Advertisements

October 11, 2013

APPSC Material APPSC Group 1 Notification Forum - Group 1 Mains Cancellation Issue - Discussions



APPSC FILES MODIFICATION PETITION IN SC (NEWS DATED: 02/11/2013)


(APPSC Material & Online test Quiz on Indian latest GK and latest current affairs questions 2013, General Knowledge questions and answers  on recent current affairs 2012, Science quiz mpsc, tnpsc, kpsc, current affairs questions and answers, current affairs 2013 quiz, current affairs 2013, 2012 for competitive and bank exams, general knowledge questions 2013 for government jobs in Andhra Pradesh, General Awareness for Bank and All competitive exams, Banking Awareness material with general studies mcq bits practice test. modern history, medieval history, ancient history notes for civil services, Indian Geography notes, APPSC Cutoff marks & Results, banking awareness, Appsc previous papers, general knowledge questions, geography GK, general knowledge quiz, gk quiz, quiz questions, general knowledge questions and answers, gk question, gk questions with answers, general knowledge quiz with answers, World Geography for objective general knowledge, current general knowledge, online general knowledge quiz questions, Indian general knowledge)
APPSC GROUP  1 Material - Useful Links - Full Notes
Andhra Pradesh public service commission (APPSC) Group 1 Mains  Supreme Court Judgement Please continue the discussions of Interview candidates here, after SC Judgement, As previous page 7 forum has reached high number of comments which makes page navigation difficult.
About the Blog: Provides APPSC Material for APPSC Group 1  Notification 2014 and APPSC Group 2 Notification 2014, Appsc upcoming notifications, government jobs in Andhra Pradesh


Advertisements

1,849 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 400 of 1849   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

emi sodhi cheptunnaru akkadu.review petition tarvata final judgment eppudu vastadi?

Anonymous said...

Yah you are write. Based on we shall keep on writimg mains again and again.

Anonymous said...

notifacation appsc cancel chese power unda? appudu interview candidates and prelims select candidates case vayyacha?

Anonymous said...

Its punching bag or facts bag!!! Kindly confim it with your friends if u r really not aware of this

kota stalin said...

Prajabhipraya sekarana enduku jaruputaro telusa! Don't behave like kiddie.

Anonymous said...

any official news abt appsc review petition ??? no news in media !!! is it filing or not ??? or conducting mains again ???

Anonymous said...

interview candidates ki chala aayam jarigindi. na lover ki naku rdo post rakapothe nannu vodhilasthanu antundi.

Anonymous said...

Guys any news about sops review petition

Anonymous said...

Some of Genuine reasons for remains for all by mains failed candidates will be
1)power failure in exam centre for
half an hour.
2)Sound disturbance due to function
adjacent to exam centre.
3)non co operative invisilature s.
again trinunal, HC, SC for
remains for all

Anonymous said...

heard tht some members in appsc r opposing review petition. is it true ?? how cud appsc members demand fresh mains ???? dont they hav responsibility ???

anyone has official news ? whn r they filing review petition ?

Anonymous said...

without solid basis pls dont post whatever come to your mind and especially like appsc not going for review.Ikkada pranaalu poye paristhithullo vunnam.

If u dont understand our(interviewers) pain,then If you are willing to write fresh mains ,then APPSC will make you know that pain.Dont worry,wait for some time,Even you may be so far from the situation we are facing to be experienced to you too if you clear mains.Till then,keep quiet but dont increase our pain further with your posts.

Anonymous said...

The story of two mothers claiming
a baby , when they went kings court, King says cut the baby into
2 equal pieces and give it to 2
mothers . Then the real mother
prays king not to cut the baby.
As real mother knows & experiences
the pains, she wants to see that baby is alive . who is real here
every one can understand

Anonymous said...

Well said bro

Anonymous said...

na lover ki rdo post vasthadi antunnadu. adi garantee ani ela telustundi. ikkada evaraina rdo post select ayinavaru nake mail cheyyandi.

Anonymous said...

I need immediate clarification why appsc is not filing review petition. I am a lawyer myself. And i have to my daughters marriage to a group one employee.

Siva Rao Uncle

Anonymous said...

Uncle , go to appsc and ask them straightly.they will definitely listen to u.

here everybody is speculating. no one has official info.

Anonymous said...

RDO post vachinda..avna...ithe cheppina vallatho confirm cheskovachu ga...ade njam ihte..mari review lo appsc geliche la chesko....mee post meke untadi kadaa

Anonymous said...

Jeevitam sanka naked ayindi

Anonymous said...

appsc is again going to lose the case. start preparing for mains.

Anonymous said...

sare ithe poi prepare avandi.....case file cheyakamundey judgement bale pass chesav....mains ki preparation konchem migilchandi coz yelago malli rasina..inko 4,5 sarlu untadi kadaaaa...appudu chadvochu

Anonymous said...

jaari poyindi

Anonymous said...

why wud thr be cases again after new mains ??? its simply false propoganda. can anybody go to court on false issues ??? even if they go , courts r not blind. if u want u can go after 2nd mains. nobody will stop u . lets see if u can win .

interview candidates hav gud chances of clearing mains again. this philosophy isnt mine. its urs only. some interviwed candidate posted tht missed candidates hav gud chances in new notification ! so we shud let this notification go and then these ppl bless us gud wishes !!!

appsc is supposed to file review petition today(17th). no news as of now. most probably they r thinking abt new mains schedule. mains may be after UPSC mains . be prepared guys. ppl here try to discourage u just to kill competition.

