
matter i.e. SLP(C)NO. 25157/2013.
List both the matters on 16.8.2013 in Court.
[SUMAN WADHWA] [SNEH LATA SHARMA]
AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER
in all probabilities , notification wud be cancelled (source : andhrabhoomi) appsc is not in a position to conduct exam again.
i think the reason behind cancelling of 6 qustions by SC is tht its not trusting answers given by appsc. its committee rather than giving correct answers tried to justify the mistakes in HC. thtswhy HC ordered UPSC commiittee. now SC did the right thing in not trusting appsc again.
but its a loss to those candidates who may hav answered those 6 questions correctly.
ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25157/2013
(From the judgement and order dated 26/07/2013 in WP No.2392/2013 of the
HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT HYDERABAD)
ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
K PRASAD AND ANR. Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and
with prayer for interim relief)
WITH
SLP(C) NO. 25209 of 2013
(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and
with prayer for interim relief and office report)
Date:16/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shyam Divan,Sr.Adv.
Mrs. Anjani Aiyagari,Adv.
Mr. G. Vivekanand,Adv.
Mr. Vinod A. Bobde,Sr.Adv.
Mr. G. Vivekanand,Adv.
Mrs. Anjani Aiyagari,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. H.S. Gururaja Rao,Sr.Adv.
Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv.
Ms. Bina Madhavan,Adv.
Ms. Praseena E. Joseph,Adv.
Mr. Shivendra Singh,Adv.
for M/S. Lawyer'S Knit & Co.,Advs.
Mr. G.N. Reddy,Adv.
Mr. B. Debojit,Adv.
Mr. Bala Shivudu M.,Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
The matters are adjourned for one week.
(A.S. BISHT) (SNEH LATA SHARMA)
COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
there won't be any fight or justice after the order of supremecourt. if someone says so, he is playing with us. lets not give money for anyone who tells that he'll fight for our cause.enough is enough, lets get rid of this and prepare for exams.
During the course of arguments held yesterday, appsc advocate has accepted the errors and requested SC that it will abide what Highcourt will say as per the report of UPSC on these 6 questions. He even pleaded the court that justice would be done to those two person who filed the case. (Source: andhrajyothi) But keeping in mind, the interests of all those who have written mains but cudn't qualify, SC has given such judgment.
None has asked to delete the questions except appsc on 16th august.
Now, it's our fate to accept the truth.
will appsc publish the markslist this time along with merit list? then only, cutoff is validated.
kudos to those who won the case. They hv taught a lesson to PSC. Let's hope that it won't commit such mistakes in future.
I heard that it is first time in India that Mains exam has been cancelled. Is it true, friends?
now, this judgment will be a bible for appsc. and caution it whenever they go for conducting any exam in future.
Plz dont believe any cheaters who try to collect money again for fighting the case in SC. arguing against a SC order is not a small thing. better to prepare for re-mains. today i read in some paper tht appsc unofficially saying tht it will cancel the notification in this situation. best option for u guys is go n meet the appsc and scold them up and down.
personally i am fed up of appsc.rather i give ibps exam and get out of this mess as soon as possible. trusting appsc will cost us our future. if state is divided , thr wont be any new notification until 2 years. if division dont occur , thn thr r chances of noti before elections !!!! all the best to evryone.
first we shud find those cheaters who already collected money for filing the case in supremecourt. what's the point in filing the case there, when highcourt itself didn't take up the issue? they filled their pockets with our money. i hope they already knew this kind of judgment. then, why conducted meetings with all interviewed candidates.
Hi vardhan, what you said is 100 % tru but i dont understand meaning of sentence "some body said "But keeping in mind, the interests of all those who have written mains but cudn't qualify, SC has given such judgment....."
what interests do people who have already written mains are lost? I dont understand.
It is we who missed because of faulty key. Again few of missed candidates may loose chance as 6 questions,which are bieng deleted might have been answered correctly, will not be counted and there is chance that they may loose their oppurtunity now also. This APPSC always creates a mess.
Hope those candidates wont reach SC with a new case that SC rather than cancelling questions should order SC for correct answers and re evaluate list one more time. Then we need to be ready for third mains also and so on.
Lets us prepare well and write mains. All the best
iam sorry, friend. i just meant prelims written but cudn't qualify candidates only due to the faulty key. it was a typing error.
all the best.
What is the fate of a missed candidate, who has chosen correct answers for all or majority of 6 cancelled question, not qualified now also,as 6 question cancellation rather to ordering for revision of key with correct answers.
Is there any chance that they also approach court with a petition that - rather to cancel question, revise the key with correct answers.
My cousin is facing this problem, can any body suggest ideas, so that she may also get the opportunity to write mains!.
the judgement serves no one's purpose...in my view not only the interviewed candidates but each and every aspirant's purpose is defeated bcoz we can't expect exam in the near future.....really great loss.
Ultimate winner is "Bad Luck" of all aspirants especially interviewed candidates
well said...the judgement served no one's purpose...
can any one know when will appsc relaeases new merit list?
notification will be cancelled by appsc. it is not in a position to conduct exams at this stage.
yes appsc wil not conduct xam again...denne rakshasa anandam antaru aa 6 questions kosam fight chesi 600 mandi ni muncharu bt at the same time questions delete ai melo chala mandi munigaru..ds s fact..ds s called cherapaku ra chededavu..ee list bitiki vachuntey atleast 300 mandiki annam dorkedi noti dagari koodu lakkunaru....
re mains conduct chesi paruvu pogattukovadam ye psc ki ishtam undadu..they will file review if interview candidates are allowed then its ok if not dy will simply cancel notification..dn we can all do bhajana till 2015
baga cheppav brother but aa bhajana not til 2015 it cna extend also...kotha psc form kavalanna joint psc pettalanna...bagane time padthadi...
internal sources saidappsc s taking this issue as their p cancel ds prestige issue if they cnaot go ahead even after review they will cnacel ds notifcation and go back to sleep.case avaru gelcharoo...avaru odipoyarooo? meke teliyali
key tappundani poradina vaallu 6 qsns delete ela cheyanichharu?marks perigi cutoff ela cross chestaru?
seriously,no one won the case now as remains is not possible.with no sin,interviewed ones are at loss.
Better Appsc cancel the notification,So that, we can save our 2 years precious and free from mental torture.
key tappu vundani poradina vallu ma 2 yrs kastaanni boodida paalu chesaru.remains to all kakunda valla varuku mains pettichukovalsimdi.see the result now,everyone will loose as fresh mains will not happen.
anthe ga ds s indian psychology manaku oka kannu pothe avthala valla 2 kallu povali...cheppandi bro meru fight chesina cause correct ee..bt wt was d fault of interview candidates..prelims pass avadame ma tappa...or malli mains pettleni condition undi ani tlsi kuda case poradina melanti nyaya nipunulatho...ee exam raydam ma tappe
yes,u r right.no one win the case.
As sn interviewed one,I too think its better to cancel notification instead of playing for 2 yrs with the lives of innocent aspirants like me.
I am telling this with my personal experience after interviews sc cancelled.
now,fresh mains conducting is not possible and we will be looking at appsc with hopesmatladt,it will show us bare hand.
What r u talking, friends? hv they filed the case against the interviewed ones? Did they ever say a single word against u/ they fought for their own cause. Then wat's so frustrating u?
They didn't even ask for deletion, instead pleaded for revision of key with correct answers. It was appsc which put forward this option whereby the court has given such judgment.
Okavela meeru missed candidates list lo undi unte vaallani pogidevaaru. meeko nyaayam, migathaa vaallako nyaayamaa? how can u fit into the position like Group-1 with such kind of attitude. Pls control ur emotions. Everyone knows that it is painful. but v shud digest dat.
someone said earlier that they should have asked for conducting mains for them only. How can you get such ideas my frnd? is it possible to conduct mains for only those 2 persons?
Think wise and talk nice...
It is 606 Vs 1,40,000+/-606. Just see the difference. Who will weigh more? losing at interview stage is painful, but think from otherside. thousands of candidates hv missed the oppportunity due to faulty key and if they get a chance, why r u so impatient??
If you are so hard working, and honest, then give a try next time. U'll definitely succeed. Y r u guys so apprehensive about ur own caliber?
