APPSC FILES MODIFICATION PETITION IN SC (NEWS DATED: 02/11/2013)
(APPSC Material & Online test Quiz on Indian latest GK and latest current affairs questions 2013, General Knowledge questions and answers on recent current affairs 2012, Science quiz mpsc, tnpsc, kpsc, current affairs questions and answers, current affairs 2013 quiz, current affairs 2013, 2012 for competitive and bank exams, general knowledge questions 2013 for government jobs in Andhra Pradesh, General Awareness for Bank and All competitive exams, Banking Awareness material with general studies mcq bits practice test. modern history, medieval history, ancient history notes for civil services, Indian Geography notes, APPSC Cutoff marks & Results, banking awareness, Appsc previous papers, general knowledge questions, geography GK, general knowledge quiz, gk quiz, quiz questions, general knowledge questions and answers, gk question, gk questions with answers, general knowledge quiz with answers, World Geography for objective general knowledge, current general knowledge, online general knowledge quiz questions, Indian general knowledge)
APPSC GROUP
1 Material - Useful Links - Full Notes
|
Ancient India Complete Short notes (Class Notes)
Indian History - Descriptive Topics for Competitive APPSC Exams Andhra Economy Full Material for Group 1 & Group 2 (TM Notes -80% updated) Indian Polity Notes - All Topics including Quiz Census 2011 - Complete Notes for General Awareness (Class Notes) Disaster Management - Telugu Medium -Full notes for APPSC (Class Notes) Current Affairs from January 2012 to September 2013 Quantitative Aptitude Full Material Mensuration Full Material |
About the Blog: Provides APPSC Material for APPSC Group 1 Notification 2014 and APPSC Group 2 Notification 2014, Appsc upcoming notifications, government jobs in Andhra Pradesh
Advertisements
1,846 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 801 – 1000 of 1846 Newer› Newest»I think, most of you guys don't deem fit to receive the appointment orders. I'm sorry to say dis. Having seen your comments on this blog has made me to say so. The kind of fun u r making by typing silly comments and giving replies to others would create an impression that appsc has done right with us. Had u been so honest and hard working, as is the case with the petitioners, things would have been different.
Enough!!!! What is the result.
@Ramji, I pity u. How can you even think of using such words on a public forum like this? U r neither serious nor honest, so, don't even think of Gr-1. It's beyond ur imagination. Those who aspire to acheive it sincerely, only know it....I suggest you to go to some other forum to make time pass, my dear frnd.
@Namrata, What is enough? Oh, U too seem to be enjoying the above filthy comments and abusive language. Instead, u shud hv condemned those comments. Grt...In dat case, u don't deserve to know the result and don't act as if u r a serious aspirant. If u really want to know the result, wait till evng. Our frnds in Ashoknagar will let us know.
Anil, I like you.
Mr Anil, gr-1 aspirats should be sacred and pure , they should not engage in marriage,they have to wear white clothes, and make sacrifices.
@namrata, U all are hypocrats n u don't show ur real identity n u hv fake ids. This forum is not meant for guys like me. Enjoy, frnds. Mee lokam lo undandi.
anil, you are a superior being. Why are you mingling with mere mortals like us?
@Sempli, I hv already discussed above what Gr-1 is. Nuvvu anthalaa vetakaaram cheyanakkarledu. Deenni batte artham avuthondi nuvventha serious ani. Hv u ever involved at any stage in this case in the past 2 yrs directly or indirectly. Hope, u wudn't hv even cleared prelims n making fun here....Grt,,
anil, you are so original id. love you.
@Sempli, Nenemi superior ni kaadu. Kastha burra petti comment chestunna. Nuvvu mortal vi kadaa, aithe nenu adigina queries ki answer enduku cheppaledu? What is the logic behind 209 figure? Did appsc show anywhere, the list of new candidates? Answer this....
@namrata, Kanisam 19th ki survey rojuna anna nee original id pettuko. Lekapothe lekkalo undavu ani KCR cheppadu. All da best...Nee vetakaaram aapi naa comments lo edainaa thappu undemo konchem chudu. Oorike time pass ki enduku sollu vesthunnavu brother!!!
Yes, I did'nt clear prelims.SoWhat ?Should I be damned for eternity? and this case is stopping further notifications. I have as much interest in this case as anybody in this forum,for that matter, every eligible aspirant has equal stakes in this case.
I think most of you guys r new to this forum. One year ago, we all used to share useful info and valid comments as is not the case this time. At dat time, all were serious aspirants and eager to know the proceedings...
@sethi, If u really didn't clear prelims, then y didn't u approach da court or PSC? Oh, u r waiting for the ripen fruits...Grt!
anil and namrata, you are fake people with fake id's. You want to do tamasha here. Stop it.
anil,What was that again? Why should I approach court/psc? to what result that would have? are u making any logical point? and what ripen are u talking abt?
@Abbo, ramoji gaariki aavesham vacchindi. Idedho paina silly comments chese vaallani ani unte baagundedhi. Just check my previous comments and then pass a comment.
ENOUGH BOYS! ALL USELESS FIGHTING. ANIL IS ACTING SMART AND SEMPLI IS SHOWING ARROGANCE.
WHAT IS RESULT?
@sempli, The issue is simple, but u r not simple. Had u not cleared prelims, u certainly wud hv checked da key. If u had checked the key, u must hv found wrong answers. Then, obviously, u wud hv fought for justice. Now, u r simply awaiting for writing prelims again just bcoz some one has been fighting for it. Is this fare on ur part?
@Vagdhati, ippatidaaka emaipoyaavu, bro. Nee technical comments chusaanu, abbo, nee antha smart ee forum lone leru brother. I'm not acting smart. Instead, i'm telling da truth. No one knows abt the result. Letz wait for a while.
@Vagdhati, Paapam sempli arrogance chupaledu. Thana doubts clear chesukuntunnaadu. anthe,,
Any news??
wtf? yes, i am hundred percent waiting to write prelims again in a new notification, which will not be issued until this case is solved. Why it is not fair on my part to expect a end to this mess? Clearly you have gone way past your logical thinking and entered a super intellectual state?
anil, neeku pelli ayyinda, naku inka avvaledu.
@Anil, yeah yeah..whatever you say bro...
What is the result? first tell me that.
frends, any updates. I think case arguments over by now.
It seems that there has been a victory for 209 candidates.Can anybody confirm the news?
What? How can that be possible?
@anil bro, What happenned to the case. Has the judgment been posted. Please give any updates. @bashini @likitcool
hi frnds, all the review petitions were dismissed today. The judgment will be ready by 9th August. That's all. I heard the news that APPSC is not willing to conduct the exam in the present scenario. All the best...
hi vagdhati, whatever I have posted today is true. There were no arguments held today as is the case with any Review petition when it's in judge's chamber. Since our frnds have posted false aspects, I had to reply in that way. Any ways, wait for the order till 9th August. All the best guys...@Prerana, naaku pelli avaledu. Thanx for ur concern. bye, take care...
The final resort, either PSC or the interviewed ones have, is the 'curative petition'. It can be filed in civil matters too. So, let's wait and see! I wonder what decision will the Telangana Govt.take? Bcoz it did not accept the recruitment of CDPOs as it was held in united A.P. The case is still lying in the court. We can hope for the best solution our issue. Bye, Gud night...
According to my sources, APPSC would cancel the notification and the vacancies would be allocated to respective states bcoz cadre strength has already been bifurcated which included these posts too. Best of Luck guys!!!
What is our situation? really pathetic? SC dismisses, APPSC refuses. Are we to understand that APPSC will not listen to SC?
@likitcool garu, What is happenning?
@ VAGDHATI GARU
DONT WORRY
NOTIFICATION WONT GET CANCELLED
BIFURCATION IS NOT AN ISSUE
SC ON January 20,2014 Gave Age Relaxation ( CLEAR INDICATION THAT AFTER REMAINS , OFFICERS ARE ALLOTED , NOT POSTS )
AS OF NOW SC WEBSITE NOT MADE ANY UPDATES
IF APPSC REFUSES TO CONDUCT EXAMS , IT WILL BE A VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTION
THE SAME APPSC BHAVAN IS GOING TO BE SHARED BY TN and AP Govts
by TOMMOR I WILL COME WITH CLEAR PICTURE
Hello Everybody,
I am new to this forum.I was hoping someone can help me out here. I have attended interview in 2013. But as I understand from news from various sources and SC judgments, chances of appointments being released are rather bleak. I dont know for sure but that is my opinion. But I was told that August 6th 2104, the last decision will be taken and this issue will come to an end. Secondly, If not this,will there be any new notifications in future? I am not able to get information from SC regarding yesteday's decision and I can't rely on news from ashok nagar. APPSC is not lifting calls. So could anybody throw some light on exactly what happened yesterday and what will happen next in the course of this case?
Hi friends,
Any updates on verdict on review petition?
Why are you guys so clam today?
likitcool,
Any updates bro?
Sirius,
Atleast share the info from ashok nagar.
We dont have any information at all.
The news in ashok nagar is already posted in this blog. To what extent that is true, I am doubting the authenticity. Morning there was a group discussion in library that appsc has won. And comments in this blog is saying different that review petition has been dismissed. so very hard to believe anything really.
SC website showing the case as pending.
Review Petition (Civil) 777-778 /2014
STATUS
PENDING
Cause Title
A.SRINIVAS REDDY & ORS
Vs.
AP PUBLIC SERVICE COMMN.& ORS
Advocate Details
Pet. Adv. MS. MAHALAKSHMI PAVANI
Res. Adv. Not Available
THE REASON FOR DELAY IS RES .ADV NOT AVAILABLE
THE CASE STATUS IS PENDING
Review Petition (Civil) 777-778 / 2014
STATUS PENDING
Petitioner A.SRINIVAS REDDY & ORS
Vs.
Respondent AP PUBLIC SERVICE COMMN.& ORS
Advocate(Petitioner) MS. MAHALAKSHMI PAVANI
Advocate(Respondent) Not Available
Appealed Against High Court Details - Not Available
Matter is Connected To Connected Details - Not Available
Subject Matter SERVICE MATTERS - RECRUITMENT/TRANSFER/COMPASSIONATE
APPOINTMENT
Listing Details Last Listed On - 06/08/2014
If a constitutional body like APPSC does not care the orders of the SC which is the guardian of constitution, then I wonder what message it will send to employees recruited by it?
SC website is showing case disposed. What does it mean?
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Case Status Status : DISPOSED
Status of : Review Petition (Civil) 777 -778 OF 2014
A.SRINIVAS REDDY & ORS .Vs. AP PUBLIC SERVICE COMMN.& ORS
Pet. Adv. : MS. MAHALAKSHMI PAVANI
Subject Category : SERVICE MATTERS - RECRUITMENT/TRANSFER/COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT
Date of Disposal : 06/08/2014
Last updated on Aug 7 2014
NIC
In Sc website it is showing that case is disposed,what is the outcome?Please update.
O R D E R
Delay condoned.
We have considered the averments in the
review petitions. Having regard to the facts and
issues involved, in our opinion, no case for review is
made out. There is no error in the impugned order.
Hence, the Review Petitions are dismissed.
Disposed ante ,I think judgement given!!!!!
Disposed ante ,I think judgement given!!!!!
RE MAINS
Supreme court Opinied That it had not made any Mistake in Previous order
HENCE CASE WAS DISPOSED
PREPARE FOR REMAINS
I WILL COME WITH COMPLETE ANALYSIS
APPSC HAD ONE MORE OPTION
@likitcool
What do you mean by one more option??