Anonymous said...

oo medahvullara.....court ki holidays 18 daka..anduke file cheyale....meru mains ki prepare avvandi amma...baga...

Anonymous said...

appsc file cheyakapothe 600 mandiki 1200 chetulu unnai file cheydaniki....

Anonymous said...

let this notification go na..abba..aa 6 qstions delete cheyakapothe ds notification has let u go out of competition....ardam inda

Anonymous said...

fresh mains meeda aasalu pettukunna vaalu ikkada time waste chesukokamdi,velli chaduvukomdi.
All the best ..meeru ma stage ki raavaaalani tarvata court judgement valla cancel ayyi 2yrs tarvata maa badha ardham kavaalani korukuntunaa...
Ma(Interviewers) godava edo memu padatam.Supreme court vumdi nyaayam cheyadaniki amthe gaani ma 606 ki anyaayam cheyadaaniki kaadu

Anonymous said...

baga chepav bro...chaduvkoni...vallu..baga chaduvkoni andaru RDO lu ipotharu....manam elage normuskoni undam....justice techkovadam vallake tlsu mari...

Anonymous said...

Why can't there be new cases friend?

Suppose if appsc releases new list along with key and cutoff as per your wishes, there may probably be new cases, saying that instead of deleting those 6 kindly revise them which have answers, so that they may also be eligible to write mains.As usual 2012 lo jariginatte, appsc yemi pattichukokunda mains pettestundhi. ee saari kooda malli moodo mains jargali avi rassai interview daaka vellalli ane vallu untaru, probably they may pursue it, and the cycle repeats for fourth time and futher with another issue.

And this saga goes on.

Why do you think that it wont happen!

Anonymous said...

crt bro...evi false facts,flase propaganda ankuntey..meru beshugga mains ki prepare avvandi

Anonymous said...

whn appsc deletes 6 wrong questions , it is setting a level playing field. no one loses out of this. the paper will be corrected out of 144 and cut off will be reduced accordingly.

some ppl might lose who answered those 6 "correctly" and other questions wrongly. but this kind of deletion is done by UPSC also. no one questions thr !!!! whn a question is controversial , logical option wud be to DELETE.

Anonymous said...

when is appsc going to file review petition any updates on this matter anyone who knows the details update them

Anonymous said...

mostly on 19th or 21st. somebody said tht court holidays till 18th. lets see

Anonymous said...

Supreme court was working today........ But no review petition

Anonymous said...

interview ppl are crating their own dream land and fantasizing.

Anonymous said...

Yah bro, you are right. they are living in dreams of filing petition, unlike we, who still believe, that exams are going to be conducted in this chaos. we still daydream that, in case of any issues of disturbance arised in time of conducting exams shall lead to one more mains.

Anonymous said...

sc has holidays only till 16th.17th working days appsc is not filing any petition anukunta

Anonymous said...

New mains ki merit list eppdu vasthundhi...endukantey last time nyt nyt list petti conduct chesaru kada..

Anonymous said...

Yedho oka night vastundhi, wiatchestu undam

Anonymous said...

appsc lanka kondalu lara...na jeevithanni gudipincharu kada baga.. thndi kuda gati leni paristhiti. akkada inka hyd lo tarimi kodatharu,ikkada udyogalu levu. g4 posts ke iana notices release cheyyachu kada. nenu na family ippudu thinalsina matti mededa sakshi ga chetunna, okkakadu matti kottukupotharu.neeti leni kukkalara.

Anonymous said...

brother this is the situation of evrybody who depended on appsc . atleast now try to find alternatives. bank exams r the best alternative in this time. all the best. u can come back to appsc whenever new notifications r issued. i am doing the same.

Anonymous said...

You are right brother, bank exams are good alternative. Kaani OC ayi puttina daridraniki, 30 daatithe vaatilo kooda chance undadhu, probably APPSC tappa. Ippudunna sitaution ki adi notification iche time ki aa age kooda datochu!

Anonymous said...

right.i am also on the verge here. so focussing completely on bank exams now. in current situation ,appsc notifications wont happen unless a miracle happens. if u r under 30, in november/december SBI associates PO notification is coming. start preparing for tht if u r free. its a decent job . appsc ki elagu age limit ledu. next notification ki age limit may be 38 or 40 !!

Anonymous said...

unfortunately i cant be writing exam as iam over 30.

Hope atleast that exam goes smoothly and "justice" is served for all unlike here

Anonymous said...

when inter exams can be conducted, when bank exams can be conducted, why not appsc. Frogging hypocrisy. We are all behaving like headless chickens making frogging predictions about non- conduct of exams. we telugu idiots cannot think rationally, go for false egos, do not know the concept of collective bargaining. And we gleefully accept being pissed upon by almost about everyone.

Anonymous said...

Headless chickens are those, who colluded with appsc insider to get data, so that they can manipuulate information provided to court, which lead to verdict which suits them.