Instead of going to court, u shud hv gone to appsc and slapped on their faces for such mistakes.
that's very interesting point that inspite of knowing dat in present situation in state.. mains cant b conducted..these people pleaded for re-mains..
see nw what is the fate..every one is suffering..
who said, noone wind the case. hundreds of people like us have won the case. at least we get a chance to write this time. what is your problem? most of us cuold not go to courts, but somehow the judgement came. let us all work hard and prepare for mains.
is ur talent limited to one instance. if not, then try this time with more efforts. let us ask APpsc to conduct the exam soon of the sake of all of us.
hey frnd, it is the court which said on 16th that appsc shall not think about second mains. and accordingly, it has given judgment. Then whose fault is this? if you are the loser, would you have asked the court to conduct the exam only for you. how silly u r talking?
first of all, you say there won't be any fresh mains to all.
now you say it is not possible due to present situation.
Don't you think the secretariat or assembly or any other constitutional body is not working presently?
then what is stopping psc to conduct the exams based upon the orders of SC. Can anyone go against SC orders? Think twice and then comment.,
i dont understand that few people are in apprehension dat appsc is in the position to conduct mains again..
are u not ashamed of writing mains again?
how many times u write?
hw many chances u the people are given?
can any body say
evarina mains malli conduct cheyadam correct ani anukunte ... massakshiga vaalla mother py promise chesi cheppagalara?
okati gurtunchu kondi
avakaashalu ilanti group 1 lu chaala vastayi enno rayavacchhu.govt is giving much time and age.
but oka sari interview varaku velli udhyogam andukune dashalo ilanti tappudu kutalu kuyadam dwara mondi vaadanala dwara tappuni correct ani vaadinchinanta matrana aaa devudu mimmalni anta easy ga vadilipettadu.
well said brother..few people are not able to understand the state of mind n situation the interviewd candidates are going through now..
sry to say this..bt Plz dont find happiness in others sorrow..
iam taking back my last line
correct ga cheppav bro..case vadincharu gelcharu interview candidates ki advice kuda icharu malli chaduvkondi ani...avdam malli oka 3 years prep avdam notification vasthadi...prelims key lo mains question paper lo tappuluntai..malli court ki potham...sc malli repeatt antadi..malli chduvukundam...seriously interview daka poi miss ithe re mains candidates malli rasthe..vallu urkoru case vestharu...appudu mek ma badha telusthadi
interview candidates vere vallanu chusi yela poradalo telsindi kada...review petiton mana favour lo rakpothe lets ask appsc to cancel the notiification appudu inka chala mandi include itharu
suppose SC annattu malli mains pettare anukundam anni kastalu face chesi. Is there any guarantee that there wont be any other kind of case on this notification?
For example, oka candidate mains ayyina taruvatha kaani dani mundara kaani, SC ki velli, nenu correct answers raasina kooda meeru aa 6 questions "cancel" anadam valla ne qualify avvaledhu, meeru cancel aa 6 questions cancel cheyadam kanna revise new mains candidates list with correct answers ani ivvandi, adi jarigentha varaku mains apandi or ayipoyina mains mailli pettandi ante andharu yemi cheddam.
Think in this angle also freinds. I la ayithe sizable amount of aspirants vaalla pillatho kalasi groups ki prepare avvlasi undtundhi.
My doubt is inthaki case vesina vaallu mains ki qualify avutharaa? yendukante case vesina vaallu memu correctgane rasamu but tappu key valla maa marks poyayi ani vaadincharu. ippudu vaallu correct ga rasina questions marks raakunda taggutayi kadha.
Hope atleast their purpose of filing this case is served, lekapothe intha srama vrudhaga!
some body was quoting 1,40,000 vs 606, my doubt is can we think that all those who have written mains or went to interview shall be removed in new list and whole set of new people shall be joining the new list!!! Iam sure its a wrong guess or wrong math. you are clearly mistaken friend!. Though i dont have exact numbers, iam sure there shall be little change in the new faces in this new mains when we compare the list of candidates who have already written mains earlier. (iam sure we can have proof of it if we comparethe new mains list which shall be released by APPSC and old one which was released in 2012.)
enni saarlu oka exam raastaru?
enni chance licchhiina inko chance iste nene win anukune ee idiots valle mana raashtram ila tagaladindi
interview chesina vallu evariki anyayam chesi raaledu
mari meeruenduku valla noti daggari annam lackoni tappu chestunnaru?
is APPSC chairman available?i think we should contact him to know the further course of action....atleast he should give some clarity..
As per SC order,APPSC merit list chesaka andulo previous mains raasina vaallanu,interviewed candidates ni tappinchi new entrants ki mastrame mains raase chance kosam cheyadam kudurutumdaa???
I am geetting goosebumps if I thought of my prep,opprtunities I have foregone,my parents trust on me to reac upto interview stage.
Shall we(interviewed) meet once the APPSC chairman.
Don't feel happpy for remains frnds.endukante tarvata delete chesina 6 qstns valla loose aina candidates malli court ki veltaru.Ippudu vellina 2persons laage repu vaalllaki same rigts vuntai.Apppudu mains raasina malli prelims key revise cheyalisi vachhi mains,interviews ni cancel chestaru
few days back one candidate was arguing abt re-mains for only new candidates. whr is he now ????
interview candidates must be feeling sad..but blame and slap appsc if u want. why r u guys scolding those guys who fighted the case ?? they fought for their rights and they won.ur case has been represented by appsc and it failed. remember , the judgement is given by Supreme court. it doesnt care abt the situation in state. all it cares abt is justice. just because appsc cant conduct re-mains, shud SC allow injustice by striking down the case ???
these 606 candidates can easily clear the exam again if they work hard. rather than blaming the other candidates , u shud contact appsc for future action.
i dt knw from where r u finding justice in this judgement..plz elaborate.. writng comments here is easy.. Bt u plz be in the place of interviewed candidates position once.. They r expressing the injustice done to them.. Is it their fault to write the exam and clear??
hw many times we have to work hard?
hw much time we have to spend?
dont u ashamed of saying like this?
if u r really genious u would have been in interview list.
remember u cant get chance once the race is over.
If you believe that 606 candidates can be there again, whats point in conducting exams once again. Even interviewed candidates were asking same. Would anybody For a change they may be interviewed again and results shall be declared.
is this ok to all?!
meeru mains clear cheyaledhu kaabatti..u r feeling dat u can utilize this chance to get thru..just thinking abt ur personal motive Plz..there should be some extent of selfishness..
If any interviewed candidates are planning to meet APPSC,Please let me know.This judgement is getting to my nerves.
I will just ask them one qstn either you do justice to interviewed ones too orelse cancel the notification.
first of all who are going to comment against interviewed candidates ....i earlier said......promise on u r loved mother that conducting remains is justice. otherwise don't comment.
all the aspirants should know one thing first.they were allowed to write mains on the subject to condition to outcome of the case by HONBLE HIHGCOURT OF AP.they all were selected on the wrong key in the prelims.they had to ask the APPSC for right key at the time before conduct mains .k.prasad& naga murali fought for the right key and justice without any prejudice.but some of our so called meritorious aspirants didn,t aware all these things.with out knowledge of the facts on their exam how will they express their angry.WITH APPSC THERE ARE SO MANY FAULTS.
IT DOESN,T HAS OWN RESPONSIBLE QUESTION PAPERSETTERS.
TODAY 10 TH CLASS,INTER EXAMS VALUED SCRIPTS ARE GIVING FOR THE STUDENTS.BUT APPSC DOESN,T DO LIKE THAT.THERE IS NO TRANSPARENCY IN RECRUITMENT PROCESS.
TODAY APSET,APTET EXAM WERE POSTPONED FOR THE STRIKE.BUT DURING T STRIKE GOVT.DIDN,T LIKE POSTPONE .THAT IT SHOWS US THE INTERVENE OF THE GOVT IS MORE AT APPSC.IT SHOULD AVOID. THEN ONLY ASPIRANTS WILL GET THE JUSTICE.