REMAINS FOR
209 CANDIDATES + MAINS WRITTEN BUT FAILED CANDIDATES + INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES
IF APPSC WONT FILE CURATIVE PETITION
IF APPSC SUCCEED IN CURATIVE PETITION POSTINGS TO INTERVIEW CANDIDATES
IF APPSC FAILS IN CURATIVE PETITION REMAINS
likitcool garu, Was curative petition filed in Bihar PSC case?
Aa judgement yenti,mains raasina vallani mallee rayamanadam justice aa????judiciary systerm yevarikee anyayam jaragakunda chudaali,anthe kaanee money yevadi daggara unte vaadu manchi lawyer ni pettukunte vaadu gelichestaadu.Let them conduct remains for the new candidates.How they will conduct mains again for already selected candidates.
sarlendi..inka manam enni anukunte emundi..kodiguddu meeda ikalu peekunattu ga untadi...
inka anni musukoni re-mains rasukovali...
@vijay, boycot re-mains. manam evvaru rayaddu re-mains.appudu enti jarugutado chuddam. appudu sc mana badha ni ardham chesukuntadi.
@vijay, ur comments are desperate? inka aa gola vodiley bro...vedhava gola..2 years ayyindi ga..inka d#### teeraledha. harsh reality ni accept cheyyu..
Curative Petition
A Curative Petition may only be filed after dismissal of a review petition by circulation. It is
entertained as a matter exception, as it amounts to re-examination of a final decision of the
Supreme Court, although on limited grounds.
Grounds
In the decision of Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra, (2002) 4 SCC 3881
, the Supreme Court
lists the grounds on which a curative petition may be entertained. It, however, does specify that
the list is not exhaustive2
. The grounds stated are:
1. Violation of the principles of natural justice3
: in that the Petitioner was not a party to
the lis but the judgment adversely affected his interests, or if he was a party to the lis, he
was not served with notice of the proceedings and the matter proceeded as if he had
notice
2. Bias4
: where in the proceedings a learned Judge failed to disclose his connection with the
subject-matter, or the parties giving scope for an apprehension of bias and the judgment
adversely affects the petitioner
3. Lack of Jurisdiction5
: where the order passed by the Supreme Court is without
jurisdiction
Other Requirements
1. The Petitioner must state in the Petition that6
:
a. the grounds taken were also taken in the Review Petition
b. the Review Petition was dismissed by circulation
2. The Petition must contain a certification by a Senior Advocate that the above
requirements have been fulfilled7
3. The Petition has to be first circulated to a bench of the three seniormost Judges and the
Judges who passed the impugned judgment, if available8
(hereinafter the “Bench”).
1
5 Judges
2
Para 50
3
Para 51, Para 70
4
Para 51, Para 70
5
Para 70
6
Para 52
7
Para 52Hearing of the Petition
If the majority of the above Bench feels it requires a hearing, it shall be listed before them. The
Bench may at any stage9
:
1. ask a Senior Counsel to assist it as amicus curiae
2. impose exemplary costs on the Petitioner, if the Petition is found to be without merit and
vexatious
Conclusion
The above decision of Rupa Ashok Hurra serves as the „landmark‟ decision on the subject of
Curative Petitions. The principles laid down have been followed and applied in the following
decisions, among others:
CBI v. Keshub Mahindra, (2011) 6 SCC 216
Bakshi & Co. v CST, (2005) 12 SCC 398
Sumer v. State of U.P., (2005) 7 SCC 220
Sidram S. Patil v. Gurunath Shivappa Patil, (2005) 2 SCC 358
The above decisions maintain that only in the rarest of rare cases where very strong reasons exist
the Petitioner is entitled to relief under this remedy, ex debito justitiae
http://www.easylaw.in/sites/default/files/A%20Note%20on%20Curative%20Petitions.pdf
Decision by sc on curative petition is given in 6-7 months.
Ex:Curative Petition(Civil) 126 OF 2014
Points of Interest:
2 Order XL, Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code lays down grounds for a review petition but the
Supreme Court under its powers in Article 145 has made a distinction between grounds for filing
a civil review petition and those for filing a criminal curative petition. See Supreme Court Rules,
Order XL.
2.After curative petitions have been circulated before the relevant judges, they are then heard in the
open court and the parties to the matter are issued notice to appear before the Court. None of the
Civil Curative petitiona have ever proceeded beyond the notice stage but as of December 03 2006,
2 criminal curative petitions had proceed beyond the notice stage and were dismissed that proof
of surrender as directed by the Court was dismissed beyond the period thar stipulated by the
Court. These petitions were Deo Narrain Mandal v. State of Uttar Pradesh, Curative petition (CR.L.)
No.2 of 2005 and Raj Deo Rai V. State of Uttar Pradesh, curative petition (Cr.L.) No. 19 of 2005.
ok here is the story. appsc will file curaative petition this month and be prepared for the final and final judgment in 6 months. my guess is SC will dismiss curative petition, but many of you will get so much angry on me for saying this. So you will be hearing from SC judges. Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
@kmt, where did u find the order? We hv checked the official webistes which are not updated yet. @Namrata, U said that APPSC has very thin chances of succeeding in Curative petition. How abt the chances of the Respondents? The ones who filed the cases in Tribunal and HC (Not qualified in Prelims + Interviewed candidates). They must be having brighter chances for Curative as their pleas were considered in both the courts. They must have serious averments against the SC judgment. Isn' it???
The ones who might hv pleaded for Review to correct the key instead of deletion by referring it to upsc and then conduct the exam afresh. The ones who were intereviwed might have pleaded for the announcement of result and give postings as the case has been delayed for around 2 yrs. In this instance, Both have their strong averments against the Judgments. Aren't they?
Friends, Recent news is that campus students are going to appsc today to ask for conducting mains exam afresh. All of us, interviewed ones are at stake. Best of Luck!
Technicalities aside, A curative petition is nothing but a glorified review petition. It is a recent innovation in Indian jurisprudence. Moreover in civil cases, to my knowledge it has been only applied once. There is no overwhelming change of circumstances nor does this case carry so much emotional weight (according to judges)(It doesnt matter how the respondents or the defendants feel.) But As you rightly pointed out, I couldnt find any order in sc website, only the information that the case was disposed. Coming to technicalities, now it just a matter of opinion and perception, of not us("us" means everyone who is connected to the case -directly or indirectly), The review petition has been disposed without calling for arguments clearly give some insights on the fate that holds for any future curative petition, after a time gap of 6 months in future maybe in Jan 2015.( 6 months I am saying because of past precedent, which the cases I have quoted earlier). Another interesting fact for curative petition in civil cases in India is that, to my knowledge (anybody can correct me If i am mistaken), there have been only three civil curative petitions that have been lodged, two of which have become stale and only on one occasion was a curative petition disposed.(look for case number in my above comments). That is the official position of the case TILL NOW. AS IT STANDS. We can create lots and lots of artificial conspiracy theories like a typical Indian court case, but the thing that matters, the point on which every string rests is that, the review petition has been dismissed without calling for arguments. Arguments which were critical for any party associated with this case.
@anil, What campus are you talking about? Mains afresh means re-mains? How can that be possible? APPSC has to follow SC order.
APPSC to issue a statement and press conference to clear all doubts of students. There are news reports that appsc is contemplating to abolish future g-1 recruitment in andhra pradesh because of ongoing case and govt is not interested. All g-1 posts to be filled by promotions of present staff.
bcos of this case appsc has destroyed group 1 exam. and future of appsc is not nice.
results declare chesindru ani news vacchindi. aapsc website lo petteru ata. chusi na result cheppandi.
news in ashok nagar- results declared.
@Anil there is order in Review petition No 773/2014 bro
CHAMBER MATTER SECTION XIIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
R.P.(C) No. 773-774/2014 In C.A. No. 9140/2013
A.P PSC Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
K. PRASAD & ANR Respondent(s)
(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing review petition and
exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and office report)
WITH
R.P.(C) No. 772/2014 In C.A. No. 9140/2013
(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing review petition and Office
Report)
R.P.(C) No. 775-776/2014 In C.A. No. 9141/2013
(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing review petition and
exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and Office Report)
R.P.(C) No. 777-778/2014 In I.A. No. 3-4 IN C.A. No.
9142-9143/2013
(With Office Report)
Date : 06/08/2014 These matters were circulated today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
By Circulation
UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
O R D E R
Delay condoned.
The review petitions are dismissed in terms
of the signed order.
(DEEPAK MANSUKHANI)
Signature Not Verified (INDU BALA KAPUR)
COURT MASTER
Digitally signed by
Deepak Mansukhani
COURT MASTER
(Signed order is placed on the file)
Date: 2014.08.06
17:57:09 IST
Reason:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(s). 773-774 OF 2014
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 9140 OF 2013
A.P PSC Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
K. PRASAD & ANR Respondent(s)
WITH
REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(s). 772 OF 2014 IN CIVIL APPEAL
NO(s). 9140 OF 2013
REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(s). 775-776 OF 2014 IN CIVIL
APPEAL NO(s). 9141 OF 2013
REVIEW PETITION(C) NO(s). 777-778 OF 2014 IN I.A. NO.
3-4 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 9142-9143 OF 2013
O R D E R
Delay condoned.
We have considered the averments in the
review petitions. Having regard to the facts and
issues involved, in our opinion, no case for review is
made out. There is no error in the impugned order.
Hence, the Review Petitions are dismissed.
......................J.
(J. CHELAMESWAR)
......................J.
(A.K. SIKRI)
NEW DELHI
AUGUST 06, 2014.
Please don't spread unnecessary rumors on future group-1 exams.
As per the law only 1/3 of the posts can be filled through promotions and 2/3 rd of group-1 posts through direct recruitment.Even appsc or state government cant change this.
SUPREME COURT OFFICAL ORDER ON REMAINS IS AVAILABLE AT
SC WEBSITE
CASE TYPE : REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL)
CASE NO :773
YEAR : 2014
SUBMIT
IT TAKES TO CASE STATUS : DISPOSED
CLICK ON LATEST AND FINAL ORDER
The review petition has been disposed without calling for arguments clearly give some insights on the fate that holds for any future curative petition, after a time gap of 6 months in future maybe in Jan 2015.
TSPSC is abt to be formed. gr-1 notification soon. what abt this case.
Does appsc really ban future g1 notifications? seems like that is the reason it is dragging this case. present employees also want promotions to gr1. when sc relased order of disposal of review petition, many thought results were released. So what now?
@rajasekhar, I think tg state can proceed anyway without this case as it is not bound by appsc. tpsc will do justice to job aspirants. not like appsc.
టీపీఎస్సీకి గవర్నర్ ఆమోదం
* ఒకటి, రెండు రోజుల్లో ఏర్పాటుకు ఉత్తర్వులు
* వెంటనే ఉద్యోగ నియామకాలు చేపట్టేందుకు సన్నాహాలు!