Dont show your headless chicken brain and frogging hypocrisy!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

my freind, inter exams and bank exams wont give you Group 1 Officer jobs. There is an aura of attraction around it, which leads to disruption of exams when even samll contraversy is present in that

If these are of range of inter and bank exams, those two candidtes couldn't have went till SC, rather could have left in the beginning itself and tried for other jobs or new notifications.

If you want why appsc is not conducting/when it is going to conduct mains, better contact them and convey any information you are given, to us, so that we may also know updates

Anonymous said...

Meeru cheppindhi correct sir,Mana OC 's 30 taruwatha ekkada jobs levu,even Grp 1 lo kuda uniform posts ki arhata ledhu..

eh APPSC review petition vesthundhi anna nammakamu ledhu..atleast raaji padi new mains raddhamu anukuntey adhi kuda emi news evvadamu ledhu...

7 months nunchi emite eh torture.
Appsc members ni evariana kalisara?

Appsc interview ki call vacchinappdu kaliga enduku ani job lo join ayyanu..temporary ga edhi permanant ayyindhi kaani appsc dhi no news...Im also over 30 cannot write any govt jobs.

Anonymous said...

frog you moron( the fart-head) who was talking about insider.

Anonymous said...

I do agree with you mna when you said that bank jobs or for that matter any other do not carry same aura of attraction. Actually that was well put by you. However I find it very hard to digest the general perception that " oh...state is spiraling towards confusion, bifurcation, ramification and other all kinds of nonsensical hyperbole." And this is the reason why blanket ban on recruitments. I am not only talking about the present mains/or remians per se. What I am stressing out is why every other notification has been stopped other than g-1 since they are zonal in nature. I am not a party to the present case.

Anonymous said...

Go and check it with your moron friends, who spoiled chances of candidates who have answered those 6 questions correctly and are going to loose chance, if new is released.

Your moron freinds with other moron have done it. check it out, you moron

Anonymous said...

ee insider gola ento artham kavatledu. may be they r using to motivate some interview candidates to contribute money for the case.

the case was argued on the basis of whether 6 questions are right or wrong. for tht wht help will insider provide ??? we can search any information on internet these days. dont u know tht ???

as we had tight evidence abt those 6 questions , we won the case. appsc cudnt provide evidence in tribunal, HC and SC. thtswhy it lost the case. its going to lose again in review petition if it files.

wht information did tht INSIDER manipulate ?? kindly clarify tht. then we will also believe tht thr is really an insider.

Anonymous said...

Why petitioners lawyer, didn't fought for revision of questions, if you so much "solid" proof?

What was the real motive, go and as your friends, if they have not clearly explained you about it!?

Anonymous said...

Your intrest in group 1 case, though you are not party to it as awhole, it self shows, why this exam is difficult to conduct, in case of contraveries are there.

You are right about other exams, which are zonal in nature. But i assume that, though they are zonal in nature around 15% are for other zones. So in future repatriation of those 15% to their own zones could be a problem. That's why it seems, these guys are not taking steps to fill them.

Anonymous said...

boss..we didnt demand for deletion of 6 questions. kindly correct ur argument.

we argued tht those 6 questions are wrong in the key. appsc cud not produce evidence to counter our arguments. so honourable judge concluded tht these 6 questions shud be deleted since it didnt want to leave things in appsc hand again. thr is no expert committee to decide the correct answers. if appsc allowed UPSC report to come out , then SC wud hav definitely asked for correct answers for 6 questions.

so come out of ur illusion tht someone inside appsc supported us and cheated the 606 candidates. we didnt fight against u guys. we fought against appsc.

Anonymous said...

we didnt fight against u guys. we fought against appsc.

Anonymous said...

we are also not saying that you are fighting with us.

In your fight with APPSC, knowingly or unknowingly, you dragged us this fight.

Every body shall be very happy including us, if missed candidates only are given chance, which they deserve.

Anonymous said...

then the next logical question would be , Why was SC not cool with the idea of 2 mains?

Anonymous said...

yep. appsc has already raised this issue in SC tht they can conduct mains for new candidates. but SC vehemently rejected saying tht dont think of conducting 2 mains. i am told tht thr is a prev judgement tht thr cant be 2 mains.

so the only option left was fresh mains.

appsc got the signals in august itself tht its going to lose the case. sad tht they didnt take any alternative measures to speed up the process.

Anonymous said...

So in totality, after the review petition is filed, there can be 2 outcomes. Either the earlier judgment is reversed and appsc mops up the mess or fresh mains have to be conducted.

Anonymous said...

aithe fresh mains conduct cheyyadaniki problem enti?

Anonymous said...

technically appsc doesnt hav another option . it has to conduct fresh mains after correcting the key as per SC directions.

but we hav to understand the heartburn of 606 also. they hav come so close to the end .. really unlucky.

thr will be huge criticism if appsc conducts the mains without fighting. most probably it will file the review petition and depending on the judgement and the situation in the state at tht time , it will decide whether to conduct the mains or cancel the noti .

Anonymous said...

many of 606 and many of your friends know whther its illusion or not on the role of an "insider " of appsc.

You say you have strong proof of correct answers, if that is so why SC didn't took notice of it. Even if it didn't, why did not your lawyers strongly objected for revision based on your proofs itself, if not UPSC report.

