Eenadu on appsc group 1 mains dated 21/08/2013 regarding re conducting of mains.
THe blog members are actively discussing about the case at various on the Discussion Forum page, View it
|
APPSC GROUP
1 Material - Useful Links - Full Notes
|
|
Ancient India Complete Short notes (Class Notes)
Indian History - Descriptive Topics for Competitive APPSC Exams Andhra Economy Full Material for Group 1 & Group 2 (TM Notes -80% updated) Indian Polity Notes - All Topics including Quiz Census 2011 - Complete Notes for General Awareness (Class Notes) Disaster Management - Telugu Medium -Full notes for APPSC (Class Notes) Current Affairs from January 2012 to September 2013 Quantitative Aptitude Full Material Mensuration Full Material |
Advertisements
11 comments:
all the aspirants should know that they were allowed to write the mains on the basis of wrong key.winners never like to get success in wrong route .so wait for the judgement.the mains were conducted on the court permission on the basis to allow the govt machinery to do their work.
wat abt the tribunal judgement. .no need to conduct again.all is over. .
pl clarify today sc judgement
Please clarify judgements
recondut of mains and interviews r not possible.i accept the APPSC mistake but that was not done by 606 candidates.they r genuine.this small difference neglect by the court very sad . . . . . . . .
APPSC Group1 exam Analysis:
As honorable Supreme Court ordered. The Justice needs to be done in an holistic way, as it is done in the case of Haryana Public service commission Case.
As every one is equal in the hands of Justice ("EQUALITY BEFORE LAW"). The persons who are eligible to qualify in the prelims, but not qualified in the exam due to wrong key and persons selected for Mains & Interview based on the wrong key(i.e who are not eligible).
This created a lot of mess in the Group1 exam selection. That's why the honorable SC court ordered to create a fresh selection list on the basis of UPSC final key and give eligibility to the candidates who are denied in the process of selection ( As they have right to admit in the Mains exam).
The Judgments always done on Case citation (i.e, referring past court case decisions).
As the interview results are not declared. There is no issue, as aspirants don't know whether they are selected to the post or not. Means they are almost equal to the rightful candidates who are denied in the prelims selection list. So, both are same i.e, both are Unemployees.
The better way is to conduct a Fresh Mains Exam to the all eligible candidates as per Respectable SC order.
This is the only way to remove confusions among candidates and further remove the future comparisons.
Issue 1:
If two different Mains exams are conducted for two different set of groups, (ie, new Mains exam will be written by only new batch of selected candidates), then how the level of difficulty between the two different Mains exams are compared.
(i.e, If Mains selected candidates are not writing in the fresh Mains exam, how the difficulty of Papers is weighed among two different set of Mains Papers.)
It further creates lot of havoc situations in the aspirants on the basis of comparison of difficulty of papers.
Issue 2:
There is a need to re-conduct exam to the Unqualified candidates in Mains exam (i.e, candidates not selected for Interview) - why because, They competed in the Mains selection with some of the candidates, who are not eligible to write Mains based on the wrong prelims key selection. In this process the rightful candidates defeated in the hands of ineligible candidates. So, the competition itself is wrong as it is with the wrong competitors.
So the current Unselected candidates for Interview also have the right to rewrite the Fresh Mains Exam to Compete with the correct eligible candidates (i.e, with the persons who are selected in the correct prelims key and his past exam mates. )
Based on this analysis it is clearly evident that The honorable SUPREME COURT decision to create a fresh list of Prelims qualified candidates based on the Correct key, after omissions and emissions of candidates and re-conduct fresh Mains exam to all eligible candidates.
This is only way justice can be done according to Article 16 - Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment. (No ineligible person can be selected for public employment)
APPSC Group1 exam Analysis:
As honorable Supreme Court ordered. The Justice needs to be done in an holistic way, as it is done in the case of Haryana Public service commission Case.
As every one is equal in the hands of Justice ("EQUALITY BEFORE LAW"). The persons who are eligible to qualify in the prelims, but not qualified in the exam due to wrong key and persons selected for Mains & Interview based on the wrong key(i.e who are not eligible).
This created a lot of mess in the Group1 exam selection. That's why the honorable SC court ordered to create a fresh selection list on the basis of UPSC final key and give eligibility to the candidates who are denied in the process of selection ( As they have right to admit in the Mains exam).
The Judgments always done on Case citation (i.e, referring past court case decisions).
As the interview results are not declared. There is no issue, as aspirants don't know whether they are selected to the post or not. Means they are almost equal to the rightful candidates who are denied in the prelims selection list. So, both are same i.e, both are Unemployees.
The better way is to conduct a Fresh Mains Exam to the all eligible candidates as per Respectable SC order.
This is the only way to remove confusions among candidates and further remove the future comparisons.
Issue 1:
If two different Mains exams are conducted for two different set of groups, (ie, new Mains exam will be written by only new batch of selected candidates), then how the level of difficulty between the two different Mains exams are compared.
(i.e, If Mains selected candidates are not writing in the fresh Mains exam, how the difficulty of Papers is weighed among two different set of Mains Papers.)
It further creates lot of havoc situations in the aspirants on the basis of comparison of difficulty of papers.
Issue 2:
There is a need to re-conduct exam to the Unqualified candidates in Mains exam (i.e, candidates not selected for Interview) - why because, They competed in the Mains selection with some of the candidates, who are not eligible to write Mains based on the wrong prelims key selection. In this process the rightful candidates defeated in the hands of ineligible candidates. So, the competition itself is wrong as it is with the wrong competitors.
So the current Unselected candidates for Interview also have the right to rewrite the Fresh Mains Exam to Compete with the correct eligible candidates (i.e, with the persons who are selected in the correct prelims key and his past exam mates. )
Based on this analysis it is clearly evident that The honorable SUPREME COURT decision to create a fresh list of Prelims qualified candidates based on the Correct key, after omissions and emissions of candidates and re-conduct fresh Mains exam to all eligible candidates.
This is only way justice can be done according to Article 16 - Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment. (No ineligible person can be selected for public employment)
My cousin has wrote Group 1 2011 he had done a lot effort for mains exams and interview, Finally SC Order to Main exams and interview should need to conduct again this condition will also apply who has 606 people selected for interview? I also have one more concern after SC judgment Appsc having planned for re appeal for case modification? What is latest court update please share me ?
Hi sir namaste
I wrote group 1 exams in 2012 september except paper 1 .
Recently sc ordered appsc reconduct the mains exams who are attended to the group 1 mains exams
My doubt is
Can ieligible to group 1 mains exam which is conducted by appsc coming soon according to supreme court rule
Pls give suggession sir
ANY UPDATES PLS??
what about news on syllabus change and new notifications. is it real or fake?
Post a Comment