ఈనాడు, హైదరాబాద్: తెలంగాణ పబ్లిక్ సర్వీసు కమిషన్ (టీపీఎస్సీ) ఏర్పాటుకు ఒకట్రెండు రోజుల్లోనే ఉత్తర్వులు జారీ కానున్నాయి. టీపీఎస్సీ దస్త్రానికి రాష్ట్ర గవర్నర్ నరసింహన్ ఆగస్టు 7న ఆమోదం తెలిపారు. రాష్ట్ర విభజన దృష్ట్యా ప్రత్యేక పబ్లిక్ సర్వీసు కమిషన్ ఏర్పాటు చేసి, పెద్దఎత్తున ఉద్యోగ నియామకాలు చేపట్టాలని తెలంగాణ ప్రభుత్వం నిర్ణయించింది. ప్రభుత్వ ప్రధాన కార్యదర్శి అధ్యక్షతన కమిటీని ఏర్పాటు చేసి నియమనిబంధనలను రూపొందించింది. జులై 16న జరిగిన మంత్రిమండలి సమావేశంలో దీన్ని ఆమోదించి దస్త్రాన్ని గవర్నర్కు పంపించారు. గవర్నర్ దస్త్రాన్ని పరిశీలించి ఆమోదం తెలిపారు. ఛైర్మన్, సభ్యులు కమిషన్కు కీలకమైనందున.. సచ్చీలురైన విశ్రాంత ఉన్నతాధికారులు, నిపుణులు, అనుభవజ్ఞులను ఎంపిక చేయాలని ఆయన సూచించినట్లు సమాచారం. గవర్నర్ ఆమోదంతో దస్త్రం ప్రభుత్వానికి చేరింది. ఆగస్టు 8న ఈ దస్త్రాన్ని ముఖ్యమంత్రి చంద్రశేఖరరావు పరిశీలించనున్నారు. ఆయన అనుమతి పొందిన వెంటనే కమిషన్ ఏర్పాటుకు ఉత్తర్వులు జారీ కానున్నాయి. తొలుత ఒక ఐఏఎస్ అధికారిని కార్యదర్శిగా నియమించి కమిషన్ను ప్రారంభించనున్నారు. ఛైర్మన్, సభ్యుల నియామకాలకు కొంత సమయం పడుతుందంటున్నారు.
చురుగ్గా ఏర్పాట్లు
తెలంగాణ పబ్లిక్ సర్వీసు కమిషన్ కార్యాలయంగా ప్రస్తుత ఏపీ కమిషన్ కార్యాలయంలోని నాలుగు, అయిదో అంతస్థులను ఎంపిక చేశారు. ఉద్యోగుల విభజన కూడా పూర్తయింది. ఏర్పాటు ఉత్తర్వులతో పాటు ఉద్యోగుల నియామకాలు, కార్యాలయ విభజనకు ఆదేశాలు జారీ కానున్నాయి. కమిషన్ ఏర్పడిన వెంటనే పెద్ద ఎత్తున ఉద్యోగ నియామకాలు చేపట్టాలని ప్రభుత్వం యోచిస్తోంది. ఇప్పటికే శాఖలవారీగా ఖాళీల వివరాలు సేకరించాలని ఆదేశించింది. ఉద్యోగుల విభజనకు సంబంధం లేని కొత్త నియామకాలను చేపట్టాలని భావిస్తోంది.
@anil, This is in reply to your earlier query, the contents may not be exhaustive and anybody is free to make additions/deletions depending on their allegiance and "vested" interests in this vexatious case.The opinion expressed is purely personal.
First and foremost thing everyone has to agree as a base that the 2-year extended honeymoon is over for APPSC. Now it is feeling the heat. It cannot hide behind legal curtains.
Coming to the averments pointed out:
1) SC has made a observation that all 209 candidates and mains written candidates belong to the same category of "Unemployed". Any other bench will reaffirm the same.That is a critical observation.Based on this sole fact, SC ordered conduct of re-mains. I think this argument will not hold good.
2) I am not aware if SC has factored in the arguments of any other category of aspirants in its final judgment,other than those of 209 candidates and mains written candidates. If such a scope exists also, then also the logical conclusion can be
fresh mains at best.
Whatever the scenario its Game Over for everybody. Its just the wait that lingers.
friends, I am not finding results in appsc website. Plz provide the link.
@Sirius garu, What are you talking about?
total news black out on orders of sc on mains case in media. it is a ploy of appsc to give appointments in 2 days. this is good news for all interview candidates.
Mr.Rajasekhat first mind your language in public forums,You dont have any common sense at all.Neekelaagu ye job raadu kabatti neekide dikkemo,some people like me is passionate about the service to the public.Nothing will happen to me if they cancel notification.I am not dependent like you on group 1.Mind your language and give reply to the others posts.You will not get any other job,thats why you are still fighting for this case even you failed in prelims.Prelims lo fail ainaollu silent ga undi unte ee time ki inko notification padi undedi,neelanti kontha mandi swartha parula valla paapam chaalaa mandi life naasanam avutondi.
@Rajasekhar you don't have common sense at all,once again you proved.
But I have work and commonsense,I will not waste my time on you.
Best of luck.
what happenned friends? Why this silence after court judgment? What step should we take now?
ikkada godava padadam kadu..interview candidates ...mana noti dagara koodu...coaching institutes balam..chuskuni...lakkuntunnaru...ippatikina...nidra manesi..lets go to appsc next week...aamarana nirahara deeksha cheddam....manalo okari pranam poi migitha 300 mandiki koodu dorkina ok..aa enthusiasm aa passion unda...manaki.....poratam chesthe CIVILS lanti exam pattern ee..change cheyali ani..centre kadilindi....manam anukuntey..mana problem..solve cheskogalam
INKA..vere vallu poradtharu..manaki jobs testharu anukune vallu unnara?,,unte..meru manasika vyadhi tho badhapdthunnate....job kavalante...rasina prelims..mains interview kashtam gurthu techukondi.....poradatham..techukundm....pranani phananga pettina..sare
nenu ee sari mains baga rayaledu..interview baga cheyaledu...so naku MPDO vachi untadi...remains rasthe naku RDO vasthadi..elantivi..kuda unnai....kani ee sari rase vallatho competition stiff ai vachina MPDO kuda oodithe??...aa case kosam chusthunna valallo sagam civils preparation gattiga chesthunnavalle....so..mee ishtam..fake id timepass kosam vachevallu chala mandi unnaru..in this blog..my messages are only for serious candidates
GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA
ABSTRACT
State of Telangana – Constitution of Telangana State Public Service Commission – Notification – Orders – Issued.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (SER.A) DEPARTMENT
G.O.Ms.No. Date: 08.08.2014.
ORDER:
The State of Telangana came into existence with effect from the appointed day i.e., 02.06.2014.
Section 83(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Re-Organisation Act, 2014 (Central Act.6/2014) providing for constitution of a Public Service Commission in the Successor State of Telangana read as follows.
“83(2) There shall be constituted a Public Service Commission in accordance with article 315 of Constitution by the successor State of Telangana, and until such Commission is constituted, the Union Public Service Commission may, with the approval of the President, agree to serve the needs of the State of Telangana in terms of clause(4) of that article”.
In pursuance of the above, the Government of Telangana State have decided to constitute a separate Public Service Commission for the State of Telangana with immediate effect for making selections to the posts under various categories meant for direct recruitment under its purview in the State of Telangana and for carrying out functions under article 320 of Constitution of India.
Accordingly, the following Notification will be published in the Extraordinary issue of the Telangana Gazette, dated: 08.08.2014.
NOTIFICATION
In exercise of the powers conferred under Article 315 (1) of Constitution of India, the Governor of Telangana hereby constitute the Public Service Commission for the State of Telangana with immediate effect for making selections to the posts under various categories meant for direct recruitment under its purview in the State of Telangana and for carrying out functions under article 320 of Constitution of India.
(BY ORDER AND IN THE NAME OF THE GOVERNOR OF TELANGANA)
Dr.RAJIV SHARMA
CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
To
The Commissioner of Printing, Stationery & Stores
Purchase, Telangana, Hyderabad
(for publication of the notification in Telangana Gazette and to furnish 500 copies)
(Pto)
::2::
All the Departments of Secretariat,
including General Administration Department and Law (C) Department.
All Heads of Departments,
All District Collectors,
The Secretary, Union Public Service Commission, New Delhi.
The Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Hyderabad.
The Accountant General, Telangana., Hyderabad
The Commissioner, I & PR Department, Telangana., Hyderabad
The Pay & Accounts Officer, Telangana., Hyderabad
Copy to:
The Spl. Chief Secretary to Governor, Raj Bhavan, Hyderabad.
The Prl. Secretary to Chief Minister
The P.S. to Chief Secretary
The P.S. to Secretary (Services)
The Information Officer, Press Information Bureau,
Government of India, Khaleel Mansions,
Mount Road, Chennai.
The Librarian, Telangana Legislative Assembly, Hyderabad (2 copies).
The Librarian, Lok Sabha Library, Government of India,
Department of Personnel, Cabinet Secretariat, New Delhi.
The Commercial Library attached to the Office of the
Director General of Commercial Intelligence & Statistics-I,
Council House Street, Calcutta (2 copies).
The Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi.
The Librarian, Central Secretariat Library,
Ministry of Education & Scientific Research, New Delhi.
The Deputy Secretary to Government, Directorate of Manpower,
Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi (2 copies).
The Manpower Officer & Deputy Secretary to Government,
Planning Department, Hyderabad.
SF/SCs.
// FORWARDED : : BY ORDER //
SECTION OFFICER
interview cands remains ki oppukom...unko ten years ayina coirt lo fight chestham, sc tarvata malli high court lo case vestam.maku anyayam jarigindi.already kontha mandi ki financial problems ani antunnaru. @prerana, mana kadupu kotti ee coaching centers andharu chesina darunamaina mosaniki manam andharu ante interview cands enduku bali avvali. memu malli mains rayamu.evvarni rayinchamu kuda. telngana govt ki ee vishayam lo memu kalaga chesukoni nyayam cheyalani adugutam. asalu 209 cand telengana biddalu ku anyayam chest unnaru. 209 cands lo evaru telengana ku chendina vallu leru?ante dani ardham emiti. sc judges seemandhra vepu emaina partiality chupistunnara? re-mains undakudadu. undanivvam. memu unko padi savatsralu poradi ma nijayiti ni chatukuntam.
my job my right, rdo and mpdo madhya diffrence emi undhi?
any news from appsc?
Andharu Sraddaga vinandi, ee notification 99 percent cancel ayyinatle. migatha 1 percent hope undi results release cheyyadaniki. ee rendu margale unnayi. sc emi cheppina sare, appsc ki cancellation chese hakku undhi. Enduku cancellation ante reasons separaatu ga vivarichkarledhu emo..ayina ee two reasons unnayi. legal problems, fresh mains issue and tg govt attitude and tspsc formation. ee thala noppi antha evadu ra padathadu ani appsc cancellation chesthadi. So re-mains and kankar piece emi undadhu. kukka pilli potaladukunattu undhi.
* మళ్లీ నిర్వహించక తప్పని పరిస్థితి
* గత తీర్పుపై సమీక్షకు సుప్రీం ససేమిరా!
* ప్రశ్నల రూపకర్తల బాధ్యతారాహిత్యంతో అభ్యర్థులకు నష్టం
* మరోసారి సుప్రీంను ఆశ్రయించే యోచనలో ఏపీపీఎస్సీ
ఈనాడు, హైదరాబాద్: గ్రూపు-1 (2011 నోటిఫికేషన్) ప్రధాన పరీక్ష వ్యవహారం మళ్లీ మొదటికొచ్చింది. గ్రూపు-1 ప్రధాన పరీక్షను మళ్లీ నిర్వహించాల్సిన పరిస్థితుల్లో అందరికీ కాకుండా, కొద్దిమందికి మాత్రమే జరిపేలా ఏపీపీఎస్సీ చేసిన ప్రయత్నాలు విఫలం కావడంతో మౌఖిక పరీక్షలకు హాజరై ఫలితాల కోసం చూస్తున్న అభ్యర్థుల పరిస్థితి దయనీయంగా మారింది. ప్రశ్నలను తప్పుగా ఇవ్వడంతో ప్రధాన పరీక్షను మళ్లీ నిర్వహించాలని సుప్రీంకోర్టు గత జనవరిలో ఆదేశించగా.. పునఃపరిశీలన కోసం రెండు విడతల్లో ఏపీపీఎస్సీ చేసిన ప్రయత్నాలు విఫలమయ్యాయి. తాజాగా ఆగస్టు 6న సుప్రీంకోర్టు ఏపీపీఎస్సీ అభ్యర్థనను పరిశీలించేందుకు అనుమతించకపోవడంతో ప్రధాన పరీక్షను మళ్లీ నిర్వహించాల్సిన పరిస్థితులు కనిపిస్తున్నాయి.