REMEMBER THE POLYTECH LECTURURE SCAM OF APPSC.SO ASPIRANTS I U WANT GET THE APPSC JOB U SOULD ASK FOR REFORMS IN APPSC .OTHERWISE DONT THINK TO GET APPSC JOB S.IT WILL KEPT FOR SOMEBODY.IF U HAVE THE CHANCE TRY TO THE EENEDU ARTICLE OF 30/01/2013 BY APPSC PERVIUOS FAC CHAIRMAN SURY NARAYANA RAJU.
such great explaination u r gvng.. Tell me is it our(interviewed candidates) fault?? then y r we at loss today??
Why didn't our beloved friends - present/future's so called meritorious aspirants- Naga murali Krishna & k Prasad didn't asked for reforms in APPSC along with revised key? This could have been the best platform for reforms kind of things. Did they forgot it? If they were genuine in their intentions, they could have done that. Aren't they?
So called meritorious candidates wrote mains with out any obligation from HC ( i hope i am right here), only interviews were done with a condition on out come of the present case which SC gave verdict. correct me if iam wrong
dnt comment on interviewed candidates yesterday SC awarded us emotionl capital punishment...rayandi mains rayandi interview ki vellandi but sure even we are dr are nto we wl file a case and maku u knw wat is meant by emotional capital punishment or else bro lets ask appsc to cancel d mess...appudu ardam ithadi
we(interviewed) will ask APPSC why we were made scapegoats for its wrongdoings.
Ap is not in a position to conduct one day objective APSET exam.But,APPSC wil conduct subjective mains for 13 days......Who are fools here....those who aspire fresh mains think once....
As we crossed that stage and become equal to 1 1/2 yr situation.
I think you will also be in same condition after another 1 1/2 yr due to state bifurcation,6 qstns deleted gng to court etc.
Best thing is APPSC CANCEL NOTIFICATION IF U CANNOT HANDLE IT PROPERLY.
pLS AGAIN DON'T PLAY WITH INNOCENT ASPIRANTS LIKE ME
YES bro ithae manaku ravali..ledante ee notiifcation povali...ee case vesina vallu kuda vere valla laga yeduru chsuthu kurchoni..manku yeduru chupulu kotha kadu
enough harm you have done to us(interviewed) APPSC.Atleast now if ucan't,cancel nitification.so that we can save our 2 more years precious time and get relief from mental torture
interviewed candidates...shall we meet APPSC chairman once?plz speak out
Yah you are right, we all shall meet APPSC dignitaries once.
one straight question to 606 candidates. at the time of interview itself , u know tht results will be subject to judgement of HC. but at tht time nobody is worried bcoz they thought appsc will somehow get the case cleared like last year.
as a fellow aspirant, i feel for u . u hav waited for 6 months after the interview in hope of results. and now this judgement. this situation shud not come to any aspirant.
appsc is the culprit here. how carelessly they dealt with the case. i am happy just bcoz appsc deserve such tight slaps , then only it will take its work seriously. whn they r earning crores of rupees from our application fees , cant they hire better teachers to prepare question papers and keys ?? looks like key is prepared by some poens in the universities !!! such carelessness they deserve this jdugement.
now its upto appsc to conduct fresh mains or cancel the notification altogether . seeing the political situation , looks like they will cancel the noti and go down into history as a worthless institution.
interviewed candidates who want to meet appsc chairman can post date of meeting so that all of us come together
It pains me greatly when you say that appsc will go down in history as a worthless institution. But you are absolutely right and hit the nail on its head. It is my pathetic situation and lakhs of people like me who blindly believed appsc to be a harbinger of hope and stability. ON the contrary, it has perpetuated chaos and spinelessness.
"one straight question to 606 candidates. at the time of interview itself , u know tht results will be subject to judgement of HC. but at tht time nobody is worried bcoz they thought appsc will somehow get the case cleared like last year". The person who commented this...what r u expecting from us.. We should have left the exam conducted by appsc jst like dat or wat?? Dont just write comments to show pity on us. u jst be happy with the judgement. plz dt show ur diplomacy here..
ASPIRANTS FIRST INSIST FOR TRANSPARENCY .THIS SITUATION ARISE BECAUSE LACK OF TRANPARENCY
In India, a binding decision of the Supreme Court/High Court can be reviewed in Review Petition. The parties aggrieved on any order of the Supreme Court on any apparent error can file a review petition. Taking into consideration the principle of stare decisis, courts generally do not unsettle a decision, without a strong case. This provision regarding review is an exemption to the legal principle of stare decisis.[1]
Article 137 of the Constitution provides that subject to provisions of any law and rule made under Article 145 the Supreme Court of India has the power to review any judgement pronounced (or order made) by it. Under Supreme Court Rules, 1966 such a petition needs to be filed within 30 days from the date of judgement or order. It is also recommended that the petition should be circulated without oral arguments to the same bench of judges that delivered the judgement (or order) sought to be reviewed.[2][3]
Furthermore, even after dismissal of a review petition, the SC may consider a curative petition in order to prevent abuse of its process and to cure gross miscarriage of justice
The concept of Curative petition was evolved by the Supreme Court of India in the matter of Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra and Anr. (2002) where the question was whether an aggrieved person is entitled to any relief against the final judgement/order of the Supreme Court, after dismissal of a review petition. The Supreme Court in the said case held that in order to prevent abuse of its process and to cure gross miscarriage of justice, it may reconsider its judgements in exercise of its inherent powers. For this purpose the Court has devised what has been termed as a "curative" petition. In the Curative petition, the petitioner is required to aver specifically that the grounds mentioned therein had been taken in the review petition filed earlier and that it was dismissed by circulation. This has to be certified by a senior advocate. The Curative petition is then circulated to the three senior most judges and the judges who delivered the impugned judgement, if available. No time limit is given for filing Curative petition
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.9140 OF 2013
(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.25157 of 2013)
Andhra Pradesh Public Service .. Appellant(s)
Commission
Versus
K. Prasad & Anr. .. Respondent(s)
WITH CA.No.9141/2013 @ SLP(C) NO. 25209 of 2013
WITH CA.Nos.9142-9143/2013 @SLP(C) NO. 29716-29717 of 2013
O R D E R
Leave granted.
(1) Heard Mr. Shyam Divan learned senior counsel for the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission and learned counsel for original petitioners as well as the counsel for the intervenors.
(2) The original petitioners raised the dispute regarding examination conducted by the appellant Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission for selection for the Grade-I Services in Andhra Pradesh. The examination was to be conducted in two parts, first the preliminary examination which was to be for 150 marks. The preliminary examination was of objective type wherein four choices were given and the candidates were to chose one of them and answer the same in OMR Sheet. Those who qualified in the first examination i.e. the preliminary examination were to be eligible to appear in the main examination.
(3) After considering the reports of a couple of committees the High Court arrived at a decision wherein according to it the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission will have to revise the selection process in accordance with the answer arrived at by the expert committee, and issue proper orders. The High Court directed the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission to re-examine the whole issue and consult U.P.S.C..
(4) Being aggrieved, the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission filed this appeal. Even after whatever screening has been done earlier, we find the following six questions and there answers to be problematic. It is the specific case of the original petitioners that the key answers given by APPSC for six questions at Serial Nos.4, 43, 61, 62, 107 and 130 in "D" series are confusing. These questions did not have one clear answer and that being so it will be unfair to the candidates that the preliminary examination should be decided by including these six questions. By our order passed on the last date we asked Mr. Diwan to take instructions as to whether these problematic questions could be deleted.
(5) Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that these questions cannot be retained . That being so, the marks secured have to be recounted from the answer books written by all the candidates on the basis of 144 questions after deleting these six questions and their answers. Those who succeed after revaluation will be eligible for the main examination and the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission will hold the main examination de novo thereafter. On the basis of these 144 questions some new candidates may succeed or some candidates may fail. It will be the new list of candidates passing the examination of 144 marks who will take second main examination.
(6) The appeals are allowed accordingly.
......................J.
[H.L. GOKHALE ]
......................
[J. CHELAMESWAR]
NEW DELHI,
OCTOBER 07, 2013.
latest news is that chairman is going yo file a review petition. so everything is not lost it seems. will it make the difference?
My friend, think practically. APPSC itself had put forward the option of deleting 6 questions. because they thought that if marks are awarded after the deletion, only a few would qualify and then conducting mains for them won't be a problem.
But SC has turned the card other way. It has ordered to delete these 6 questions and marks shall be removed from those who answered according to the key.