It means SC dont have belief in your proofs of correct answers, then in that case whats the point in filing case it self!?

Anonymous said...

Regarding two mains also, iam not sure, in which case did SC said like that. There are many instances where SC changes its views on same topic/similar topic, based on details available at that time.(Ref: G1 paper 2 sec 3- constitutional cases like keshvananda bharti etc...)

Based on the data provided in the review petition, probably SC may relook into case once again. Let it decide, to conduct mains for all or new or going to UPSC or cancel case itself or declare results it self etc, we Don't know , until the review petition is filed and its aftermath events.

Technically whats the problem to appsc in conducting exam shall be asked them only. May be they are anticipating that with the deletion of questions some may come in the list, who probably wont be there if revision of key takes place. Say if they file a case, they need to go to SC once again or any thing else. None of us are aware. Those who are in touch with that insider can probably gather info and update it.

Anonymous said...

I am the Insider. I hereby declare my identity. I am the chai wala to appsc.

Anonymous said...

Instead of deleting or revision why APPSC cant give 6 marks to all as the case already dragged for yrs.If it gives 6 marks to all those who attempted then all will be getting marks and overall cutoff may increase but no further cases on prelims will be possible and case on prelims ends there.Then,it can think of fresh mains or mains for new etc

Anonymous said...

Thank god, atleast one of you now u came to your real stature.

Anonymous said...

boss argue logically. entire arguments were based on the answers given in the key were right or wrong. lawyer successfully argued tht the answers in the key are wrong. SC agreed to our point of view.

if SC hadnt agreed to our arguments , it wud hav struck down the case. dont u know tht ?

among those 6 , some were controversial(means no right answers). in such cases , best option wud be to delete them. this practice is followed by UPSC also.

key correction shud be done by the expert committee. appsc has also appointed an expert committee whose report was thrown in trash by HC and asked appsc to follow UPSC report.it shud hav followed the order . but it went to SC . thr also we proved tht key was wrong relating 6 questions.

if thr was any UPSC report , then SC wud hav directed appsc to revise the key rather than deleting.

now tell me whr did the so-called insider help us ?? did he send some secret files to us and we won the case ??? our evidence was based on official textbooks and govt documents. those can be found in any book market. u know tht.

so , dont try to paint our fight as some great conspiracy. appsc has to pay for the mistakes it has done.

u shud hav applied pressure on appsc after august order. u didnt do tht . u involved in posting comments here tht case-filed candidates r blah blah blah.

wht u shud do is try to collect evidence in favour of appsc and help them in the case. tht will help ur case. this insider drama wont take u anywhr my friend. gud bye.

Anonymous said...

Thank god, atleast one of you came to know what your real stature is!

Anonymous said...

Boss, Iam here to question you "crusaders of justice" on one point, why didn't you and your lawyer forced for UPSC report as asked by HC, if you feel that your proofs only made SC to believe that key of APPSC is wrong. that UPSC report could have cleared the way for either total deletion of 6 questions or partial revision or deletion of 6 questions.

On the first day of hearing itself, SC gave order of no need of upsc report, atleast at that time u might have thought of it.

What if there are few more cases like "that out the 6 deleted questions, there is answer for 1 or 2 or 3.. questions, you please kindly revise the key so that we may be in the list of newly mains candidates", if SC gives ruling in their favour then there shall be 3rd mains list, here also, there may be cases from 2nd mains list candidates who are not in third mains list candidates.

we could have avioded this probable future mess. isn't it?

Anonymous said...

appsc shld give 6 marks to everybody. interview candidates should be given 6 marks extra in their mains exam. this is a amicable settlement. now missed and interview can reach agreement.

Anonymous said...

to avoid the future cases , SC ordered to delete the questions. u cant question appsc why u hav deleted a question. evrybody's papers will be corrected for 144. so whts the worry in tht ???

its not our headache to force appsc to go for UPSC report. we r confident tht even UPSC report wud be same as our report. so why shud WE force them and waste time again. its the headache of appsc. let them suffer.

even if UPSC proves 4 questions are wrong , then also SC wud hav ordered fresh mains. so upsc report wont be a big factor here.

Anonymous said...

how can you say deletion avoids future case, what if after relase of new mains list, if some candidate knows that he lost chance to write mains with one mark, and if he comes to know that had there been revision of 1 or 2 questions which have one correct answer like seshachalam, etc goes to SC and file a petition on injustice caused to him, because of deletion of 6 questions rather than revision of few and deletion of others?

Anonymous said...

Yah, u r right. How can we assume that, UPSC shall give as what we wished.

What if they say out of 4 Q's referred to them some are correct or some have other answer or some have no answer at all or some have multiple answers, where marks can be given to correct answers as happened in earlier exams also.

Then whole of the case comes back to starting position.

Anonymous said...

Probably, they might be filing a review petition, other wise, they could have told about results.

Anonymous said...

any updates about appsc filing review petition it is playing with the lives of many aspirants its better if it decides to declare results or conduct remains or cancelling the notification

Anonymous said...

appsc will file review petition on monday or tuesday.

Anonymous said...

Great to see inactivity in this thread.

Anonymous said...

Quite a many times strange things keep on happening around us my friend!

Anonymous said...