2011లో 314 గ్రూపు-1 ఉద్యోగాల భర్తీకి నోటిఫికేషన్ జారీచేసి 2012 మే 27న ప్రిలిమ్స్ పరీక్ష నిర్వహించారు. దీనికి సంబంధించి విడుదల చేసిన 'కీ ప్రకారం ఆరు తప్పులు ఉన్నందున న్యాయం చేయాలని కోరుతూ పలువురు అభ్యర్థులు పరిపాలనా ట్రైబ్యునల్ను ఆశ్రయించారు. అనంతరం అభ్యర్థులు హైకోర్టును ఆశ్రయించగా, ఆ ఆరు ప్రశ్నల విశ్వసనీయతపై యూపీఎస్సీని నివేదిక ఇమ్మని కోరింది. దీంతో ఏపీపీఎస్సీ సుప్రీంకోర్టును ఆశ్రయించగా.. ఆ ప్రశ్నలను తొలగించి మళ్లీ ప్రధాన పరీక్షను జరపాలని న్యాయస్థానం గతేడాది అక్టోబరులో తీర్పుచెప్పింది. అయితే, ఆ ఆరు ప్రశ్నల వల్ల 209 మందిపైనే ప్రభావం పడిందని.. వారికి మాత్రమే మళ్లీ పరీక్ష నిర్వహించేలా ఆదేశాలు ఇవ్వాలంటూ ఏపీపీఎస్సీ చేసిన ప్రయత్నాలు ఫలించలేదు. ఇదే అంశంపై మరోసారి క్యురేటివ్ పిటిషన్ ద్వారా సుప్రీంకోర్టును ఆశ్రయించాలని ఏపీపీఎస్సీ యోచిస్తున్నా ఎంతవరకు ఫలితమిస్తుందన్నది ప్రశ్నార్థకమే.
అభ్యర్థుల్లో ఆందోళన..
గ్రూపు-1 మెయిన్స్ పరీక్ష మళ్లీ జరిపే సూచనలు కనిపిస్తుండటంతో అభ్యర్థులు ఆందోళన చెందుతున్నారు. 2012 మేలో జరిగిన ప్రిలిమ్స్ను ఒకటిన్నర లక్షల మంది రాశారు. వీరిలో సుమారు 12 వేల మంది అదే ఏడాది సెప్టెంబరులో మెయిన్స్ పరీక్ష రాశారు. అందులో ఎంపికైన దాదాపు 600 మంది అభ్యర్థులకు గతేడాది ఏపీపీఎస్సీ ఒకే బోర్డు ద్వారా మౌఖిక పరీక్షలు(ఇంటర్వ్యూ) నిర్వహించింది. వాటికి హాజరై ఉద్యోగానికి ఎంపికవుతామన్న నమ్మకంతో ఉన్నవారికి తాజా పరిణామం మింగుడుపడటంలేదు. మరోవైపు రాష్ట్ర విభజన నేపథ్యంలో ప్రధాన పరీక్ష నిర్వహణకు రెండు రాష్ట్రాల మధ్య సయోధ్య అవసరం.
ఏమవుతుందో..?
ఏపీపీఎస్సీ రివ్యూ పిటిషన్ ఆగస్టు 6న సుప్రీంకోర్టులో తిరస్కరణకు గురైన నేపథ్యంలో కమిషన్ మరోసారి సమావేశమై న్యాయనిపుణులతో సంప్రదించి క్యురేటివ్ పిటిషన్ దాఖలుచేసే అంశాన్ని పరిశీలిస్తోంది. అయితే.. రెండుసార్లు సుప్రీంకోర్టులో చుక్కెదురైన నేపథ్యంలో సానుకూలత రావడం కష్టమేనని భావిస్తున్నారు. ఈ పరిస్థితుల్లో మళ్లీ ప్రధాన పరీక్ష నిర్వహించాలంటే తెలంగాణ, ఆంధ్రప్రదేశ్ పబ్లిక్ సర్వీస్ కమిషన్ల మధ్య సంప్రదింపులు జరగాల్సి ఉంది. మరోవైపు.. ఉద్యోగులు, అధికారులు రాష్ట్రాల వారీగా విడిపోతున్న నేపథ్యంలో..ఈ పోస్టుల భర్తీ అంశంపై రెండు ప్రభుత్వాల మధ్య చర్చ జరగాల్సిన అవసరం ఉంది. తాజా పరిణామాలపై నిర్ణయం తీసుకునేందుకే సమయం పట్టనున్న పరిస్థితుల్లో మళ్లీ పరీక్ష నిర్వహించాలంటే ఇంకా సమయం పట్టొచ్చు.
@Namrata, thanx for the reply. But u hvn't answered my previous query. APPSC and all of us are talking abt 209 candidates. What is the efficacy of this no. Do u still believe in appsc that it has given accurate figure. For ur kind info.,Review petition No.772-774 were filed by the candidates based on this issue only. They infact, have questioned the authenticity of this figure. Bcoz, appsc had submitted a cooked up table showing the figure 209 just to prove that those 2 candidates would not qualify. Their R.P clearly proves how fake this no. is and questions the authority of S.C on deleting questions.
“H.P.Public Service Commission Vs Mukesh Thakur & Anr. On 25th May 2010; Civil Appeal No. 907 of 2006”- Para No.12, Extracted below:
“In the facts and circumstances of the aforesaid case, three basic questions arise for consideration of this Court:- i) as to whether it is permissible for the court to take the task of Examiner/Selection Board upon itself and examine discrepancies and inconsistencies in the questions paper and valuation thereof.”
“It is a matter of chance that the High court was examining the answer sheets relating to law. Had it been other subjects like physics, chemistry and mathematics, we are unable to understand as to whether such a course could have been adopted by the High court”
“Therefore, we are of the considered opinion that such a course was not permissible to the High court.”
“Manish Ujwal And Ors. Vs Maharishi Dayanand Saraswati University on 16th August 2005” - Para No. 9, Extracted below:
“The High Court has committed a serious illegality in coming to the conclusion that "it cannot be said with certainty that answers to six questions given in the key answers were erroneous and incorrect". As already noticed, the key answers are palpably and demonstrably erroneous.”
“In that view of the matter, the student community, whether the appellants or interveners or even those who did not approach the High Court or this Court, cannot be made to suffer on account of errors committed by the University. For the present, we say no more because there is nothing on record as to how this error crept up in giving the erroneous key answers and who was negligent. At the same time, however, it is necessary to note that the University and those who prepare the key answers have to be very careful and abundant caution is necessary in these matters for more than one reason.”
“First and paramount reason being the welfare of the student and a wrong key answer can result in the merit being made a casualty.”
“One can well understand the predicament of a young student at the threshold of his or her career if despite giving correct answer, the student suffers as a result of wrong and demonstrably erroneous key answer.”
“We mention few of those; first and paramount reason being the welfare of the student and a wrong key answer can result in the merit being made a casualty. One can well understand the predicament of a young student at the threshold of his or her career if despite giving correct answer, the student suffers as a result of wrong and demonstrably erroneous key answer.”
These above two cases clearly show that SC has no right to delete the questions instead it can ask a committee/body for its verasity. Here, in our case, SC has done two errors. 1. deletion of 6 questions instead of correction; 2. Rejection of Review petitions. If the candidates file curative petition, definitely, it will be a blow to the present judges. Bcoz the Review petition of candidates ought to have valid grounds which were ignored by the present bench. bcoz they succeeded in both lower courts. And in Review petition, they have proved the malpractices of appsc. Letz see, what will happen???
APPSC is eager to file curative becoz they surely know that if the candidates' curative petition is accepted, then it will be a blow on their face. Bcoz they will expose the ill practices and disgusting attitude of the commission. They will also prove how it had submitted a cooked up table showing that only 209 are eligible to write mains. Most of us are not aware of these facts and believe that only 209 would qualify if the new list is drawn. It is in reality, the other way round. Around 800-1000 fall on each mark. So, there could be more than 2000 fresh canditates if the list is drawn. That is the reason why appsc has never talked about publishing individual marks list.It alone validates the cut-off. So none of us should believe what appsc says based on above facts. All the best...
@Anil, Just giving a preliminary glance at what you have said, I am assuming that there is another party to the case and their demand is fresh mains. And their demand is most potent which can stand the scrutiny of curative petition. My question. Has the SC in its last judgment and review considered the plea of this category?
Next, as someone earlier commented above, I also feel that this notification is as good as cancelled, taking into account, the complexities involved in dividing the merit list. This was pointed out in eenadu paper today.
Yes Anil....u r rightly said....SC has no right to delete the questions as it doesn't have expertise in that....so both interview candidates and those who write correct answers can challenge the decision and Quote the cases as a base....
So finally now it is the battle of fresh mains Vs Re mains. More Litigation. Lage raho...
BOTH CASES APPSC CURATIVE Petiton & THOSE WHO ARE DEMANDING FRESH MAINS WIll be DISMISSED BY SUPREME COURT IF THEY APPROACH SC
ONLY REMAINS IS THE FINAL OPTION
I WILL CLEARLY EXPLAIN SOON
@namrata. The concern here is not Re-mains or Fresh mains. Rather, it is the question of Justice. Would u accept whatever psc does, even if it is detrimental to most of our fellow aspirants? Just for the sake of our jobs, we can't screw the lives of thousands of others. I hv already posted the pros and cons of the figure,209. Still, u r unable to see the truth...
@likitcool, I pity u, my frnd. U r not sure, which side u belong to. U just come in b/w n say blaa, blaa.. Wht is dis. Hw can u say dat the Curative petitions would get dismissed without any valid reasons? Did u ever think of publication of Answer key by APPSC? But it happend in this case..Did u ever think of winning the case against PSC? Did u ever think of cancelation of Mains and interviews? But it happend in this case...Did u ever think of Re mains to all. What da hell r u talking abt. Just b practical...
Leaving aside, our own motives, one should definitely appreciate the efforts put on by those who filed the case. Isn't it, guys? Just ask ur frnds who hv benefited wid da key published in either Gr2 or any other exam. That is the outcome of this case by and large. Watz ur thought?
Anil garu, I am rather surprised at your uncharitable outburst against likitcool garu. His comments have to be taken in toto from the beginning. Likitcool has been explaining the nuances of the case with a fair degree of precision and with rationales. If you could please go through the earlier comments, I am sure you would definitely feel a tinge of remorse. Attack the argument, not the person.
Anil garu, There is merit in your words when you say that ,the present case has to be seen without motives. Finally it will only boil down to the interpretation of the SC. We have to make a dispassionate analysis. Every person thinks that what he/her thinks is called justice. Its best to leave Justice to the Judges. There is a saying. Repeat a lie a thousand times and it becomes the truth.
What SUPREME COURT MANUAL Says About CURATIVE PETITION
Even after dismissal of a review
petition under Article 137 of the Constitution, Supreme Court, may
entertain a curative petition and reconsider its judgment/order, in
exercise of its inherent powers in order to prevent abuse of its process,
to cure gross miscarriage of justice and such a petition can be filed
only if a Senior Advocate certifies that it meets the requirements of this
case. Such a petition is to be first circulated, in chambers, before a
Bench comprising of three senior most judges and such serving judges
who were members of the Bench which passed the judgment/order,
subject matter of the petition.
@anil, If appsc is lying about anything about the case, then it falls under the grave offence of perjury, which entirely is another matter.