This aspect is indigestible by psc and hence is trying to fool all of us once again.
On what basis, it shall approach the court to review? When the issue was argued, the court itself cautioned PSC not to think of conducting second mains for fresh qualified candidates.
In this scenario, how can the court review its own order?
Even the interviewed candidates has filed SLPs. So the truth is that they can't approach the court with another SLP on the similar issue.
All we need to understand is to press the commission to speed up the process. That is the only solution.
Just two persons even though they knew that they wont get qualified even after deleting 6 qs have fought the case.. for wat?? for whom?? are they so noble persons fighting or wasting time for fellow aspirants?? i dont understand ppl saying that they both are fighting for their right? wat right my dear friends.. wen u cant reach the cutoff where did u get that right. ok lets assume thay did so for others. but in this age do ppl really spend huge amount of money jus for the sake of others??? Must be mahatmas to do such a great thing .. to fight for others rights at ur own cost even wen knowing that u gain nothing!!! Must be so selfless to bring justice to fellow aspirants at any Cost!!! Guys u must arrange a grand celebration welcoming the heros rather than passing off comments here.
Another important aspect is that the chairman has misled all of us by saying that only 200 or 300 candidates will qualify if new list is drawn. It is quite illogical and baseless.
He might have been under the illusion that after the deletion, marks will be awarded and only a few will qualify. But the order clearly states that the answer scripts of all 1 lak + candidates should be checked and the marks would be deducted if they answered as per the key. Those who opted for other answers would remain same since they were not given any mark for that question.
Now imagine, a person who scored 98 and answered all 6 questions according to appsc key would lose 6 marks and stand at 92. The same will happen to one and all. Then there would be a sea of change.
Just two persons even though they knew that they wont get qualified even after deleting 6 qs have fought the case.. for wat??
None ever asked or prayed for the deletion of 6 questions. check the website and go through main prayer. how do u know that one won't qualify in the absence of marks list of all?> how are you so sure that cut off 91 is authentic? if so, why appsc has not published the individual marks list as was done in earlier notification.
They are not Mahatmas, everyone knows that. they fought only for their entry. Without knowing such facts, how can you blame someone?
In the event of a big change in the entire merit list, one would definitely hope to qualify. Even you also do the same, if you hadn't qualified.
You should go and slap appsc for bringing such a great idea of deletion. You won't do that. Rather sit at home and type comments like this. i feel pity for you.
I think enough material about numbers is provided in two articles of todays EENADU news paper, one news items and another in editorial page.
It seems with review petition by APPSC, there is a chance that court may change judgement to conducting mains to only those 200-300(as per info in paper). At this level, SC wont out rightly close the case as wanted by APPSC or Interviewed, since it is proven that those 6 questions have either wrong answers or more answers than key or answers!
So probably with this review petition, there may be relief to interviewed candidates and there shall be mains to those new guys.
I think interviewed have right to have review petition too. otherwise their SLP it self couldn't have been accepted, if they weren't party to the case.
Lets wait and see what happens to this probably last and final set of jobs by APPSC?!!!
Yes u r right .. thats why its better to cancel ga notificationa nd conduct afresh rather than all these complications..
why are you so sarcastic by saying that 'Guys u must arrange a grand celebration welcoming the heros rather than passing off comments here,? what is bothering you? are you paid by PSC to pass such comments and criticise others?
They are definitely heroes for people like us who couldn't qualify due to the faulty key. We are cowards who didn't even step out for our own cause. At least they fought till the end.
think practically kasinath.. phrases like slap appsc , teach lesson to appsc will not do any good in real life..Everyone is at loss if appsc is unable to conduct any xams in near future.. all of us have to show pity on self first before showering on others.. thats the truth.
Those ppl who fought fr 6 ques..didnt benefit from this judgement. Interviewd ppl were badly affected. Bt the ppl in between are trying to take undue advantage of the situation..
Inspite of such big mess by APPSC in this exam, SC didn't even repriminded APPSC for its functioning and the candidates who claimed injustice happened to them didn't uttered a word about faulty functioning of APPSC and respective repurcussions on we aspirants. using this oppurtunity they could have atleast added reforms in functioning of APPSC too, which could have long term efeect of whole of PSCs in our country.
May i know who is paying u Mr Swamy?? jus as u have ur issue everyone have their own here..
i dont understand how re-mains to only new candidates will solve the problem . SC itself had said tht dont conduct 2 mains.
now appsc is saying tht only 200-300 ppl will newly qualify . wht abt those who will be thrown out ??its a big mess..read in newspaper tht appsc might go for review petition. wht purpose it will serve ?? it will waste another 6 months.by tht time , whole process cud be completed if its started now.
appsc has even agreed to do justice to only those 2 candidates who filed the case. SC gave a fitting reply.now again going to SC for wasting another 6 months of our time.
why remains to all, if majority(app 95% as per news paper info), shall be there even if list is revised. This is what Appsc shall be trying to explain SC in review petition and even interviewed candidates are also telling.
http://epaper.andhrajyothy.com/PUBLICATIONS/AJ/AJYOTHY/2013/10/09/Article//005/09_10_2013_005_020.jpg
Thanks for the link .. so as per the news only 3 members will be eligible if the two controversial qs in subject were deleted.and how come this issue became a larger interest? for the sake of 3 appsc has played with the lives of 606!!! is it called justice???
seen this link just now. if its true then APPSC or interviewed candidates should definitely approach SC for review of its 7/10 judgement.
Even in the judgement there is
"(6) The appeals are allowed accordingly." So there is chance for further appeals
It seems interviewed candidates need to group themselves, as the available info shows there wont be major change in list of candidates selected for mains both old and the new as per SC judgement. With a review petition of their own they may be saved from loss which they have not at all committed
friends, please realize that APPSC is just trying to waste time in name of review, curative justice etc etc, till the state is bifurcated. once state is on verge of complete bifurcation, APPSC cancels the notification.even if it goes to sc in name of review, it has to attend same bench, the bench has already given so harsh, mind blowing judgement keeping in view of everything.so they had given judgement once for all, so that no court case is filed in this issue, thats wise they also did not gave chance to interviewed candidates inspite they impleaappsc to conduct the exam.ded.so they cannot revoke thier own judgement,rather order to cancel the recruitment o stop the mess up.so friends my humble request to all of u is go for mains again.this may atleast give 314 jobs to our unemployed youth, instead of cancelling the whole notification.so friends start forcing
brother dr should not be 2 versions among interview candidates..kothaga vache vallaku mains manaku vaddu ani okaru result declare cheyandi ani inkokaru kakunda. DECLARE RESULTS
DECLARE RESULTS DECLARE RESULTS.
why shoudnt there be a review?? Given the facts that are coming out in papers right now only few are eligible for mains so why should interviewd candidates be made scape goats.. so far we suffered for no fault. this time we should also fight for our so called rights.
today appsc is telling only 2 questions are wrong ..not 6
if those 2 questions cancelled only 3 candidates will write new mains..then why cudnt they argue this in SC ?? now these illiterate members in the board r arguing !!
who will believe even if they say only 3 new candidates ?? entire case is abt the transparency issue. let them publish marks of evryone and then see how many new members will be allowed ???
the judgement shows tht SC agreed tht 6 questions are controversial. appsc cudnt prove only 2 r wrong..even if SC agrees for 2 questions , then also same judgement applies. doesnt appsc knw this ??
even if a single new member gets chance again , how will they conduct mains for one person ??? SC order clearly says tht thr cant be 2 mains . how will appsc counter this ?? some ppl r arguing 3 vs 606 !! plz remember tht its not elections to worry abt majority. if injustice is thr even for one person, it shud be dealt with. even those 3 hav right to fight for the jobs. their rights are breached bcoz of appsc . who will give them justice ?
i agree with the argument tht conduct mains for only new members. but SC wont agree with tht..
conducting fresh mains is a prestige issue now. they will simply delay the process for another 3-4 months..then they wll cancel the notification. thts the reality...ultimately , we r the losers. if they conduct exam soon , atleast 314 aspirants will be benefitted.
Friends, kindly you also try to understand one point even the in the interviewed candidates many of them are un employed only. Whats the problem if a review petition is filed in SC to give their version of plea one more time. It seems there is a provision in judgement for that option. Refer last statement of judgement it is given as "(6) The appeals are allowed accordingly."