All things happening now in AP are strange. Its kinda the new normal now. Nobody knows what is happening and nobody cares as long as his or her fingers go in to their mouth. For those who five fingers are still wrapped around a pen, practising, APPSC is shoving its pen into their mouths.

Anonymous said...

is appsc going to file review petition today

Anonymous said...

any information about results

Anonymous said...

Heard that ..APPSC is not going to file review petition..Is it true???

Anonymous said...

is it true its not going to file review petition then is it going to conduct remains what about interviewed candidates is their hardwork to reach interview stage is all waste

Anonymous said...

AManyone who has genuine updates?

Anonymous said...

Pls someone update whether APPSC is going for review orvnot

Anonymous said...

any information regarding appsc review petition plz update

Anonymous said...

plz anyone update any information about appsc review petition

PEDDIRAJU CH said...

what happend guys, all are silence.any updates regarding review petition.

Anonymous said...

why this silence guys? if appsc doesnt go ahead , then the interview can file a separate case right?

Anonymous said...

Appsc as usual is inactive, As it
is not going to lose any thing, Now Interviewed candidates has to come together for filling review petition

Anonymous said...

appsc you are great. it has given the chance for the interview candidates to hire a top lawyer and then wait for the judgment. after that it will blame the interview batch depending on the outcome of the verdict.

Anonymous said...

what does this mean is appsc not filling review petition its better if it declares its decision officially

Anonymous said...

Appsc may be looking for funds to
file review petition as it is a costly affair to hire top most lawyers.

Anonymous said...

is appsc go to put review petition or not please update any news regarding this case

Anonymous said...

appsc looking for funds ?? it has unlimited funds to fight the cases brother. still they r not acting. shame on them.. whts interview candidates doing ???

Anonymous said...

now a days great people are saying
something doing other thing.

Anonymous said...

Unlimited funds?

Anonymous said...

every one among the 606 thinks
that some one will act , some one will file review petition ,But the end no one will be there , already
15 days completed only 15 days left
for review ,lets gather on coming Saturday at Appsc and decide ,

Anonymous said...

CLOSE. The. Case and declare results

Anonymous said...

why only 15 days left ?? is thr any deadline ?

Balivada suryanarayana said...

yes,review petition to be filed with in 30 days.

Anonymous said...

i never seen such type of inactiveness in such interviewed candidates....................its not only shame but bad to the society.it reflects the inactiveness in every field in present society.

Anonymous said...

what is all this review petition has to be filed by appsc or interviewed candidates

sankar reddy said...

sankar reddy

after reading the above comments it is understand that- MANY have the patience- MANY not having the officer qualities-
everybody is discussing about the review-
after reaching the present stage also we are not coming out to fight. some interviewed candidates are telling that we can write in better way than early- anything can happen- that person may not even get the opportunity to attend the exam also-
please everybody think that this is our case not the APPSC-
awake - Arise -fight till for favorable judgement-review petition....... division bench.....extra-ordinary powers of president of india
try all possible ways- but don't blame anybody---.....we the 606 only the responsible for present situation...along with APPSC.... raise now....otherwise notification is going to cancel... nothing else...

sankar reddy said...

sankar reddy

after reading the above comments it is understand that- MANY have the patience- MANY not having the officer qualities-
everybody is discussing about the review-
after reaching the present stage also we are not coming out to fight. some interviewed candidates are telling that we can write in better way than early- anything can happen- that person may not even get the opportunity to attend the exam also-
please everybody think that this is our case not the APPSC-
awake - Arise -fight till for favorable judgement-review petition....... division bench.....extra-ordinary powers of president of india
try all possible ways- but don't blame anybody---.....we the 606 only the responsible for present situation...along with APPSC.... raise now....otherwise notification is going to cancel... nothing else...

Anonymous said...

Dear sankara reddy,
Let us first use our commonsense before thinking about review petition and Extra ordinary powers of President. Mains is the basis for interview, and Prelims is the basis for mains.If the VERY FOUNDATION IS DEFECTIVE(prelims due to 6 wrong qs)how would be the interview list without any defect?All we agree that 606 are meritorious.If it is the case, why to fear writing the remains.I think only who accidentally entered to interview list may hesitate for writing remains.The original 303(FINAL LIST ) may not fear writing the exam. There may be no use for going review petition,as the ENTIRE BASIC FOUNDATION OF THE CASE FOR REVIEW IS VERY WEAK.(6WRONG QS)

Anonymous said...

If 303 or 606 are meritorious, why to let them write once again at all!

Only to those who really lost an opportunity to attend mains must be given chance.

We all know that appsc doesn't act in time, so there are chances that they may file review on 30th day, candidates, who are eager to write second mains along with few more mains, can kindly go to appsc and update status of when they are going to conduct mains. we all need to be ready for many more mains.

Anonymous said...

If 303 or 606 are meritorious, why to let them write once again at all!

Only to those who really lost an opportunity to attend mains must be given chance.

We all know that appsc doesn't act in time, so there are chances that they may file review on 30th day, candidates, who are eager to write second mains along with few more mains, can kindly go to appsc and update status of when they are going to conduct mains. we all need to be ready for many more mains.