I will draw attention to one point,When the concept of justice is talked, it has various interpretations,given the kaleidoscopic nature of the justice-seekers. Too much time has passed and like a hydra, many parties are surfacing adding to the vexatious nature of the case. Justice is heavily concentrated on the time-lag factor. Just as the aphorism goes, "Justice delayed is Justice denied", the universal characteristic of Justice would be to give an end to this.
CURATIVE PETITON IS TO CURE GROSS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
Consider APPSC : Committing MISTAKES Even at PRELIMS STAGE and Core Responsible for the Present Issue , Starting from AP Tribunal to Present Stage , APPSC Failed 5 TIMES BEFORE JUDICIARY .
EVEN APPSC IS HESITATING TO FILE CURATIVE PETITON
IF SUPREME COURT FAVOURS APPSC IN CURATIVE PETITION WHAT HAPPENS ?
THEN 209 CANDIDATES MOVE TO HIGHER BENCHES TO PROVE AUTHENTICITY OF 6 QUESTIONS WHICH IS IMPOSSIBLE
THE WAY REVIEW PETITION DISPOSED ON AUGUST 6,2014 WITH OUT ANY ARGUMENTS TO PROTECT THE INTERESTS OF INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES IS AN STRONG INDICATION AND PERFECT SOLUTION FOR REMAINS
CONSIDER INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES :
IF INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES ARE APPOINTED / SELECTED CANDIDATES THEN CURATIVE PETITION FAVOURS US
THAT IS THE OPINION OF JUDICIARY
WE ARE NOT APPOINTED CANDIDATES , AGAIN 300+ CANDIDATES WILL BE OUT OF THE GAME
CONSIDER THE CASE OF THOSE WHO ARE DEMANDING FRESH MAINS
OF 314 POSTS , APPSC HAS TO SELECT 1:50 Ie around 15700 for Mains exam
High court Ordered to Prepare Fresh list Based On 144 Correct Questions
Even It Advised APPSC to Consult UPSC in this Matter
SIMPLE LOIGIC
If 209 candidates wants to step in Means 209 CANDIDATES HAS TO STEP OUT (OUT OF MAINS FAILED + MAINS ABSENTEE + INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES ALSO)
INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES LIST WILL BE RESHUFFLED
So SC excluded MAINS ABSENTEE OF 7000 CANDIDATES and Ordered REMAINS FOR( 209 + MAINS FAILED + INTERVIEWED )
AS APPSC ALREADY CONDUCTED MAINS EXAM WITH 1: 50 RATIO , THEY GOT THE REQUISITE CANDIDATES FOR MAINS EXAM
THOUGH 800-1000 CANDIDATES FALL ON EACH MARK , ONLY 1: 50 is needed.
NOT ONLY 209 CANDIDATES BUT THOUSANDS WILL QUALIFY IF THE NEW LIST IS DRAWN
BUT 1 :50 is needed NOT MORE THAN THAT
SO IF ANY ONE FILES PETITION THAT GRAVE INJUSTICE HAPPENS TO THEM SEEKING FRESH MAINS , Based on above analysis FRESH MAINS ISSUE WILL BE DISMISSED
Consider a person born in 1984 and other in 1985 and if they got same mark , Person Born in 1984 Will be in the Ambit of 1 :50 and not the Person born in 1985
If evene after curative SC sticks to remains..the only way out is appsc shall cancel the notiification...this s clearly evident that appsc is not at all interested in conducting mains again..this shall be a blot on it..so it shall simply cancel the notiifcation and allote posts in this notification to respective states..as TSPSC is formed...and there are bright chances of notification being issued TG aspirants at advantage...as far as seemandhra is concerned chances of notification are bleak in near future...so after cancellation of notification seemandhra interviewd candidates and those fighting for remains can have a blame game forever on blogs like this....
@litlecool, Thanx for the lengthy analysis. You said 209 should go out inorder to give a way to 209. But my dear frnd, hw did conclude that only 209 will come in to picture, if the list is re drawn? Hw come u miss those who didn't even appear in Mains as U hv included 209, mains disqualified and interviewed ones. Plz check my previous explanation for this. U will cetainly get an idea. Don't think whatever psc says, is a Gospel. The authenticity of 6 questions was already proved in lower courts. It is this foolish judge, who is adamant and played with all of us. Had he sent all the questions to UPSC, then things would hv been settled once and for all. Another mistake that u hv made is High court did not order for fresh list for 144 questions, instead it asked UPSC secretary to send a report on the correct answers for 4 out of 6 questions. If these 6 questions are rectified and a fresh list is drawn for 150 questions, then whole scenario will change.
@Myjobmyright, Don't u think there are telangana people in those two groups, i.e,interviewed and mains not qualified. Hw can u pass such comments. don't u think there are also at loss as they hv crossed various stages in the recruitment. Y do u bring regional issues on a forum like this. Try to post valid and logical comments here.
@myjobmyright, neekidem aatalaa undaa? my job my right annavaadivi, kanisam nuvvu e group lo unnavo cheppu. Either side of aspirants, u certainly must not be der. Otherwise u wudnt hv demeaned our fellow frnds...
@vagdhati garu, I'm not against anyone. I wish all of us shud post valid comments. Nobody here knows what was the content in the Review petitions. And my friend,likit said that only Re-mains will be the outcome. Hw does he know dat? Had he gone thru the arguments held in SC when case was listed in Jan'14? Then, y does he make such fake comments? Now he says higher benches in SC....Can u plz ask him to stop this nusence. He doesn't know anything and simply copy,paste the info.from other websites. Wat do u say, boss?
Can I tell u the reasons for accepting the Curative petition if filed by the candidates, Go thru the following:
1. Both lower courts had opined that the key was erroneous and ought to receive the opinion of UPSC.
2. Solid evidences were provided by the candidates to prove their arguments against these 6 questions.
3. PSC had submitted a cooked up table in the court with 209 figure. This can be proven if the petitions had been accepted.
4. SC has done error in deleting these questions which was condemned in some earlier case. It ought to hv recommended the issue to UPSC or any other body.
5. Having known the above facts and having gone thru the Review petitions, It should have allowed for arguments. Only God knows, whether Mr.Jasthi has gone thoroughly or not.
6. If these facts are presented in Curative petition, it certainly wud b a blow to not only PSC but also to this so called Justice and the court itself. It wud clearly expose the reality hw the judiciary is functioning.
6. Having gone through these facts, Out ignorant and innocent fellow friends simply believe in 209 and say blaa..blaa..blaa....
If only all of us are SC judges, then that would be a ideal situation in this case.
@ANIL GARU
EITHER IT IS REMAINS OR FRESH MAINS OR DECLARING THE Results Immediately , THERE IS NO PROBLEM FOR ME
With hard work , I will secure my Position
AFTER DISPOSING THE REVIEW PETITION , THE ONLY WAY BEFORE APPSC IS CURATIVE PETITON OR REMAINS
AFTER DEFEATING 5 TIMES , STILL WE ARE IN ILLUSION SEARCHING FOR DIFFERENT OPTIONS
WITH IN 4 MONTHS IF CURATIVE PETITON ACCEPTS WE WILL GET APPOINTMENT LETTERS
IF CURATIVE PETITION DISPOSES FOR MANY (209 + MAINS FAILED + INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES THE REAL PROBLEM STARTS ie PREPARING FOR REMAINS )
ONLY SINCERE ASPIRANTS KNOW HOW TOUGH TO GATHER UPDATES
FOR EXAMPLE IF a Question Comes from S&T POLICY , WHAT YOU WRITE 2011 & 2012 INFORMATION or 2013 ,2014 Information
PLS GO THROUGH MY COMPILATION ON SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY POLICY
NO INSTITUTE IN ANDHRA PRADESH HAVE THIS FILE
YOU CAN VISIT ANY INSTITUTE IN AP , QUESTION CROSS CHECK , INQUIRE ABOUT THIS FILE , THEY DON’T HAVE
TO SAFE GUARD MY RANK , I AM GIVING ONLY 2013 UPDATES
STILL 50% OF UPDATES OF 2014 HAVE NOT GIVEN HERE
LIKE WISE I COLLECTED FOR
ESSAY
HISTORY
AP HISTORY
POLITY
ECONOMY
S& T
FOR EVERY TOPIC I PREPARED QUESTIONS LIKE THIS
TOPIC : SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY POLICY
A Large Ion Collider Experiment (ALICE)
Access to Knowledge for Technology Development and Dissemination (A2K+)
Bio Integrated Organic Farm Management (BIOFARM)
Building Industrial R&D and Common Research Facilities (BIRD)
Council for Science and Technology for Rural India (CSTRI)
Cyber security
Consolidation of UniversityNResearch, Innovation and Excellence (CURIE)
CSIR 800
Copolymer networks
‘Disha’ for women in science programme
Discovery of Higgs Boson –Indian Contribution
Draft National Innovation Act -2008
EMPOWER (Encouraging and Motivating Pursuit of World Class Exploratory Research)
Fund for Improvement of S&T Infrastructure in Higher Educational Institutions (FIST)
GIS software - GRAM++
Grid computing
Global mega projects
Grand Challenge Scheme
Human integrated computing.
Innovation in Science Pursuit for Inspired Research (INSPIRE) Programme
Indo STEPAN (Science & Technology Policy Asian Network)
Innovation Open Source Drug Discovery (OSDD)
India Inclusive Innovation Fund (IIIF)
India –Based Neutrino Observatory
International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor(ITER)
Kishore Vaigyanik Protsahan Yojana (KVPY)
Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory(LIGO)
Mega Science Projects
Meta University
Mechanical Vapour Compression Refrigeration (MVCR) technique.
National Action Plan for Climate Change (NAPCC)
National Atlas And Thematic Mapping Organisation
National Council for Science & Technology Communication (NCSTC)
National Data Sharing Accessibility Policy
National Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Compliance Monitoring Authority
National Innovation Council (NInC)
National Large Solar Telescope
National Mission for Sustaining Himalayan Ecosystem (NMSHE)
myjobmyright, Do u belong to Telengana Biddala Forum? Nice comments.you are a great role-model.
National Mission on Strategic Knowledge for Climate Change (NMSKCC)
New Millennium Indian Technology Leadership Initiative (NMITLI)
National Mission on Energy and Environment
National Mission Programme on Hybrid, Electric & Fuel Cell vehicles (NMPHEFC)
National Mission on Sustainable Habitat
National Mission for Enhanced Energy Efficiency
National Mission for Sustaining the Himalayan Ecosystem
National Mission for a Green India
National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture
National Mission on Food and Nutrition
National Monsoon Mission
National Mission on Affordable Health Care
National Mission on Education Through Information and Communication Technologies (NME-ICT)
National Mission on Strategic Knowledge for Climate Change
National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT)
National Mission on Use of ICT in Higher Education
National Mission on Bamboo Applications
National Mission on Teachers and Teaching
National Program on Carbon Sequestration Research (NPCSR)
National knowledge Commission
National Knowledge Network (NKN)
Natural Resources Data Management System (NRDMS)
National Research Development Corporation (NRDC)
National Science & Technology Management Information System (NSTMIS)
National Spatial Data Infrastructure
National Science & Technology Entrepreneurship Development Board (NSTEDB)
National Solar Mission
National Supercomputing Roadmap
National Water Mission
National Literacy Mission
Open Learning Programme in Entrepreneurship (OLPE)
Participation of Youth in Real-Time Observation to Benefit Education (PROBE)
Promotion of University Research and Scientific Excellence (PURSE)
Promoting Innovations in Individuals, Start-ups and MSMEs (PRISM)
Patent Acquisition and Collaborative Research and Technology Development (PACE)
PAN –India Missions
Peta – Scale Super Computing
RISK (Research Initiative to Scale New Knowledgebase)
Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facilities (SAIFs)
Spatial Decision Support Systems for management of watersheds (GRAM-SWAT)
Science For Equity Empowerment and Development (SEED)
Science & Technology Entrepreneurship Development (STED) Project
Science & Technology Entrepreneurship Park (STEP)
Science, Technology and Innovation Policy (STI) 2013
Science, Research and Innovation system for High Technology led path for India (SRISHTI)
Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB)
Solar Energy Research Initiative
State Science and Technology Programme (SSTP)
Science museums in India
Science city
Tissue engineering.
