APPSC FILES MODIFICATION PETITION IN SC (NEWS DATED: 02/11/2013)
(APPSC Material & Online test Quiz on Indian latest GK and latest current affairs questions 2013, General Knowledge questions and answers on recent current affairs 2012, Science quiz mpsc, tnpsc, kpsc, current affairs questions and answers, current affairs 2013 quiz, current affairs 2013, 2012 for competitive and bank exams, general knowledge questions 2013 for government jobs in Andhra Pradesh, General Awareness for Bank and All competitive exams, Banking Awareness material with general studies mcq bits practice test. modern history, medieval history, ancient history notes for civil services, Indian Geography notes, APPSC Cutoff marks & Results, banking awareness, Appsc previous papers, general knowledge questions, geography GK, general knowledge quiz, gk quiz, quiz questions, general knowledge questions and answers, gk question, gk questions with answers, general knowledge quiz with answers, World Geography for objective general knowledge, current general knowledge, online general knowledge quiz questions, Indian general knowledge)
APPSC GROUP
1 Material - Useful Links - Full Notes
|
Ancient India Complete Short notes (Class Notes)
Indian History - Descriptive Topics for Competitive APPSC Exams Andhra Economy Full Material for Group 1 & Group 2 (TM Notes -80% updated) Indian Polity Notes - All Topics including Quiz Census 2011 - Complete Notes for General Awareness (Class Notes) Disaster Management - Telugu Medium -Full notes for APPSC (Class Notes) Current Affairs from January 2012 to September 2013 Quantitative Aptitude Full Material Mensuration Full Material |
About the Blog: Provides APPSC Material for APPSC Group 1 Notification 2014 and APPSC Group 2 Notification 2014, Appsc upcoming notifications, government jobs in Andhra Pradesh
Advertisements
1,846 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 601 – 800 of 1846 Newer› Newest»APPSC to issue apology to non-interview caNDIDATES AND RELEASE RESULTS.
good news but why only results of 150 posts to be declared?
BECAUSE ONLY 300 ATTENTED INTERVIEWS INSTEAD OF 600+
@likitcool, you are rong. All 600 candidates attended interview.
@charangaru , we know that 600+ attended for interview .
Friends they told that in July 3rd week there will be hearing about the case.. What's wrong not even a single move in the court.. And times also lagging...any info Plz
..
It is in doses that the ammunition of power that needs to wrecked on the unassuming masses and create a system where the privileged few trample and degrade the rights of those who are at the bottom of the food chain. Can the fury of interview cands be unleashed in the form of systemic hartals and picketing of SC. I wish I am not the only one in championing the cause of the forbidden fruit of a job at state level. We need to vigilant in this case of extreme injustice that is prevailing in the land of the telugus and make a forceful attempt to exact justice from the claws of the moneyed class and the vested interests who are prolonging the case to make money. Do we not have the requisite strength of intellectual capital to make a just stand in our case? Have we become a band of desperate degenerates who no longer have the capacity to fire their inner cylinders and have become a shadow of their former former selfs.
It is in doses that the ammunition of power that needs to wrecked on the unassuming masses and create a system where the privileged few trample and degrade the rights of those who are at the bottom of the food chain. Can the fury of interview cands be unleashed in the form of systemic hartals and picketing of SC. I wish I am not the only one in championing the cause of the forbidden fruit of a job at state level. We need to vigilant in this case of extreme injustice that is prevailing in the land of the telugus and make a forceful attempt to exact justice from the claws of the moneyed class and the vested interests who are prolonging the case to make money. Do we not have the requisite strength of intellectual capital to make a just stand in our case? Have we become a band of desperate degenerates who no longer have the capacity to fire their inner cylinders and have become a shadow of their former former selfs.
Secret deals have been arranged.
Friends any one..give info..they told. That in third week case will be disposed.. But still date of hearing is not given..if any one knows info Plz.. Comment..
Dear fellow Telugus and Countrymen,
It looks like end of the road for interview cands. Prepare and brace yourself for re-mains. Let Justice and reighteousness be the guide for your quest for eternal success.
Government has asked authorities to postpone the hearing of the case till clarity is achieved.