Anonymous said...

yah, it seems appsc may take its time to leisurely file review petition, and even if it i accepted, because of hearings and other procedures, it takes lot of time and by the time judgement is give, state might be on the verge of made into two or more pieces. Finally we all shall be in history as candidates who wrote either prelims or mains or interview in the last probable G1 of AP

Anonymous said...

i agree with u brother. whn the entire foundation is defective , how to know who among the 606 entered the list on wrong prelims marks ? even if appsc goes to SC again , it will lose the case. whn u go to larger bench , thr will be more scrutiny of the facts. is thr any concrete evidence with appsc ? no. thtswhy its not filing the review petition soon.

even if state is divided , appsc will be thr for 10 yrs. so they need not cancel this notification. best thing to do is announce the dates as soon as possible and finish the process before elections.

declare something . either review petition or fresh mains and spare us the trouble.

Anonymous said...

edo okati cheyyandi appsc matyalu lara.

kota stalin said...

We are meritorious! If u agree r not!
Evaro edo annarani malli memu mains rayala?
Asalu mundu meeru preliminary exam pass avvandi! ?
Case vesina valle preliminary pass kaledu, then u...........
SC case gelichamu ani ........ kottukokandi.
Adharmam ennisarlu gelichina chivariki gelichedi dharmame!!!!!

Anonymous said...

andariki chinna request. malli reels eyyaddadu. evariki vallu dharma devatha ni ikkada vethukonte dorakadu. idhi emaina tv9 chat show kadu. paisa raladu ikkada rayadaniki. already 1200 plus comments chesindru ikkada. evvadikaina inka dula ga undi ante, kopam tapam podchukoni vastunnai ante, case pakkodu vesthadu le , manam matram ee blog lo pedda pedda omlettes veddam anukunte, just go to comment no.1 and start reading again. adhi chesina tarvata, top lawyer ni manam hire cheyyakar ledu, maname mana case vadhinchi kovachu. tappakunda gelustham kuda.

Anonymous said...

good comment boss, every one think like that. otherwise this blog purpose waste. don't blame anyone, pls post genuine nrws.

Anonymous said...

Dear kota stallin,
I only agree that most of the 606 are meritorious but some of them are not due to DEFECTIVE FOUNDATION(6qs wrong).In competitive exams MERIT changes by even half mark.If the 6qs are wrong, how you can bluntly conclude all 606 are meritorious?

The outcry by the 606 people is understandable.All this is a part of human emotions.I request you first come to neutral point as your views are biased and emotional.Also think about other side of the coin.Unleash and awake your intellectual traits.

Anonymous said...

@stalin. evaro edo chepthe mains rayakkarledu. but supreme court cheppina tarvatha kuda rayakapothe neeke nashtam boss.

supreme court stands for justice. ika adi kuda neeku dharmam la kanipinchakapothe ika emi cheyyalem.u hav a chance for appeal if u dont like the judgement. adi cheyyakunda ikkada comments chesthe em labham cheppu ? so plz stop this dramatic comments. u r not in a TV show here.

oka sari mains clear ayyinantha mathrana edo sadhinchinatlu kadu. yes i agree u r ahead of the rest. but verevallanu kinchaparachadam manuko. prelims pass kaledu kabatte anyayam jarigindi ani case vesaru. repu revised key vasthe meeru untaro ledo telidu. appudu kuda prelims pass kanollandaroo waste antavaa ????

learn respecting other aspirants also. for some reason they cudnt perform better on tht day and u performed better. next time scene may be reversed who knows.

Anonymous said...

plz anyone uppdate whether appsc going to review petition or not during this situation in the state is it possible to conduct remains

Anonymous said...

mana 606 madhavulaara mana andharam
kaludham, blog lo kaadu baita,i.e not in virtual world but in real world @ appsc building on 26 oct 2013 time 11 am

Anonymous said...

any one please clarify that any
where has it happened that conduction of 2 mains for all at
this stage based on the ambiguous answers for 2/3 questions in prelims i.e screening test .

Anonymous said...

any updates about review petition or re-exam

Anonymous said...

the interviews have decided to fight with appsc on this matter. why appsc in not filing a review petition?

Anonymous said...

are we filing the case or not?

Anonymous said...

Hi... I am one of the 606 Interviewed Candidates. i came to know that even if we (or APPSC) file the Review petition, the hearing goes to the same bench with one additional Judge. So, I doubt there will be any change in the decision even with a review petition.

It would have been better if the APPSC has argued to let the 200 Odd candidates to permit to the Mains directly in the next notification. And if any one of them gets selected, give them seniority with the present batch. That would have been a better solution to the problem, because it is not that we are the only sufferers but also those who are aspiring to appear for the next notification (freshers), they too are in a dilemma.

It is enough dragging the issue. Let us gather at the APPSC on Saturday and ask -
1) Whether APPSC is filing a review petition.
2) If so, let us make sure that APPSC asks the Supreme Court to give decision within a short period (not dragging on for months) as it comes under Public Interest Litigation.
3) If not, it is not advisable to file a review petition by the candidates as the bench will consider it a self serving petition.
4) If not, let us ask and demand the APPSC to conduct the Mains as soon as possible by announcing the results of the newly selected candidates .

If we don't act now, the APPSC will prolong the issue for years ti come. Once the election notification is released, APPSC will use that excuse to prolong the issue.

And once the State bifurcation notification gets released, the Mains will be postponed entirely.