Technology Mission on Cotton
Technology mission
on Winning, Augmentation and Renovation (WAR) for water
Technology Information ,Forecasting and Assessment Council(TIFAC)
Technology Systems Development Programme (TSDP)
Technology Interventions for Disabled and Elderly (TIDE)
Technology Intervention for Mountain Eco-systems (TIME)
Technology Based Entrepreneurship Development Programme (TEDP)
Technology Business Incubators(TBI)
Technology Innovation Management Entrepreneurship and Information Services
Technology Enabled Villages (TECHVILS)
U-Excel (Unit for Excellence)
Vapour Absorption refrigeration (VAR) technique
What are the aims of the New Technology Policy? What steps are being taken to improve the standards of technical education?
The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research has established a number of laboratories for interacting with industry and development of indigenous technologies. Citing specific example, point out the significant achievements of CSIR in the last one decade.
What are Intellectual Property Rights? Why are Indian scientists concerned about the new patent regimes?
What do you understand by the term “Innovation”? Discuss the need for launching a national innovation policy in India.
What is innovation? What kind of economic compulsions in a country like India, you think, could really stimulate innovations?
Technology Innovations in the Government of India
What are the Important Technological Missions of India ? Add a note on Their Objectives
Write an Essay on National Literacy Mission
Enumerate the Policy Objectives in the Development of science and technology in India
Write a short note on the recent developments taking place in the most popular National solar Mission
Illustrate the National Policy on Science and Technology
Discuss the Role of technology Missions in India with a Suitable Example
What are the strategies of Development, transfer and diffusion of technology in our country
Discuss our national policy on Generation and management of intellectual Property
STILL 45 QUESTIONS ON S&T POLICY WAS SAFEGUARDED
I DOUBT THE SAME INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES WILL ONCE AGAIN SECURE THEIR POSITIONS AS THEY ARE WASTING THEIR TIME
@ANIL GARU
Pls come out of 2012 year ,prelims ,144 questions , High court , Judgements etc
We Got Only One Hurdle , Curative petition & then results or Remains
COME OUT OF FRESH MAINS ILLUSION
ONLY HARD WORK PAYS . I CANT SHARE EVERY QUESTION HERE AS IT AFFECTS MY RANK IN FUTURE
I SINCERELY WISH U MUST ALSO SUCCED IN FORTH COMING EXAMS
Don’t Look Back Every time You Will be there .
@Likit, I could not make anything out of ur long Essay. What all u r trying to do is to project that u r the most eligible candidate for Gr-1. Fine, All da best. But what if the notification gets cancelled? We all will prepare for prelims, but u alone wud be reading ur own mains material. Kudos, When u r so mean to secure high marks than others, y did u copy n paste all da above stuff? just keep in for urself. Oh, u want to project as if u r the master of Mains. Isn't it? Did anyone of us ask u for such info. Simply mugging up the syllabus n c&P'ng the entire syllabus won't fetch ur gud results. Instead, u shud approach someone who r working hard in a right direction. Best of Luck. Plz don't waste ur time n money by sitting on net for hours together. bye
@Likit, i just don't understand one thing. If u r so constructive and systematice in the preparation, y didn\t u get into service in the previous 3 recruitments? U wud hv definitely secured top place. Isn't it? O.K, I got it now. All these years, u might hv been collecting such stuff even at the cost of not attending the exams. Grt! By da way, U just said dat u r trying to secure ur rank. Hw can u assure dat? Plz let us know ur rank so dat we can prepare within our limits. Bcoz we are simple humans n not super humans like u who can go on typing whatever they have irrespective of others' interests. Bye,
hey Likit, Instead of all this stuff, plz give ur answers along the authentic evidence for those 6 questions which are in dispute. That's all I want. Hope u won't disappoint me.
@Likit, Had u done a little favor by giving such evidence to PSC for those 6 questions, all of us wudn't hv been in dis situation. Watz ur thought, boss?
@Namrata, Just for the sake of discussion, I would like to ask u one thing. As we all know, there are nirbhaya cases being filed. So, u want to close/put an end to the case irrespective of the outcome and even at the luxury of releasing those culprits. Letz take another instance wherein the same case is pending for abt 2yrs and then at the end, the culprits are punished by way of imprisonment/Death penalty. Then also, wud u say, justice delayed, is justice denied??? As u rightly said, everything has its own interpretations n implications. Any ways, best of luck.
@ANIL GARU , I AM ALREADY IN GOVT SERVICE
Never wrestle with pigs. You get dirty and the pig likes it
@Sirius, are o boshidike, evarni pig antunnav, chuthye, ikkada evaru alaantivaru leru. Probably u r da one, who has come now to lick the remainings stuff. Idiot, Der is a common thing b/w u n a pig. U know wt? pigs never luk at sky. U also never do dat. I respect all our frnds and I value their comments. Who da hell r u, ass...? Wat do u think of urself? Hv ur ever applied for Gr-1? I don't think so. U must be an idiot working as a sweeper/vagabond who can just dream n do nothing else. It's just simple to sit bfore system n type watever u think. Do u atleaat know who Sirius is in our history? i'm sorry, hw can u know dat thing....Hv tight sleep, c u tomorrow. bye
@likit, if u r in Govt.service, u wud hv not passed such comments. With due respect,may i know ur designation?
@likit n vagdati garu, c hw such an idiot like sirius is posting comments.hv v ever demeaned others? v just condemned their comments only. But dis bugger is like ebola virus which has no limits n can just pass on its virus everywhere...
@Namrata, mee spandana enti? u don't speak now. U just bombard on my comments, that's all. Am I da only one who can condemn such comments? don't u hv self respect? hw can u spare such a moron who can speak whatever he wishes? I pity u guys,,,Whatever we hv discussed, has been in a healthy manner, that too with valid points. Suddenly, this so called star, sirius comes in, n says blaa, blaa, blaa, What is dis???
ikkada telengana biddalu entha mandhi unnaru? identify yourselves.
Hi I follwed this blog past one year, I never find such type of comments @ sirus or virus. @ anil garu Don't bother such comments definetely condumnd.
@raju, thanx my frnd. I hope people on this forum wud at least react now!
@ANIL GARU
The commission had initially cleared 16,426 candidates in the preliminary examination
Initially 16,426 Candidates
After reconsidering the objections to the preliminary examination key 845 candidates were rendered ineligible and 1,201 additional candidates included
S0 16,426 – 845 + 1,201 = 16782
Around 184 students of the 845 were allowed to appear for the examination following an order by the tribunal.
SO 16782 + 184 = 16966
SO TOTAL 16966 CANDIDATES WERE ELIGIBLE TO WRITE MAINS EXAM IN SEPTEMBER , 2012
LATER CASE WAS FILED IN TRIBUNAL FOR 6 WRONG QUESTIONS AND AFTER FROM TRIBUNAL , HIGH COURT , SUPREME COURT THE LITIGATION WENT FOR 2 YEARS
SUPREME COURT ON AUGUST 6 ,2014 FOR 3RD CONSECUTIVE TIME DISPOSED REVIEW PETITION FILED BY APPSC ALLOWING 209 CANDIDATES WHO MISSED MAINS EXAMS + MAINS FAILED CANDIDATES + INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES FOR REMAINS (EXCLUDING MAINS ABSENTEE CANDIDATES)
16966 CANDIDATES + 209 Candidates in Total 17175 were allowed
Notified posts were 314
Considering 1 :50 Ratio
314 * 50 = 15700
APPSC Allowed More Candidates to Write Mains Exam
So no question of FRESH MAINS , Though For Every Mark 800-1000 People ,APPSC HAD ALREADY GOT REQUIRED CANDIDATES
ONLY REMAINS
@likit, thanx for da info. But y r u hesitating to answer my query? Hw r u so assured dat only 209 will qualify? i hv already given da details reg. dat no. Still u believe in wat psc says. I pity u. All da best!
by da way, the recent news is that da candidates are going to file da Curative petition. Letz wait for a while...
ANIL , WHO IS GOING TO FILE CURATIVE PETITION
APPSC ON BEHALF OF INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES ?
INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES BY THEMSELVES
?
PRELIM CANDIDATES WHO ARE DEMANDING FRESH MAINS ?
PLS CLARIFY
HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY TO ALL
Hi Friends,
I find some observations which will help our case,
1). Supreme Court in its earlier decision on January 21st, mentioned that 2 exams(mains) is unjustful to the candidates. But in recent days some exams like CAT, SBI PO Exam, IBPS clerical....etc candidates are getting different papers in different weeks eventhough they are appearing for the same job. In CAT, GRE exams those candidates who appears on same day and sit sidebyside also get different papers. In our Civil Services exam also every candidate choose different optional of his own intrest. In all the cases by preparing different set of papers of same difficulty level, the examiners are protect the merit. So in our case also APPSC professors can give papers of same difficulty level and protect the merit as said by the court.
2). More over there is a lot of difference between Academic exams and Civils services, Group - 1 mains kind of exams. In these kind of exams instead of testing merely candidates knowledge, they test his approach and response towards Society and its problems. So by giving another set of papers also we can find the above said qualities.
3). By ordering APPSC to delete the 6 questions without considering the report given by expert commitee supremecourt did a mistake in our case. To counter this we can Quote the following case of Haryana Public Service Commission which was given by one of our friend.....
H.P.Public Service Commission Vs Mukesh Thakur & Anr. On 25th May 2010; Civil Appeal No. 907 of 2006”- Para No.12, Extracted below:
“In the facts and circumstances of the aforesaid case, three basic questions arise for consideration of this Court:- i) as to whether it is permissible for the court to take the task of Examiner/Selection Board upon itself and examine discrepancies and inconsistencies in the questions paper and valuation thereof.”
“It is a matter of chance that the High court was examining the answer sheets relating to law. Had it been other subjects like physics, chemistry and mathematics, we are unable to understand as to whether such a course could have been adopted by the High court”
“Therefore, we are of the considered opinion that such a course was not permissible to the High court.”
One more case which is also relavant to our case is
Manish Ujwal And Ors. Vs Maharishi Dayanand Saraswati University on 16th August 2005” - Para No. 9, Extracted below:
“The High Court has committed a serious illegality in coming to the conclusion that "it cannot be said with certainty that answers to six questions given in the key answers were erroneous and incorrect". As already noticed, the key answers are palpably and demonstrably erroneous.”
@009, Thanx for ur info. I didn't get what exactly r u trying to convey? You are right that the courts have no right to question the varasity of a question in an examination. But, it doesn't matter whether there is a fresh mains or second mains, unless and until the merit is not being compramised with the erroneous key. All our frnds are talking abt those who have been interviewed and those who just couldn't clear the Mains. Has anyone thought of those who have sufferred due to this key. They could be around 4000. Who will fight for them? Definitley not u, me and these so called intelligents. Had they missed the chance with that key, then they would hv know the pain. Now, all of us are in safe position. So, we keep quite and talk abt our rigths. But all of us should accept the fact that psc has done mistake and most os us have cleared due to that erroneous key only. Now, who's talking abt morality over here???? come on, guys... speak out...