GOVERNMENTS , EITHER TELANGANA OR ANDHRA PRADESH DO NOT HAVE ANY AUTHORITY TO INTERVENE IN JUDICIAL PROCESS . WE ALL KNOW THAT. THE ISSUE IS BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONAL BODY AND JUDICIARY
GOVERNMENTS , EITHER TELANGANA OR ANDHRA PRADESH DO NOT HAVE ANY AUTHORITY TO INTERVENE IN JUDICIAL PROCESS . WE ALL KNOW THAT. THE ISSUE IS BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONAL BODY AND JUDICIARY
How to check when the APPSC review petition is coming for hearing? where do we get this information?
Vijay bhaskar..
Plz go to supreme Court website.. Case status..case no 777..review petition civil..year 2014
U ll get info
Judges are asking for compromize.
telengana govt not interested in interview cands. formation of new psc announced.
Interest of Telangana or AP Govt wont Matter here . Judiciary will decide and Public Service Commission has to Implement
Infact Respective Governments Needs More Recruitment after Biurcation
Sincere Candidates never loose an Opportunity . Declare of Interviewed Results or Remains as per Supreme Court is the Need of Hour
@NAMRATA SPOT Garu
209 NEWLY ADDED CANDIDATES CANNOT COMPROMISE WITH APPSC , AS THEY FILED THE CASE AGAINST APPSC
209 NEWLY ADDED CANDIDATES CANNOT COMPROMISE WITH INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES AS THEY WANT TO WRITE REMAINS
DO YOU MEAN APPSC WANT TO COMPROMISE WITH INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES INDICATING APPSC INABILITY FOR NOT DOING JUSTICE TO INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES
PLS CLARIFY NAMRATA GARU
likit sir, compromize means half posts for interview ppl and half for newly added ppl. so everone will be happy. judges are also suggesting this compromize. give and take policy.
@ NAMRATA GARU
IF WE GO THROUGH JANUARY 20,2014 JUDGEMENT OF SUPREME COURT .THEY REJECTED SALVE LAWYER ARGUMENT OF CONDUCTING REMAINS TO 209 CANDIDATES ON THE FOLLOWING REASON
209 candidates will answer one set of question papers
whereas those who had passed the main examination on the earlier occasion, had answered another set of question papers. This will not withstand scrutiny of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, since two sets of candidates will be tested on the basis of two different sets of examination papers. It is ultimately their ranking in the main examination which is going to be relevant. Therefore, the main examination has to be a common examination for all those who are now held to be eligible on the basis of their passing the preliminary examination.
REASON 2 : ASSUME OUT OF 209 CANDIDATES 30% QUALIFIED IN REMAINS .SO 62 CANDIDATES ARE ELIGIBLE FOR INTERVIEW . IF HALF OF THEM FIND PLACE IN MERIT LIST IE 31 CANDIDATES . HOW CAN HALF OF THE POSTS ie 150 plus will be filled with 31 candidates
DIVIDING HALF OF THE POST IS IMPOSSIBLE .
AS REVIEW PETITION 777 ,2014 HAVE NOT COME UP TO THE BENCH . HOW CAN JUDGES ADVISE FOR COMPROMISE ?
IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL . IT NEVER HAPPENS
greeat victory coming our way interview members.
@likit sir, unconstitutional is what is happening to groups bakra aspirants.What will never happen is this issue getting solved. this case will go for another couple of years and then who knows!
@NAMRATA GARU , THAT IS THE WORRY WE ALL UNDERGOING , MANY EMOTIONAL LIMITATIONS IN OUR LIVES WILL OCCUR , IF THE CASE GET FURTHER DELAY
ALL THE INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES MUST REPRESENT APPSC CHAIRMAN IMMEDIATELY SEEKING CLARIFICATION THE MOTO OF REVIEW PETITION ,777,2014 . IF APPSC GIVES CLARIFICATION THAT THEY ARE WINNING THE CASE BY PROVING 6 QUESTIONS CORRECT .THEN OUR PROBLEM GET SOLVED
ALREADY 2 YEARS VALUABLE TIME , HOPE ALL REMEMBER 2012 SEPTEMBER WHEN WE WROTE MAINS EXAM . EVEN IT POSTPONED THE MAINS EXAM AFTER GETTING BLOW FROM TRIBUNAL AND 1000+ NEW CANDIDATES WROTE EXAM ALONG WITH US
THE PROBLEM WOULD HAVE END UP IN 2012 . AWAKE INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES IT IS THE "CALCULATED /INTENTIONAL DELAY" BY APPSC
SUPREME COURT IS VERY CLEAR
IF APPSC WONT GIVE PROPER CLARIFICATION . FILING THE WRIT PETITION BY INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES BYPASSING APPSC IF ANOTHER BEST OPTION
What sort of financial implications are we looking at to file a writ petition, without institutional support of appsc?