SO, lets gather at APPSC on Saturday by 11 AM and resolve the issue once for all.

Sarayu Natrajan said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
srinath b said...

Hi

tripurana bhaskar said...

wt abt repition in scby appsc

tripurana bhaskar said...

wt abt review pition by appsc

Surender from SHAR centre , Sriharikota said...

Dear Friends
Any latest up dation from APPSC about review petition? Pl. don't guess and write something - try to share authentic information so that it will be helpful for all-

I do not know why APPSC dragging the issue till now----- it may take decision either review petition or conducting fresh mains after deleting-the 6 questions
ANy updates pl. share through this site ...

srinath b said...

Wat was the outcome of yeaterdays interview candidates march to appsc

Haranath Kavati said...

Appsc has filed 3 review petitions 3 days back......one review petition is accepted.SOLI SORABJI is actng as an advocate on behalf of appsc

PEDDIRAJU CH said...

hi, is it correct guys about review petition?, how is it possible sorabji acting as advocate for appsc, if it is uppsc may be possible, am i correct guys....

srinath b said...

I think its a fake news

srinath b said...

Hi guys..I heard today there is final hearing in supreme court in review petitions

Pranuthi Esther Mary said...

Hi Haranath,

Can you please elaborate on what you mean by "one review petition is accepted". Will there be a hearing or will there be arguments from both sides.... Can you pls tell as to what exactly is going to happen as far as the process is concerned.

Hi Srinath,

Can you please help with more info on the review petition's hearing

Raja Sekhar said...

News is coming that case was cancelled? any more updates?

PEDDIRAJU CH said...

guys, pls post genuine news,don't post hypothesis news....

Navin Kiran said...

Dear Raja Shekar, Do you mean that the review petition is rejected? Can you please throw more light on this info...

naina said...

Today, I personally inquired in Supreme Court of India about review petition..
The truth is " NO REVIEW PETITION WAS FILED BY APPSC "

Raja Sekhar said...

is this a ploy against us so that we will not file the review petition ourselves.

Raja Sekhar said...

so will appsc file the review petition or not?

Raja Sekhar said...

so will appsc file the review petition or not?

srinath b said...

Review petition has been filled n it was accepted by sc... This is ashok nagar news. Is it Correct

srinath b said...

Review petition has been filled n it was accepted by sc... This is ashok nagar news. Is it Correct

Vamshi Krishna said...

It is not a review petition. It is modification petition to modify the SC order. It has been filed today.

Raja Sekhar said...

what modification are you talking about?

PEDDIRAJU CH said...

what is difference between review and modification petition? can u pls elaborate guys.

Navin Kiran said...

Hi Peddiraju,

Hope this info helps...

The first method to revive a lost case is to file an application for clarification, another technique is to file an application for modification of the order. If both stratagems fail, there are two more options. The first one is moving a review petition and if that does not work then a curative petition is the last resort.

If APPSC has really filed an application for modification of the SC order/judgement, then it would plead to highlight the technical hurdles in the implementation of the order/judgement. It is generally perceived as a ploy to re-argue the case.

PEDDIRAJU CH said...

thank u navin for u r clarification.

Raja Sekhar said...

i guess it will take another 6 months for this modification?

PEDDIRAJU CH said...

yes, u r right, but yesterday as per home affairs report next 10 years appsc recruit jobs for both states. pls comment on this guys...

Raja Sekhar said...

is that a bad thing or good thing depending on the region one belongs to? is it true that like will happen forever

srinath b said...

No review petition has been fild by appsc.alll appsc . all fake rumours...interview candidates do something guys

Raja Sekhar said...

what is this tamasha going one here? it seems no one can trust anybody in thus forum.??? Mr Srinath, how will you respond to all the above comments. One fellow even said that a modification petition was submitted? Do we have to subscribe to the bull shit flying all over this forum?

Raja Sekhar said...

what is this tamasha going one here? it seems no one can trust anybody in thus forum.??? Mr Srinath, how will you respond to all the above comments. One fellow even said that a modification petition was submitted? Do we have to subscribe to the bull shit flying all over this forum?

Navin Kiran said...

Friends,

In the backdrop of this lack of proper info regarding APPSC's moves, there may be truth in what our friend Vamshi Krishna said as far as APPSC filing an application for modification of the order. Because this appears to be the best way forward at this point. This is my personal view and open to introspection.

And Srinath, regarding a review petition, the SC April/May 2013 on a judgement emphasized that a review was justified only when there was a serious error in the judgment or a glaring omission which it failed to notice. Keeping this in mind I am not too sure if APPSC has such serious and glaring data to file a review.

PEDDIRAJU CH said...

guys see today's eenadu paper, appsc filed modification petition in that appsc conduct exam only 209 &next week it will come to bench,pls comment on this...

Raja Sekhar said...

the moot point is what compelling argument appsc can make in this petition what it did not do earlier?

kota stalin said...

Friends I agree with u
few of 606 maybe eliminate due to 6questions. But Wt abt the majority?

Raja Sekhar said...

if exam is allowed only for 209 candidates, can the commission take written agreements from all those who attended final interview that no matter what the result, no one can file any further litigation proceedings? This should give a finality to the issue.

Navin Kiran said...