We are living in a society and all of us are humans. So, letz hv some morality. Had any of ur relative not cleared prelims due to this erroneous key, then u wud hv talked differently. But now, u talk abt ur rights, Isn't it? I'm sorry to say dat, having qualified with that erroneous key wudn't make us eligible to write Mains or attend the interview. I know for sure that most of our frnds are worried abt the result just bcoz they already knew which post r they going to get? I know this doesn't sound nice but we should accept the truth too. If we don't hv that much courage, then what for, are we made of??? I'm sorry to say all this stuff. But at some point, we should be honest at least to ourselves. I am sure that people are gonna bombard me but at least i hv that courage. Y don't u hv it in u, guys???? All of us know that people hv swindled money by way of holding meetings in basheerbagh clubs, filing cases etc. when they cleary knew that nothing was gonna happen? Most of us were fools who contributed enough amount to fill in their pockets. And they were the ones who used this forum a few months ago, as If they were the saviors of our lives. Come on, guys...Accept the truth. At least we should praise those who have fought hard to expose the reality and face of PSC to society. I ams surprised why none of us reply when I say that they are ones who initiated the publication of key in the history of APPSC and thousands hv benefited out of dat. Still, u maintain hypocracy, Grt,,,Bravo, my frnds...
Where r u Vagdhati, Namrata, Raj, Likit??? Come on guys, speak out! Letz talk the truth only.
I am also an interview candidates. I expressed my view about writing re mains when the first SC judgement came, but some body scolded me. This is not a complex case. Recently my friend purchased a plot. After he got patta, sister of seller filed a partition suit and she took half of property. now my friend is begging money from seller. Justice starts from where wrong happens. Same thing in our case also. Nothing will happen except wasting money. This is not a case like Does law and order completely belongs to state or not? Can Union issue an ordinance of transferring some area from one state to another without considering two affected states?Better option in out case is asking for remains. At least we can get another chance. Bifurcation should not affect people, SC in EAMCET case, so it is duty of APPSC to conduct exam and successor states has to take them in 58:42.
ANIL , WHO IS GOING TO FILE CURATIVE PETITION
APPSC ON BEHALF OF INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES ?
INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES BY THEMSELVES
?
PRELIM CANDIDATES WHO ARE DEMANDING FRESH MAINS ?
PLS CLARIFY
Likit...what ever u said is correct...we should think about those who suffered with wrong key...they are 209 not 4000. Dont think that APPSc would have given some wrong number to court....no govt body can take such risk (especially with courts). Apart from these what i m trying to say is "two mains is not wrong why because somany exams in this days are happening with more than one set of papers(for the same job) due to various reasons. In our case mistake was done by APPSC not by Interviewed ones. We hav no role in wrong key issue. So our intrests should also be protected. "As per our indian law no innocent should be punished at any cost". Thats why mains for 209 is justifible.
@009, I pity u for ur ignorance. Do u still believe in appsc? if u want, I will send the evidence for 209 which was filed in SC by PSC. I agree with ur words," no innocent should be punished at any cost". But who is innocent here in ur opinion. Are those who hv been striving hard to expose the brutal nature of psc by proving dat it is an erroneous key? Are those who hv benefited out of dat key n enjoying da credit of being qualified in mains/interview with that faulty key? Do u still claim to be the real eligible candidate to get the post? Then, ask ur fellow mates, or siblings or any of those who hv benefited out of the publication of answer key by appsc. Then, come for the arguments here. O.K.
Does APPSC have the right to cancel the notification? I mean does it have a legal or constitutional backing to this. Has it cancelled any notification in the past?
If yes, then under what circumstances can it do this?
Can someone through light on this aspect please?
If we consider the two probable future actions of APPSC,
1) Filing a Curative petition.
2)Cancellation of notification.
These two courses of action will not go hand in hand, as such they do not denote contiguous line of thinking. Each action is antithetical to the other. Everything here on is a grey area. Everything is possible and our honorable SC and APPSC will quote some arcane administrative cum judicial and legal philosophy to reaffirm their final judgment
@NAVIN KIRAN GARU
APPSC GROUP1 NOTIFICATION WONT GET CANCELLED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS
The commission had initially cleared 16,426 candidates in the preliminary examination
AFTER THAT THE LIST WAS RESHUFLED 3 TIMES BECAUSE OF WRONG QUESTIONS
FIRST TIME : 845 candidates were rendered ineligible and 1,201 additional candidates included From the List of 16,426 BECAUSE OF APPSC MISTAKE Ordered by TRIBUNAL
SECOND TIME : Around 184 students of the 845 were allowed to appear for the examination following an order by the tribunal SECOND TIME
THIRD TIME : 209 CANDIDATES WERE ALLOWED TO WRITE REMAINS ,AFTER DISPOSING THE RE VIEW PETITION ON AUGUST 6 ,2014
AS APPSC HAD MADE MISTAKES IT HAS TO ABIDE BY SUPREME COURT AND REMAINS WILL BE CONDUCTED SHORTLY
EVEN THOUGH APPSC FILES CURATIVE PETITION IT WILL BE DISPOSED , I WILL COME WITH CLEAR EXPLANATION SOON
@likitcool, Keeping aside your reasons for a moment, there was no particular instruction nor directive from SC to PSC saying that the examination should not be cancelled. In that way, the PSC is well within its right to cancel the notification, if it wants.
@semplinath garu
Supreme Court said that there will be age relaxation in favour of the candidates if any, who have crossed the age bar, because of the litigation.
SUPREME COURT CLEARLY SAID THAT NOTIFICATION WONT GET CANCELLED
REFER JAN 20, 2014 JUDGEMENT
ANIL , WHO IS GOING TO FILE CURATIVE PETITION
APPSC ON BEHALF OF INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES ?
INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES BY THEMSELVES
?
PRELIM CANDIDATES WHO ARE DEMANDING FRESH MAINS ?
PLS CLARIFY
SC saying about age relaxation is only worthwhile to the said conditions. Interpretation in any other way is way off target. Did SC say "PSC shall not canclel this notification" in any of its judgments?
@Sempli, I agree with ur point. Likit always makes illogical statements. PSC has never been interested in conducting the exam. Had it been really intended, then who stopped it in conducting the exam, irrespective of state bifurcation etc issues? It wudn't hv been so tough if u compare the situation at the time of last mains held in 2011. Had it really thought of deleting the 6 questions, then it wudn't hv sent the bulk, fake material evidence to UPSC/ It wud hv simply asked in Tribunal and hc to delete the questions. It didn't do so. We all know dat...Even now, it is projecting as if it is protecting our interests. That's bullshit. The curative petition will at least take 3 months to be served at the bench. By that time, TSPSC would come into picture. The posts would be divided as a result of the cancellation of notification. APPSC has full rights to do so. You guys are making this simple issue, a complex one. My dear frnds, Wht was the intention of psc behind going to SC? If it really had thought of hurrying up, then it wud hv waited for the hc judgment soon after the report of upsc was delivered. Another astonishing fact is that, APPSC has claimed Rs 80 lakhs from the Govt. against the expenditure for legal proceedings only in SC. What do u say, frnds??? I heard the news that the candidates hv been fighting from Tribunal to HC r going to file the Curative only to safeguard the interests of larger section of aspirants. So that in future, none of the State PSCs would dare to play with the lives of aspirants as was done in our case by appsc. Letz wait n C...
ANIL WHY YOU ARE MAKING ALL FALSE STATEMENTS AND MISLEADING
DONT YOU KNOW ONLY THOSE AGGRIEVED BY REVIEW PETITION (ie APPSC ) ONLY CAN FILE CURATIVE PETITION
HOW CAN CANDIDATES CAN FILE CURATIVE PETITION ?
YOU MADE 3 STATEMENTS 1.FRESH MAINS 2. NOTIFICATION CANCELLATION 3.CANDIDATES CURATIVE PETITION ALL ARE WRONG . PROBABLY YOU ARE NOT FOLLOWING SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT
ATLEAST DO YOU KNOW THAT ON AUGUST 6 ,2014 SC DISPOSED APPSC REVIEW PETITION AND ORDERED REMAINS
Likit cool garu's observations have been always right in this case. But in this point, sempli nath garu's point is correct. Unless and until sc gives a order to appsc, appsc may cancel the notification. If sc says not to cancel, then appsc cannot cancel.
As it stands, it is either re-mains which has a probability of 80 percent or appsc can scrap the notification. There is nothing more to be said on this case.
@sampathkumar, Now I hv learnt hw appsc can fool any body by luking at ur idiotic comment. Did u know that 772&773/2014 cases belong to the review petitions filed by those candidates. As their petitions were denied, they r going to file Curative. Only a fool like u can say that SC has ordered for Re-Mains. It just rejected all the Review petitions and opined dat their judgment had nothing to be reviewed. Do u know hw Jus.Chalameswar reacted in SC when it was heard first? Y do guys like u make such silly comments by having a cup of tea in ashoknagar and chatting with fools like u and do blaa, blaa,,blaaa over here. Mind ur sense before attacking others. Anyways, u r never n ever gonna make it. Then, y r u so bothered???
I still stick on to my word. It'll be cancellation of notification by appsc. If u hv any other reliable info, just let me know.
I still stick on to my word. It'll be cancellation of notification by appsc. If u hv any other reliable info, just let me know.
@Anil , Already I am Interviewed Candidate
In the First Prelim List of 16,426 , Though Your Name was Not There ,Don’t Worry
In the Second Prelim List of 1,201 , Though Your Name was Not There ,Don’t Worry
In the Third Prelim List of 184 , Though Your Name was Not There ,Don’t Worry
BUT IN THE 4TH LIST OF 209 CANDIDATES , PROBABLY YOUR NAME WILL BE THERE , DON’T WORRY
SC ORDER
We have considered the averments in the review petitions. Having regard to the facts and issues involved, in our opinion, no case for review is
made out. There is no error in the impugned order (Order in Hand or Order Under Dispute or Order under Litigation )
@ANIL , FOR ALL THESE DAYS YOU PREDICTED FRESH MAINS AS THOUSANDS WILL BE BENEFITTED RATHER THAN 209
FRESH MAINS ,FRESH MAINS , FRESH MAINS FOR ONE MONTH ,
FINALLY STICKING TO CANCELLATION OF EXAMS ,NONE WILL BELIEVE YOU , YOU ARE CONSTANTLY CHANGING FRESH MAINS , CANCELLATION , FRESH
MAINS , CANCELLATION ?
@Sampath, I never changed my word. I still stick on to wat I say. I already told that PSC is not intersted in conducting or declaring the results. But I wish it shud do so. I said both pros and cons of the exam. I already made it very clear that it's not the question of fresh mains or re-mains, rather we should think from the court's/petitioners' point of view. As far as the cancelation of exam is concerned, It is definitely going to happen, keeping in mind how psc behaves....
@ANIL
HOW CAN YOU SAY PSC IS “NOT INTERESTED” IN CONDUCTING OR DECLARING THE RESULTS ?
Its APPSC’s “INABILITY” For Not Conducting or Declaring Results
BECAUSE The ORDER HAS TO COME FROM SUPREME COURT
What to Think From the Court/Petitioner Point of View ?
TAKE PRELIMS AGGRIEVED ASPIRANTS
What will be their View , They won 5 TIMES From TRIBUNAL TO SC , They are ready to write Remains
Do you think that they Fought Since sep 2012 to August 6 ,2014 JUST TO GET CANCELL THE NOTIFICATION ?
MANY ASPIRANTS MAY CROSS 36 AGE LIMIT . THEY NEVER LOOSE A CHANCE TO PROVE THEIR MERIT
TAKE APPSC CASE
HAD IT GOT THE RIGHT TO CANCELL THE NOTIFICATION ?