@likit, I dont think appsc is delaying? What can it possibly achieve by delaying? We should trust appsc.
interviwers, ready for jobs?
ramji, do not make fun. be serious
any news from any corner, someone said that the case will be disposed in 3rd week, and it is ending and still no sight of any listing. Some conspiracy that is boiling in some mindsets. some thing is happening behind the scenes.
Keeping the review petition and the inordinate delay aside for a moment, wanted to understand what most of you guys have been doing? Is anyone working or looking out for jobs or studying, etc?
The bounty of nature has given has a merciful harvest and it is time to make good the bonanza of eating till you are accused of gluttony while poor people have nothing to eat.In these hard times, I am eating rice and avakay to run my sustenance body.
As per day in case from 2 + years. The interview candidates are in total loss.. Bcoz still now not lookin for another job.. Created lack of experience.and hence unemployment.. Plz request to all..if ur still depending on this.. Leave it aside and plan ur future..
And people who are working are lucky fellows..they can continue their own jobs..as they are in a safer zone..
I hope everbody else is eating biryani everyday from bavarchi.
@BHASINI GARU , DONT WORRY
WE GOT ONLY TWO OPTIONS
1.DECLARING FINAL LIST
2.REMAINS
AS THE ISSUE IS IN SUPREME COURT , WE HAVE TO ABIDE BY IT
likit, didi u have biryavi?
Likitha garu.. As this is service and recruitment matter supreme should be alert and dispose the case immediately bcoz this is matter of future of candidates..
As in the blog the lawyers are not at all interested in moving the case forward..
case judgment has been decided.in judge chambers.listen to channels
Namrata garu if ur,posting info Plz post complete information if it's correct..
IS it the supposedly result gonna change of perception about the balance of justice in Indian society? Have we in a way so used to to ineptitude that we make that a standard yardstick. While others have been perpetuating class differences to maintain the frailty of humans in this over populated country and where inequities bound to thrive, the common humanity itself shrieks in pain and anger in our society. Relegating ourselves , allowing ourselves to be hijacked by certain narrow elements which promote ignorance and mass hysteria so as to keep under control. The caste system has been a bane in our country.
Search for patterns and you will be rewarded with something which no body ever dared to possess. You are the inhibitor of your grandeur. Make a vow that singing in the rain will make u prevail in this world.
You are your worst competitor.
Whispers of Judges , Lobbying of Judges wont matter here.
Friends , Let us analyse in a Rational Manner Respecting Newly Added 209 Candidates , MAINS FAILED CANDIDATES, Interviewed Candidates
WHAT IS THE POSITION OF NEWLY ADDED 209 CANDIDATES NOW ?
They Filed the Petition against APPSC and Won 4 Times in tribunal, High court & twice in Supreme Court
Favouring 209 students SC ordered REMAINS and Disposed the Case on January 20, 2014 , Allowing APPSC to Convey their Stand if Any .
Waiting for 1 Month ie february , in the Form of Dairy case (Filing through Online ) APPSC filed the Case , Later the Dairy case was converted into Review Petition 777-778.
Another writ petition came to Judgement on April 4 , 2014 .
The Supreme Court advised Writ Petitioner that they will look into the Issue along with Review Petiton 777-778
SUPREME COURT ALREADY REJECTED THE FOLLOWING ARGUMENTS
Conducting Exams to only 209
State Bifurcation Issue
Interviewed Students Cannot Prepare Once again
SO , SC has to do Justice to 209 Candidates
DANGER AWAITS ?