Kindly understand their plight empathetically.
Dear 606 candidates, Appsc file chesa review petition meeda total
ga depend kakunda gatha anubhavaala drushtya, manam andharamu mana Interviewed friends
tho contact chesi , manam next solid step vedhaamu,
ippudu appsc meeda adharapadi nidura potha, jeevitham lo yepudu happy ga nidhura polaamu.
you say justice to be done to every one and even one candidate also. Then how about those 606 who went to interview? isn't that injustice?
right..we(interviwed candidates) have to contact each other n plan well about our future course of action.. We need to fight for our cause..
Interviewed candidates andharamu
kalisi manamu next step vadhaamu
manamu chayani thapuki manam yenduku siksha anubavinchaali,
we have to help our selves,
tomorrow some thing goes wrong
psc says that it has done everything , SlP, review petition etc etc, so friends manamu andharamu kalisi munduki veladham ,
ramudu vasthadani krishnudu, krishnudu vasthaadani ramudu ,
chivariki iddaru raaru alla kakunda andhaaru neenu saitham ani
raavali
Dear friend ee blog lo injustice gurinchi matladodu esp if u r an interview candidate.. ikkada interview candicates ni anani matalu levu culprits anta,scoundrels anta, corrupted anta,606 mem 10k vesi motham SC ni konesam anta &wat not !! But they do talk abt justice to others and even give free advice to work hard and write mains again ani.
worked hard kabatte interview daka vellamani ala akkadi daka velli ippudu cancel chesthe ela vuntado teliyadu papam ..
Yah you are right, Some time back one guy was saying again and again about 606 X 10k, bribing judge etc.
Dont know how this guy got that kind of info. Atleast people here might have known by now that many of our interviewed candidates didn't participated in earlier hearings/cases properly. I request all of the interviewed candidates to move forward together, so that our plight may be know to SC.
dharma raju ki andaru manchi vaala
laaga kanipinchaaru,
mari dhuryoduniki andaaru dusthulu laaga kanipinchaaru,
606 mandi okka saari kalistha vishayam vera laaga vundadhi,
just imagine a gathering of 606
candidates who cleared prelims ,
mains, and use their energies,
positively , atleast now
please make it
Yes and some one is telling that we should not think about 3 vs 606 majority becoz this is not election anta .. elections ayina best 5 yrs ki okasari jaruguthayi. appsc ki gr1 malli yeppudu jaruguthundo .. oko exam enni yrs jaruguthundo kuda teliyadhu
Dear interviewed candidates, kindly communicate with other interviewed candidates, so that we all sit together and find solution. In this blog few people are exclusively commenting interviewed candidates rather to APPSC who is the real culprit.
606 successful candidates anta
chaala mandiki jealousy , irshya
babu , manamu naasanam iyina parva
laadu , pakkana vaadu baagu pada kodadu, kullu baabu kullu,
vaalu slp accept cheyaladantaaru,
606x10k antaaru, Interviewed candidates andaaru ignorants vaala
dabulu teesukoni paripoyaaru antaaru, manalo manaku fighting
padam ani chusthaaru, ipudu kuda
mana next step lo problem create chaitaniki try chestharu be careful
divide and rule policy, but mana
daggara vari pappulu vudakavu
United we stand
yes sir even i believed their rumours and i seriously regret my decision. Now i realised how much our leaders worked hard to gather us but still only few have responded.we should seriously fight for ourselves this time.
guys , if u want to fight against the judgement participate in every step..plz dont stop by just contributing money. glad tht appsc is going to file review petition.. dont know how many more months it will take.. i hav very little hopes of getting justice now. all the best to those who fight against the judgement. my sinciere advise is keep alternatives also . dont depend on the judgement alone.
i am happy tht i applied for ibps and rbi. wasted 2 yrs bcoz of this gr-1.
thala takkattu pettaina..best lwayer in SC ni hire cheddam....ede last chance..deeni kuda vadilesthey..
Oh my God is that news in andhrajyoti true?? how can appsc now say that it cudnt present the facts to SC properly? Do they ever realise what 606 candidates are going through because of this careless attitude. please do it now Mr Chairman.
Friends let us believe comments against our efforts in this blog and lets work together collectively. Hope SC shall hear us too
I mean let us not believe comments........
Sorry for typo error
first any one please create a platform like page on facebook for VICTIMS OF GROUP1 where all interviewed candidates can join
Put an end to this saga of broken hopes, lies, desperation.
What do you mean by end to saga.......my friend!!
Kindly enlighten yourself about lies you are speaking and desperation you are showing on others, etc. Then come back nd start teaching us the same
why r u trying to counter evryone's arguments ?? does tht bring u justice ? before the judgement , its ok..u were airing ur opinion abt re-mains to new candidates only. now tht SC gave the judgement , do something rather than countering in this blog. meet ur fellow aspirants and meet appsc and decide ur course of action. wht will u gain by countering others' views now tht judgement is out. atleast now come out of ur computer and participate in the case if u r affected.
Dear 606 pls don't bother about
comments they want to disturb
the unity, seed doubts in our
minds, all of join hands for
justice.
pls go through 9/10/13 Andhra jyothi daily , Andharu okka dagariki cheerudam , mana prayathnam manam chedam.
Again everybody is indulging in mere rhetoric, defending their touch me not and holier than thee positions, rather than addressing the crux of the matter. Firstly,
1) Why new notifications are not being released? And please do not quote the " present political complexities" load of crap. If a thousand policemen and ten companies of central forces can be brought in to guard a uneducated politician, son of a moron's house, then it plain logic that, given the right impetus, every exam can be conducted.I am talking about zonal posts and a working model can also be evolved regarding state level posts.
2) This observation is academic in nature and may not be directly related to the issue at hand. I request any good samartian to clarify the same.
If the recruitment process takes this much long, the man power planning going for a toss,So How the work is getting completed in the respective departments? Will not be the existing staff overburdened with acute shortage? OR Does nobody care if work is completed or not?
when and where shall we(interviewed) will meet?first of all,we have to meet APPSC.Tell your probable date to turn up.Repu ok naa APPSC ki velladaniki
Friends,
Let's be clear on a few aspects:
1. Mr.Shyam Diwan, who was a learned counsel for APPSC himself had accepted the fate and put forward the concept of deletion due to the pressure from apPSC.
2. Both tribunal and highcourt have doubted the verasity of the experts and hence hc has recommended for UPSC report.
3. The Respondents have enough authentic material with respect to 6 questions whereas PSC cudn't do so. It didn't even counter/deny the sources of Respondents. In a way, it has accepted that all 6 questions were having wrong answers.
4. The SC judgment cleary says that Mr.Shyam Diwan was directed to express his opinion on the deletion and felt that 6 questions were wrong and hence forth ordered to cancel them and conduct mains afresh.
5.More than one and a half month time was given to appsc. During this period, it could have expressed that so called expert committee has found only 2 errors of these 6 questions. Why didn't they do that?
6. Filing Review petition is only an eye wash. Bcoz going by the above facts, SC would not allow such petition. It will simply can't ammend its order with the prayer from APPSC that it has failed in conveying expert committee's opinion.
Another important aspect is that it is appsc which has approached SC to stop the report from UPSC. Why did it do that? Had it been true that the experts have given only 2 errors out of these 6 questions, it might have quoted the same in their SLP. It didn't do that because they were well aware that these experts and report were not genuine and hence HC has asked for UPSC report. Had it been accepted, then it would be shame on the part of appsc. Now they are trying to act their level best to show the interviewed candidates that they are working hard in their favour.
But nothing is going to happen, Just think wise and act smart. It is only a waste of time and ur resources. Pls contact Mr.Shyam Diwan for further clarification.
Yes,kasi you are correct. both our leaders and appsc have suppressed the above facts and kept us in dark.
It is only time wasting if believe watever appsc says. we shud not trust its articles and news published in newspapers. Being a constitutional body, how can it behave like this? how can it forget something to put forward before the court? by saying this, it is trying to fool all of us. let's ask it to publish the merit list and take the process further.