IF SO IT WOULD HAVE DONE 2 YEARS BACK
THEN WHY IT PLANS FOR CURATIVE PETITION IF IT CAN CANCELL THE NOTIFICATION ?
THE WORST SUFFERERS ARE INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES , THEY CAN PROVE ANY TIME AS THEY HAD DONE EARLIER
RECENT SC VERDICTS PROVES THAT BIFURCATION IS NOT AN ISSUE
TWO STRONG GOVTS ON BOTH SIDES ARE COORDINATING TO CONDUCT EXAMS IN NEAR FUTURE
PLS GO THROUGH NOTIFICATION , 90 % OF POSTS ARE ZONAL & MULTIZONAL POSTS , REMAINING POSTINGS WILL BE GIVEN AS PER ART 371 D
Hi guys why r all kept in silence, post genuine news and comment decently..
ESSENTIAL TEXT BOOKS FOR APPSC GROUP 1 REMAINS
TOPIC : DATA INTERPRETATION
SUB TOPIC : STATISTICS (WEIGHTAGE 20 MARKS)
1.N G DAS
2.Gupta & Kapoor
3.Saxena
4.Goyal & Sharma
5.Qazi Shoyab
6.A K Sharma
7.Jain , S C Agarwal
8.Statistics Made Simple : Chronicle Publications
The Topic Statistics Include
a.Tabulation
b.Central Tendency
c.Measures of Dispersion
d.Probability
e.Association of Attributes
f.Index Number
g.Correlation & Regressions
Likitcool garu, this is an exhaustive list. Would appreciate if you can post one or two important books for each subject.
I may be asking for too much, but it would be really helpful if you can suggest any material or notes which is ready-made and which covers most of the points for any answer/topic.
This would be of great help to me as my job does not give me time to read and prepare notes.
@NAVIN GARU
FOR STATISTICS APPSC GAVE THE FOLLOWING REFERENCE BOOKS
1. Fundamentals of Mathematical Statistics by S.C. Gupta and V.K. Kapoor –
Sultan Chand & Sons.
2. Statistical Methods by S.P. Gupta – Sultan Chand & Sons.
3. Programmed Statistics (Questions – Answers) by B.L. Agarwal – New Age
International Publishers.
4. Statistics by Elhance.
BUT YOU CONSIDER 2008 QUESTION
Question : A GIVEN MACHINE IS ASSUMED TO DEPRECIATE 40% IN VALUE ?
This Question was taken from N G Das (Combined Statistics )
You Consider Other Question from 2008 Question paper
Question:Lives of Two Models of Refrigerators ?
This Question was given WORD BY WORD FROM UPSC PREVIOUS QUESTION PAPER
SO IT IS BETTER TO PREPARE NOTES FROM THAT PARTICULAR TEXT BOOKS
AFTER MY RESEARCH NO INSTITUTE IN AP HAVE MAINTAINED HIGH STANDARD AND CAN HELP US
BEST THING IS TO PREPARE NOTES
@likit, y r u in da business of panicking others? If u hv ur notes, keep it wid u. Don't ever share wid others.. Elhans, SC Gupta and SC gupta along wid RS Agarwal will suffice for Stats. Don't ever try to scare others wid ur so called cumbursome material...
@ANIL
AS YOU HAVE NOT WRITTEN MAINS , YOU DONT KNOW THE STANDARD OF THE QUESTIONS
CAN YOU SHOW ME THE ABOVE MENTIONED QUESTIONS IN APPSC PRESCRIBED BOOKS . YOU CANT , NOR ANY ONE
HAVE REALISTIC APPROACH
NO ONE IS CONSIDERING YOU AND YOUR OPINIONS
SINCERE ASPIRANTS KNOW WHAT THE REALITY IS
@LIKITCOOL,IN HOW MANY MONTHS FROM NOW RE-MAINS WILL BE CONDUCTED.
ANDHRA PRADESH GOVT INCREASED AGE LIMIT TO 40 YEARS (DSC AND ALL OTHER Govt Jobs Except some Technical jobs)
The Same will be followed By Telangana , as it is the DEMAND FROM OU STUDENTS
SOURCE ANDHRA JYOTHI NEWS PAPER
SOON I WILL POST ORIGINAL GO
Yes its correct.
can any one plz help me suggesting S&T books for mains
start with vijetha publications.
హైదరాబాద్, సెప్టెంబర్ 1 (ఆంధ్రజ్యోతి): ఎయిడెడ్ లెక్చరర్లు, టీచర్ల పదవీ విరమణ వయసును 58 ఏళ్ల నుంచి 60 ఏళ్లకు పెంచుతూ ఆంధ్రప్రదేశ్ మంత్రివర్గం నిర్ణయం తీసుకొంది. డీఎస్సీ సహా ప్రభుత్వ ఉద్యోగాల నియామక పరీక్షలకు దరఖాస్తు చేసుకోవడానికి గరిష్ఠ వయో పరిమితిని 40 ఏళ్లకు పెంచారు. విశాఖలో కేంద్ర ప్రభుత్వ సంస్థ ఎన్టీపీసీ నాలుగు వేల మెగావాట్ల థర్మల్ విద్యుత్ కేంద్రం ఏర్పాటు చేయడానికి 1200 ఎకరాల భూమి కేటాయిస్తూ నిర్ణయం తీసుకొన్నారు. రూ.20 వేల కోట్లతో దీనిని నిర్మించనున్నారు.
age limit 40 ki penchadam tho, next step notification cancellation.
AGE Limit had Increased to Utilise Aspirants in the Development of Both AP and Telangana
It is an Opportunity for Many to be a Part of Administration in NEW States
Neither ANDHRA GOVT nor TELANGANA Govt IS NOT AT ALL INVOLVED IN GROUP 1 REMAINS ISSUE
THE ISSUE IS BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONAL BODY AND JUDICIARY
NEITHER APPSC NOR SUPREME COURT DO NOT HAVE RIGHT TO CANCELL THE NOTIFICATION
BOTH GOVT'S WILL INVOLVE IN ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS LIKE EXAM DATES CONDUCTING THE REMAINS ETC
Likitgaru @ Hifrnds i have one doubt regarding age relaxation,expet andra jyoty paper, all i.e.eenadu,sakshi etc.are publishing this age relaxation only DSC.pls guys give some clarity on this.
dsc ki relaxation isthe, migatha vatiki icchi natte...
I.A. NO. 4 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9140 OF 2013. pending ani chupitundi.
@SEMPLI
DO CHECK THE FOLLOWING CASE NO OF APPSC CIVIL APPEAL 2013 .THEY ARE DISPOSED
CIVIL APPEAL : 9141 - 2013 - DISPOSED
CIVIL APPEAL : 9142 -2013 DISPOSED
CIVIL APPEAL : 9143 -2013 DISPOSED
to all 2012 mains written candidates, happy 2 years anniversary.
STILL 12 DAYS TO GO FOR TWO YEARS ANNIVERSARY
EXAMS HELD BETWEEN SEP 18 2012 - SEP 28 2012
@ ANIL , ANY NEWS ABOUT STUDENTS FILING A CURATIVE PETITION
Heard this news yesterday that three curative petitions were filed by preliminary students. Mallik Sir also told the same.
I have a doubt. why 3 curatives have been petitioned?
@ namrata answer for ur quory.
http://www.allinterview.com/showanswers/76018.html
curative petitions kottha judges repu chustharu ata news express channel lo vastundi. results declares chestundru. interview candidates ki jayam palikindi biddalara
@namrata,who is this mallik sir? where has he come from? why should we value his statement?
@Ramji, neelaanti cheap psycho fellows undabatte mana desham ilaa thagaladindi. r u da MD of that express channel? repu results ivvakapothe nee thala kosesthaavaa? idiot,,enduku sollu vaagudu.burra unte edainaa panikocche pani chei, anthe gaani ilaa thamaashaalu cheyaku.
@Charan, nuvvokadivi, adigindi okataithe nuvve cheppedi inkokati. aa case different. Reservation issue lo nijangaa jarigindi ento kanukko. anthegaani copy and paste cheyabaaku.eppudaithe happy 2nd anniversary annavo neekentha theeto artham avuthondi.
@sampath, I heard the news that the original petitioners in Tribunal hv filed the curative. I'm not sure abt psc and interviewed candidates. someone should tell this. try to find out fm outside. We can see hw best the guys r here on this forum...making fun of our exam, career and the discussions..Alaas!!!
@charan, nee penta brain tho, chettha ideas tho enduku andarni samputhunnav? enti, S&T ki vijetha sadavaalaa? sanka naakipotharu. naa frnd alaage chadivi 59 thechukunnaadu. nuvvu kudaa ade pani chei. all da best..
@likit, nuvvu sincere aspirant vaa? nijangaa aithe ilaa janaalanu mosam cheyavu. Elhans, SC and SP publications along with RS agarwal paper 5 ki saripothai. adi koodaa theliyaka enduku public ni mosam chestunnav/ purugulu padi pothaav,,,,anduke service raaka ilaa ee forum lo naakuthoo unnav..inkaa buddhi raale?
@likit, 2008 stats lo depreciation question gurinchi edho vaaginav., daaniki simple arithmetic knowledge unte simple/compound interest lo cheyocchu. konchem descriptive gaa raasthe chaalu. daaniki edo sollu cheppi nee thaathalu raasina books enduku rudduthunnav/neekemainaa commission vasthundaa? asalu last mains lo neekentha score vacchindo cheppu. appudu maatlaadathaa. antha burrunnodive aithe stats lo 145 minimum vacchi eepaatiki service lo undaali. mari alaa jaragalede, emm???
evadiki vaadu thochindi raasesi enduku innocent frnds ni chedagoduthunnaru /asalu meelo entha mandi last mains clear chesaaru/ entha mandi interview attend chesaaru? guts unte h.t nos.ivvandi. appudu discuss cheyandi. anthegaani intha manchi forum ni gabbu pattinchakandi.
@ ANIL
What Likit Garu told is Exactly True about Maths Questions
Even i Verified
As you are Prelim Failed Candidate you Dont It
YOUR VIEW ON Notification Cancellation is TOTALLY FALSE AND MISLEADING
SHOCKING FACT AS APPSC HAVE NOT REVEALED THE LIST OF 209 CANDIDATES EVEN THOSE WHO FILED THE CASE AGAINST APPSC DO NOT KNOW IF THEY FALL WITH IN THE AMBIT OF 209 LIST
WITH ALL YOUR SHAKSPEAR WRITINGS ON THE BLOG WHY CAN'T YOU APPROACH THE PETITIONER LAWYERS AND SUBMIT YOUR FACTS TO THEM AND STRENGTHEN THE CASE?
YOU ARE SEVERLY DEPRESSED BY CONSTANT FAILURE . DECLARING THE RESULTS OR REMAINS PROBABLY MAY CREATE DISTURBANCE IN YOU
HAVE YOU EVER APPROACHED RTI AND FILED PETITION TO DISCLOSE PRELIM RESULT ?
SEP 2,2012 - SEP ,2 2014 TWO YEARS HAD PASSED , WHAT YOU ARE DOING ? IF THERE IS TRUTH IN YOU ?
CHECK THE BLOG FROM BEGINNING , YOUR WORDS /YOUR MIND / TOTALLY DEPRESSED
DONT GIVE A STATEMENT THAT NOTIFICATION WILL GET CANCELL
EXPLAIN WHY NOTIFICATION WILL CANCELL ?
JUST VISIT SINCERE ASPIRANTS AT O U who are preparing for Remains .They will tell you
DOING JUSTICE ME , NOT DOING INJUSTICE
209 + MAINS WRITTEN CANDIDATES + INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES ARE READY TO WRITE REMAINS
IF EVERY ONE IS READY , WHO CARES YOU ?
Post a Comment