I remember that a couple of months back one of our friend had posted in this discussion forum that Hon'ble SC during the arguments made it clear that PSC should not think of conducting a second mains only for those who newly qualify. If the aruguments on those lines had already happened, then I wonder how strongly will appsc push its case for conducting mains for only 209 candidates.

Another point it may highlight of citing technical difficulties or hurdles like the current political situation and the uneasy situation in the state may not really find favour. I feel it needs to come up with something really strong to make an impact. Enough time has been lost and sincerely hope to see an end to this long drawn case very soon.

Does anyone know when the hearing is going to come up? Understand that the SC has diwali holidays till 8-Nov.

PEDDIRAJU CH said...

guys any news regarding case.

ani said...

Any update on SC verdict...Whats going on aspirants...Please someone provide info

rbk said...

wat happen aspirants any one post the status...?

lucky said...

what is the status of modification petiton in supreme court anyone who knows plz update

kalyantejaa said...

wassup guys ? any new updates ?

kalyantejaa said...

what is the number of the Modification petition in supreme court ?

The SLP civil had number 25157/2013. If we know the number, we could check the status in the sc webiste

Raja Sekhar said...

the die has been cast and the writing is clear on the wall.

Navin Kiran said...

And what would that be, my friend?

Raja Sekhar said...

Jai Telengana. WHAT ELSE :-)

PRIYANKA said...

Jai Telangana

Raja Sekhar said...

Ha Ha..What a gullible breed we are!!!

Ramesh said...

When Supreme Court hearing ?

Ramesh said...

Any updates pl. tell me

Navin Kiran said...

In the modification petition filed by APPSC, it says that after deleting the 6 questions 209 new candidates have become eligible. Was just wondering as to how many candidates would have lost out from the old list because of this?

APPSC has filed this petition close to a month back. And the wait seems eternal. No signs of any movement.

Is anyone aware APPSC's plans to release new notifications in the near future? I understand the govt has given its nod.

Raja Sekhar said...

The higher judiciary had its basket full dealing with allegations of sexual harassment by a law intern. After dealing with that, SC may widen its gaze on this petition. Or it may decide to include this in the petition against bifurcation that will eventually come up in the following days and give an all encompassing judgment.

suresh dalavai said...

Wat abt today case

Chandana Nancharaiah said...

The next hearing of the case is on 03.01.2014... happy new year friends...
I thick no new mains... no results... Appsc is planning to cancel the notifications.... Pl. do not waste the time.. prepare for other exams... up to June 2014 .. I thick no new notifications ... if every thick is fine next notification prelims will be on Jan 2015..... happy new year for 2015 also ..bye...


1
ITEM NO.6-B(MM) COURT NO.6 SECTION XIIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
I.A.No.4 in CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9140 OF 2013,
I.A.No.3 in CIVIL APPEAL No.9141 of 2013 &
I.A.Nos.3-4 in C.A. No.9142-9143 of 2013
ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Appellant (s)
VERSUS
K PRASAD AND ANR. Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for modification of Court's Order and office report)
Date: 05/12/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.

Justice H.L. Gokhale and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.
Chelameswar, it will be appropriate if these
applications are listed before the same Bench, no
sooner the Bench is available.

Next Date of Listing 03/01/2014

Raja Sekhar said...

A very depressing scenario.

Raja Sekhar said...

why the lethargy among candidates to fight for what is rightfully theirs?

Raja Sekhar said...

with the errors in previous papers coming to light recently, it will definately have a impact on the judgement.

Thumma Thirupahti said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Raja Sekhar said...

any news about modification?

kalyantejaa said...

@ Raja Sekhar

Did you appear for interview ??

Bhashini Telaprolu said...

any one plzzzzzzz aNY INFO PLZ UPDATE IMMEDIATLY,,,BCOZ ITS D DAY FOR US..

lucky said...

anyone plz update what is the outcome of todays case

Raj said...

Click this link for today's update in SC website - http://courtnic.nic.in/supremecourt/temp/59141-2013.pdf

Raja Sekhar said...

updated news anyone?

EARN ONLINE GENUINE MONEY FROM GENUINE WEB SITES said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
EARN ONLINE GENUINE MONEY FROM GENUINE WEB SITES said...

pls update case news. i did not find any news in http://courtnic.nic.in/supremecourt/
temp/59141-2013.pdf.

Raja Sekhar said...

is the news about the re-exam true that is presently going on in ashok nagar?

Raja Sekhar said...

why silence among interview candidates

lucky said...

this is the statement given in sc website. the court said that these petitions be listed expeditiously before the same bench which passed the order on 7th october 2013

Raja Sekhar said...

yes

Raja Sekhar said...

no grass should be eaten bcos of appsc.

Raj said...

Thanks Lucky. If anyone is interested, you can see the order at this link -
http://courtnic.nic.in/supremecourt/casestatus_new/querycheck_page2.asp

Raja Sekhar said...

should we meet preseident ?

Raja Sekhar said...

guys respond. we cant wait much longer for justice

Raja Sekhar said...

will the notification be cancelled. has it no jobs for interviwed. plz initiate

Raja Sekhar said...

will we get results?

Raja Sekhar said...

what is telephone number of supreme court.anybody tell

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 400 of 1849   Newer› Newest»

Followers