Let's throw some light on the following key aspects:
1. APPSC had brought a paper with some permutations and combinations on 16th, if any of these 6 questions deleted and awarded marks, then there are 5 probabilities.
2. One prabbality is that if all 6 questions are deleted and awarded marks to all, the cut-off would reach to 95 and 250 candidates would be qualified.
3. But now, it says that if 2 questions are deleted and not awarded any marks, then only 3 will qualify. How can we believe such illogical and baseless calculation. Do you all think only 2 have opted those two correct answers.
Henceforth, Let's be practical.
TO WHOM R U TRYING TO EXPLAIN THIS??
FOR WAT U R DNG THIS??
u said 5 probabilities..n u explained only 1. Try to explain remaining.. if more r there try to explain some more..
ikkada appsc meeda avaru depend avatledu..interview candidates maname poradudam....ippatiki ardam indanukunta case vesina vallaki..qs delete chesthe..meke nashtam,...c brothers please undderstand mem poradithe maku jobs vasthai atleast list lo unna 314 members ki..meru poradithe
1.qstions deleted.no cahnce again
2.chance s dr but will appsc conduct xam
3.even if appsc want 2 conduct due to bifurcation can it go ahead
A clear NO u agree or not..ippatikna mee bhranti nundi bitiki vachi....maku help cheyandi
Any financially well to do aspirant in this forum can make a hard copy of all the 727 comments here and counting and mark a copy to every constitutional dignitary. Then they will come out of their cocoons.
ikkada bhranthi lo unnadi meere brother, try to understand. questions delete chesi marks ivvakunte, there will be a sea of change. Adhi artham chesuko. maalanti missed candidates entho mandiki avakaasham vasthundi. ainaa meeru baaga perform chesunte mari bhayamenduku?
inkokka vishayam. wrong list/incorrect list valla vacchina meeru eligible etlaa avutharo cheppandi.
it is illegal and no one should support this.
Do you support someone who bribed members and competes with u at interview? Definitely no. Then, wrong merit list vacchina meeru maalanti correct candidates ki avakaasham endukivvaru?
Evaridi avakaashavaadam, evaridi swartham? aina system correct chestunte why worries?
boss..how will this blog comments help in solving the case ??? here many comments are one-sided and illogical. u want to take these to Courts ???
@kasinath.. i agree with u . i still dont understand why appsc went to SC to block UPSC report. it cud hav waited for upsc report if it was so confident tht only 2 questions were wrong.now its blaming the lawyer!!! it had nearly 2 months to prove tht only 2 r wrong. wht was it doing ??
now again going to court just to waste tax-payer's money..will they argue tht only 2 questions wrong ?? wht they were doing these days ???
they may plead tht current situation in the state is bad , so strike down the case and let us finish the notification !!! its a big mess they created. again waste of time for another 6 months.
Friends, I don't understand one thing. Is this blog only for the interviewed candidates or for everyone. Then why no one who will benefit out of this judgment is commenting? Definitely one should condemn that merit is compramised due to wrong merit list and we accept that only those who are eligible according the correct merit list should compete for Group-1 category posts.
Then if the list is revised and only the meritorious candidates are given a chance, then why this chaos across the board?
So you don't want the correct merit list, you don't want the correct process, and you don't want the things to happen straight. Just imagine the kind of situation you are in. You are filled up with such corrupt thoughts and blame appsc and others. No matter how much you have prepared, no matter how much money have you spent, the end point is the correctness. Do you all agree? Then, what is bothering you if the court has ordered to do so?
Atleast they will understand the steadfast zeal with which aspirants covet jobs by seeing all these state of the art and highly "intellectual" comments. Presently the situation is like a football match without referee. A slanging match without a moderator. As one aspirant pointed out, all the emotions and controversies that went into this episode did not result in a iota of remorse in appsc. It will continue in its nonchalant way, breeding dissent, breaking lives and perpetuating inefficiency.
hi reddy garu, APPSC has gone to SC with the sole motive to hault the report. Bcoz it thought it shameful if UPSC accepts all the correct answer choices raised by the candidates based on the authentic material evidence. Please check in earlier posts what kind of material appsc has relied upon. instead of facing such situation, it thought that SC might accept the version of interviewed candidates and encouraged them to file 2 SLPs witout any solid background. Hence all SLPs were cancelled altogether. Now it is trying to play a new game with Review petition with 2 questions so that our friends would believe its hard work and nothing more than that.
Just think why it has opted to hire a new lawyer instead of Shyam Diwan? Just check his credentials with some authentic source. He is one the best advocates in SC. Friends, pls try to enquire about this, why appsc is trying to hire a new lawyer and who is paying for that?? Pls don't waste money and time on such things.
definitely we are not against the correct process sir...we have no problm in revising the list after deleting the 6 questions and identifying the new eligible candidates.at the same time we just want to know...that even after revising the list there are some interviewed candidates who will not be affected by this.then..vaallani kuda malli mains raayamanatam enthavaraku justice?
Even though, I am looking forward to write the mains exam, I really feel sorry for my fellow friends. But one thing they should accept that only the meritorious candidates according to the correct merit list should compete in such examinations.
Won't they feel bad if their frnd/relative/sibling faces the similar situation of missing out mains with the wrong key. won't they be happy if the list is revised and his frnd/relative/sibling is given a chance even at the verge their writing the exam for the second time?
Then, why should one worry, friends. All are our friends only.
exactly sir, even the interviewed candidates are also feeling the same..what about the interviewed candidates who remain in the new merit list also..dont u feel sad for them that they need to write mains again even when they are not afeected by those 6 quesns.don't they deserve exemption?
eligible candidates ni mains raayoddanadam entha justico, interview candidates ni malli mains raayamanatam kudaa anthe justice.
For eg, if law says murder is a crime, we accept. But if murder is done by a helpless woman at the event of attempted rape, then?? Will you support the murderer or law?
Then, you say we should abide by law. otherwise, there will not be end to this. Instead of wasting time looking at the courts for years together, I feel it is better to write the mains once again even though I was interviewed.
so, friends, let us leave this blog and start the preparation to acheive the goal. all the best.
Enough of opinion and now State the facts.
Everyone should feel sorry and accept that the interviewed candidates who are not being affected by the new merit list shall be exempted. But one should abide by law.
That's the reason why I am saying that they have better chances to clear once again if they start preparation soon. Otherwise if APPSC announces the merit list and date of examination, they would be at huge loss rather than us. So, instead of wasting time and money on APPSC, Let us all try to crack the posts. Best of luck guys! Another unofficial news is that appsc is also trying to conduct the exam in November itself. So, my dear friends, this is not to discourage you from fighting for your right. But a small piece of advice from your frnd.
this is the fact and you should digest it instead of fooling others to waste the time and money. What is bothering you if they prepare now? why are you trying to waste their precious time? already you guys have tried to lure them with some kind of petitions and now once again trying to do so. this is bad. Let them write the exam once again.
u r correct friend, I already wasted my time by looking at this case and our leaders with fond hope.
After viewing what happend, it is better not to waste our time once again with courts and appsc.
once again writing the exam is so easy fr u.. Bt for us(interviewed people) .. after spending so much time ,money, energy for 2yrs n writing the same exam which we already got through with lot of effort..its not easy for us.. plz try to understand that appsc wil not be able to conduct the exam again..u try to digest this fact... stop thinking in such selfish manner..
what do u expect?? should we stop appsc to file review petition and write the same exam again with u ppl?? how can u think in this manner??...
yes brother ee xam malli avadu..avnivvam..606 members ki nyayam jarguthadi 606 lo atleast 10 members illu vakili ammi ina case pradithe..chalu..review tarvata curative tarvata president ekkadi dak ina potham..dnt loose hopes..
Whether appsc can conduct or not, leave it to them. If mains is conducted in november , when will be the new merit list be released @swamy?
Whether appsc can conduct or not, leave it to them. If mains is conducted in november , when will be the new merit list be released @swamy?
@Kasinath, i too don't understand whether this blog is for candidates who have missed chance or for those who already written mains and again waiting to write mains in the guise of justice to missed candidates?
Some body was saying that other guys are there in mains written list because of wrong key and subsequent wrong evaluation. Do you really think there is going to be sea of change with new set of guidelines by SC judgement! I am sorry, but you are thoroughly mistaken about your numbers.
No body hear is against missed candidates. What it seems from the above arguments, why every body need to write mains again and again, is there any guarantee that there wont be any appeal in future that after revision of mains qualified list.
Suppose a candidate who is not in new mains list finds that had there been revision of key for those 6 questions instead of deleting would made him/her to new mains list approaches court? what shall we all do?
if interviewed candidates have better chance of clearing mains even in new mains, then whats the point in making them writing mains again. Just think of it. Whats the point of letting any one to write mains when already they have written mains.
ade kada....malli malli rayadaniki idem school lo slip test aa.....vidichipettedi ledu...brothers lets come togehter ee sari rakapothe inko 2 year daka m ledu..malli mains rayadaniki meeku antha utsahanga untey..mains rasi interview ki poi 2 years money,time,energy waste cheskuni..malli modati nundi rayadaniki....pichollama manam..india lo top lawyers ki kodava ledu...manku justice jarguddi
Again everybody is indulging in mere rhetoric, defending their touch me not and holier than thee positions, rather than addressing the crux of the matter. Firstly,
1) Why new notifications are not being released? And please do not quote the " present political complexities" load of crap. If a thousand policemen and ten companies of central forces can be brought in to guard a uneducated politician, son of a moron's house, then it plain logic that, given the right impetus, every exam can be conducted.I am talking about zonal posts and a working model can also be evolved regarding state level posts.
2) This observation is academic in nature and may not be directly related to the issue at hand. I request any good samartian to clarify the same.
If the recruitment process takes this much long, the man power planning going for a toss,So How the work is getting completed in the respective departments? Will not be the existing staff overburdened with acute shortage? OR Does nobody care if work is completed or not?
I agree with you friend. Why every body should write mains.
SC gave judgement and the same SC has given option of reviewing judgment too, if there are any missing facts are present.
So interviewed candidates can approach SC, for their point that , if candidates who have written mains including interviewed and non interviewed are there in the new list once again, there is now point in evaluating them once again. Why should any body be tested again and again in the same notification?
may be aggrieved candidates can think of it.
i also feel tht interviewed candidates are in difficult position. they worked hard for prev mains and so they r in the merit list.
but since SC is saying thr cant be 2 mains , wht option is thr ??? its clearly proved tht thr r some mistakes in the key(2 or 6).. if appsc argues abt the mistkaes again, sc will refer it to UPSC again. back to square one..
Even if the 606 batch go to the court, they were made to understand that their selection is subject to court decision?
vary bad judment. I lost 50 lac dowry property bcos of the judment. i may got selected.
Exactly, That is what I am trying to explain to all. Before the interviews were scheduled, everyone knew that their results will be subject to the outcome of the judgment. then why appsc or the candidates called for the interviews didn't react and approach the court on this issue. Why did they keep all others in dark?
After the judgment has come, in the hope of getting the posts, everyone is turning the cards. Even if review is filed, the court would straight away put forward the above issue. What is the answer?
think guys, don't waste your time and money. Think practically and don't be in illusions.
Illu, vaakili anni ammi case pettaru, inkaa edi ammukovaddani naa vinathi. anthe!
@kasinath, what you said is true. veella argument is similar to the stand taken by our parties on Telangana issue. They gave consent before and now have changed their stand. Similarly the interviewed candidates attended the interview by accepting the fact that their results will be subjected to the outcome of the case.
were they really keen on getting the posts, either they should have not attended the interview and gone to the court or filed a case after the interview.
Now with the sole motive of selfishness, they are trying to curb the opportunity to all of us. This is injustice and they are talking about justice.
who made you scape goats? just think... is it appsc or you yourselves? y did u accept the call letter when u knew abut case and the condition.
y did u not go to highcourt den itself? y did u go to court now/? in what way, u hv rights?
The fact is that everyone who went for interview let their fate be decided by appsc and its legal proceedings and thought that the case would be striken off. but now they are shoeing real nature by talking abt rights, justice bla..blaa...blaaa... if u r so intelligent and merit, den y didnt ur at least appsc or tribunal or highcourt abt dis before the interview? shame on u to act like innocents now?
by god!! by seeing the last 2 comments..i feel such morones r there on this blog..
Y r u so much worried about interviewed candidates?? Let them fight for their own cause..
inka chudandi, evaro dowry poindani baadhpadthunnaru. ilaanti vaallu select aithe inka service elaa honest gaa chestharu.
ante idi oka business anna maata. even interview candidates worry kudaa vallu members ki icchina dabbulu pothaayane kavacchu. anduke ee thaapathrayam. nijangaa vallaki service kaavalani unte eppudo court ki vellevaallu.
nijam chepithe neekenduku baadha. ikkada issue interview candidates kaadu, vaasthavaalu.
See the language used by our frnd. Morons?? people like you only have spoiled the issue. you don't want others to know the truth. you yourselves are anonymous and trying to criticise others. what shall we call you then?.....no one here has stopped interviewed candidates to approach the court. the only thing our frnds are trying to convey is the 'truth'. At least you try to answer the questions raise by our frnds.
dowry poindi ani nenu badhpadithe, neekenti badha. nuvvu emaina naku annam pedatava, lekapothe pellani testava.nee pani sakkaga chusuko.
Meeru cheppindhi correct Appsc new remains conduct cheyyaledhu,ela vayidhalu vesthu pothundhi...chivariki notification cancel chesesthundhi..evariki emi labhamu ledhu
avunu e blog lo 10k colect chesaru antu edho rasaru,naku elanti message kuda raledhu..
eppdu leaves kuda evvaru,last time loss of pay pettukuni leave tesukunnnau.....Onsite oppurtunity vadulukunnanu exams kosamu..teera antha ayyaka eppdu cancel antunnaru...edho aata laga undhi..
naku telsi interview candidates lo evvaru new merit list pettina bayataku vellaru...endukantey ah 6 questions ki maximum andaru correctganey ecchi untaru.
435with wht face appsc will file review petition. it has accepted that 6 mistakes were in the key. now hw can it claim that expert committee has given only 2 errors. is it not suppression of facts. then how will supreme court allow such petition. how are our frnds believing appsc even now/ sc might even scold appsc and the interviewed candidates if they are part of this case. bcoz they were already informed about their results being subjected to the outcome and they gave their consent by attending the interview.
yedokati chestham mek concern ki thanks..interivew candidates know better than all 1lakh plus candidates who attended prelims wat is r8 wt is wrng...okkati brothers let us fight for our right TNPSC case is our bible and appsc ki ade judgemnt tevadam mana motto...ekkadi daka ravadaniki manam antha kashtapaddamo.....vellaku cheppina ardam kadu..lets meet....ee sari ina 600 members kalisi poradudam
yentadi..call letter vastha..abba case undi..nenu ranu anala?..nvu atalne antava..rep neku call letter vachaka memu miss ithe interview canddates case pedthe.....
very gud ques u have askd to that guy who posted dat comment.. When call letter came we shud nt have attended interview anta... look the way he is arguing.. really very funny..
indulo funny emundi. athanu adigindi correct. call letter tho interview attend chesina tharvatha ainaa court ki vellochu kadaa. appudu theliyadaa case against vasthe em cheyalem ani. ippudenduku ee dramaalu?
Now suppose if mains is conducted again..tommorrow someone else might file case on other issue.. U knw dat na nw.. So u too dt accept ur call letters...(if they cme)
nenu ranu ananavasaram ledu. aa soya unte interview tharvatha aina appsc ni adagaali kadaa, mari em chesaaru. interview candidates one lakh kante better annappude mee thelivi entha undo artham ayyindi.
hey fool.,don't just pass comments. someon filing the case is different from having known about the fact that it is subjected to the outcome of the case. Yes, definitely, if there is any such condition in my call letter, i will surely approach the court. kaani meela kaadu.
correct, inthaki mee call letter lo evaraina case vesthe ani undaa, leka subject to the outcome of case no...ani undaa. appudu spruha lone unnaru kadaa, mari ippudenduku baadha/
appudu spruha lone unnam ..ippduu unnam...interview friends some of our friends are ready to fight...lets come to their help...vellaku malli mains antene intha untey..interview daka poina man power nto chuppidam
hold on, guys. they won\t change even if you say the truth. they are just struck with fond hope on appsc. that's all. after having seen about appsc, no one shall believe it. but our frnds still do the same mistake once again. instead of knowing the facts, they are trying to be under illusions. the way they are talking shows their arrogance and circasism. let them live their dreams. all the best.
avnu..mavi illusions ee..ithena ma kashtaniki result ravali..ledante ee notification ee povali....re mains ledu tokka ledu
Interviewed friends let these who are against us be in their dreams of writing mains again and again. Let us represent our case before Sc.
The judgement it self gave option of further appeals(ref 6th point of judgement).
yes brother we have many valid points..money pedtham top most lawyer ni pedtham....but please come forward
Freinds be in touch with other interviewed candidates, so that you may know whats going on. Forget about this blog, its full of people who dont live and let not live others
baaga cheppav bro..gelchedi maname...interview candidates..appati daka vellu arvani..mali mains ki interview ki prepare avani
yes frnds...v(interviewd candidates) all r together.. Let them be amused with illusions of writing mains again again n again... There is lot of pain n hardwork behind us..hardwork never goes waste.. No matter out of our 606 who ever gets selected tomorrow.. v all shall fight together..
ee sari manam sakshi sivanand madam ni mana case ki enchukovali. last time vallu anduke gelicharu. sakshi sivanand madam ante mana andariki chala ishtam.
why this fight between 606 vs others ??? both r scapegoats of appsc mistakes.many genuine candidates missed the chance of writing mains bcoz of faulty key. and if key revised , some of the 606 candidates may be out.
looks like appsc is getting ready for another round of slaps by SC .. did it get any new evidence in these past 3 days ??? any new material regarding those 6 questions ?? this review petition is a face-saving and time delaying measure until 3-4 months..after tht anyway they r going to close down appsc.
candidates plz dont loose ur money again in the case. ur case is being represented by appsc. so try to put pressure on appsc rather than hiring ur new lawyer and wasting ur money.
What ever you guys do... Do it ASAP. Pellivallu tannuku chaste.. Vatchi chuttalaku emi cheyalo teliyaka juttu peekkunnaranta.. Anni vadilesi Mains poyinollam calm ga unte... marala chaduvudam ante adhi clarity ledu....
If something needs to be done..do it ASAP. If this process continue for another 3-4 months, if it gets delayed further Election code Jan-Feb 2014 start avutundhi, ofcourse bifurcation 2014 end ki avutundi... but before June 2014 new elections jaragali kada...??? There won't be any new notifications because of bifurcation for next 2 years. Ee lopala Ma Age ayipoddi....
The high level decision can't be changed unless there is political intervention... Better all the 606 candidates meet all the National leaders and nationalise this issue... Do hesitation in JANTAR MANTAR and AP BHAVAN delhi. Sate Govt won't interfere as already kottuku chastunnaru kabatti....
Anyway we should appreciate the persons who fought till the end for justice.. 2008 lo Telugu medium candidates ki anyam jariginapudu... memu supreme daka teesuku vellalekhapoyam.. hats-off.
Once again it is proved Appsc nammukunnodu sankanaki potadani....
Kotta list lo majority paatha vallu unte, whats the point in every one writing mains again.
Somebody is planning to get the same to sc notice. Whats problem to somebody. No body can stop genuine candidates to write mains. Thats what sc has shown
dont live and let not others live ane ideology tho unnadi mee interviewed candidates maatrame.kashtam andaridi undhi atleast u have reached interview stage but think about us who suffered at prelims stage itself without any mistake from our side.memu kuda kashtapaddam,I studied for prelims with one month old baby and with wrong key I couldn't give mains.so meeru maa side nundi kuda alochinchandi nenu kuda wipro lo job vadilesi prepare ayyanu.now all of us should push appsc to release new merit list and complete the process asap.okavela meeru malli review petition vesina kuda it will take minimum 2 months time, instead of that fresh mains nov lo pettamani pressure cheste atleast we can write mains in dec and can attend interviews in feb.danikina antha time paduthndi so please cooperate with us atleast don't say to cancel the notification with that no one will get benifited.
"Kotta list lo majority paatha vallu unte, whats the point in every one writing mains again. "
brother , wht abt the new candidates ?? thr will be only 2 options left
1. conduct mains only for new ppl
2. conduct for all
Appsc has raised this matter in SC on august 8th. Judge had clearly said dont think of conducting 2 mains.that leaves us only 2nd option. so, this matter has already been raised in SC brother. now only way remaining for appsc is to prove those 6 questions are right. do u think appsc has such capability ? at the most , it can get the case delayed by SC by appointing UPSC committee again.
appsc doesnt hav any intention of conducting exam again. thtswhy its delaying the matter and finally cancel the notification.
No body is trying to stop new people to write mains. What interviewed candidates it seems are expecting is if new list is prepared and if it contains many who were also in the earlier list of last year, whats the point in conducting mains to all once again in the same notification.
What basically needed is chance to candidates who lost opportunity to write mains, probably they may request SC for a mains for new one only.
Can any body guarantee that there wont be no cases further and the schedule you have proposed are going to be implemented practically?
Yes brother, what you said is right. SC might have come to that conclusion because new and old numbers may not be available to them. If proper explanation is given using number of net new candidates which is very less(as per paper info available) probably they may change it to option 1. Whats the problem with that representation?
In both the options, winner is the set of candidates who lost opportunity to write mains.
Yes brother, what you said is right. SC might have come to that conclusion because new and old numbers may not be available to them. If proper explanation is given using number of net new candidates which is very less(as per paper info available) probably they may change it to option 1. Whats the problem with that representation?
In both the options, winner is the set of candidates who lost opportunity to write mains.
mains to ppl only is our motto
nuvvu cheppindhi correcte brother. kotta list lo mariyu patha list lo majaority same numbers unte, andharu rayalsina avasaram ledhu. yevarevaru kotta vaallu add ayyaro vaallaku matrame mains pedithe baguntundhi.
SC ni order review cheyamanadam tappu kadhuga. Vaari notice ki rani point yedina unte probably they may change their order.
nuvvannttu ye option lo ayina new candidates ki chance vasthondhi ga. So going SC seems good.
interviewed ones who are in this blog,pls attend the meeting at basheerbagh press club on 11.10.2013 at sharp 10 am for futher course of action regarding supreme court judgement.Plz dis is very important for our live and don't miss it.Plz forward to all our friends and kindly cooperate
In mains to ppl only comment I missed new i.e new aspirants only is our motto
I heard yesterday there was board meeting of appsc members..do anyone know what did they decide on sc judgement
Whether appsc is going for review petition or just accepting order..please clarify guys
As per info, they are going for review petition.
Need to wait, when it happens!
Agenda of the meeting is what is the future course of action to
safeguard the interests of the
606 candidates who have not committed any mistake.
meeting is only for Interviewed candidates.
note:some others may try to disturb
our unity.
plzzz grow up. other candidates hav a life. wht wud we gain by disturbing ur meet ? nobody here is against the interviewed candidates. u can do anything u wish. why u want to project tht others r trying to destroy ur future ??? if anybody is playing with ur future its appsc , not ur fellow aspirants.
someone saying to meet president , other big ppl!!! did u really give gr-1 interview ???? its a case in Supreme court. not some political decision. so fight accordingly.
nobody is destroying ur unity here.thank god u didnt brand us as "pettubadi darulu" and influenced honourable court. such mindset wont take u anywhr. remember u r fighting a courtcase , not running an agitation . so, behave accordingly.
We people have grown up unlike you, that's why even at this situation also we are not commenting against you people like what you have commented on our efforts, eg allegations like, bribing judges, etc.
If we weren't grown up, we too could have commented that you have bought judges, like what you have comments without any common sense. But we didn't because we are aware that cant be done and is next to impossible.We have strong belief in our judiciary and that's why we are planning to present our plight once again to SC.
Even after SLP by us is accepted by SC, you people were claiming that SC didn't accepted, we don't have right to represent in SC and so on.
Then its natural to feel that you may also come to that place and intentionally spoil our efforts of getting justice.
If you feel you are grown up, don't take that "note" seriously, as it is for others of your group who basically are not grown up and which u didn't noticed.
You are right brother, hope only interviewed candidates present there and plan for future course of action.
Post a Comment