EVEN MAINS FAILED CANDIDATES WILL APPROACH SUPREME COURT , IF THERE IS NO REMAINS and Interviewed Results will Declare Immediately
WHY ?
IF APPSC FAIL IN PROVING AUTHENTICITY OF 6 QUESTIONS , THEN MAINS FAILED CANDIDATES HAVE GOT THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT ie ARTICLE 14 , as they fall in the ambit of 144 Correct Answers and got the Eligibility for REMAINS
APPSC Had Given Chance to Failed Mains Candidates to Write REMAINS
WHAT ABOUT INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES ?
THEY are the Ultimate Loosers . If They Say Injustice Occurred For Them , Then 209 Candidates Say , Same Thing Happened to Us .
THE ONLY SOURCE OF PROBLEM Is APPSC
TO DO JUSTICE FOR EVERY ONE , SC Opted REMAINS as per ARTICLE 14
Along with APPSC Nasty Mistakes ,DELAY in Disposing The Case is also an Injustice Now . Most of the Interviewed Candidates Psychologically prepared for Remains
Fortunately If SUPREME COURT Gives Judgement Favouring Interviewed Candidates , MESSY SITUATION PREVAILS , IMMEDIATELY 209 NEWLY CANDIDATES AND MAINS FAILED CANDIDATES ( AS PER ARTICLE 14 ) WILL APPROACH HIGHER BENCHES SEEKING JUSTICE .
IT WILL ADD FEW MORE MESSY YEARS
APPSC IS IN THE PROCESS OF RECTIFYING ITS MISTAKES IN FUTURE EXAMS BY PREPARING AUTHENTIC QUESTION BANK ( AS PER EENADU PRATIBHA NET)
Plea to APPSC, Please release interview results. I am also making a humble request to those who have petitioned the SC, to withdraw and let the results be declared. There is merit in your case but as of now, how the situation stands, there is no recourse for further exams and re-mains. Let it end now.
confidential info for my sources.results abt to be declared.
flash news is coming from ashok nagar.
what is the flash news could u plz update
Even Prelims Failed Candidate & Prelim Passed but Not Written Mains Exam Candidate Creat Flash News that NOTIFICATION WILL GET CANCELLED
MAINS FAILED Candidates Creat FLASH NEWS that SC Ordered For REMAINS
INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES creat FLASH NEWS that SC Declared Results
LET FLASH NEWS COMES FROM SUPREME COURT
Overheard at Chai dukaan in library in ashok nagar. Notification is getting cancelled. something about recusing of judiciary. anybody knows what is meant by that?
@VAGDHATI GARU
Judicial recusal Means a judge may recuse himself from proceedings if he decides that it is not appropriate for him to hear a case listed to be heard by him. A judge may recuse himself when a party applies to him to do so. A judge must step down in circumstances where there appears to be bias or ‘apparent bias’.
For Example , Justice R.V. Raveendran Step Down hearing the Reliance company cases at the very outset disclosed that he held shares in Those companies.
So if a Judge Had any Special Interest in Certain Cases , he will step Down
OUR’S is an Issue Between Constitutional Body (APPSC) and The Group 1 Aspirants (Especially on Article 14 ).
Honarable 2 Bench Judiciary Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar & Chelameshwar who gave Judgement on January 20, 2014 on Civil Appeal No 9140 & 9141 , 2013 already DISPOSED the Case ORDERING REMAINS , and giving Flexibility to APPSC for Further Consideration if Any
SO TWO JUDGES DO NOT HAVE ANY SHARES IN APPSC , NOR DO THEY WORKED WITH APPSC , Nor Do they Have any Personnel Interest in APPSC to Step Down
SO , NOTIFICATION WON’T GET CANCELLED . DON’T WORRY
IF LAWYERS ON BEHALF OF 209 CANDIDATES WITHDRAW THE CASE , IMMEDIATELY FINAL RESULTS WILL BE PUBLISHED
IF APPSC WITH DRAW THE Review Petition 777, 2014 or Supreme Court Dispose the Case in favour of 209 APPSC will Conduct REMAINS on SUPREME COURT ORDERS .
BASED ON SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT ONLY THERE WILL BE FURTHER COURSE OF ACTION
@likitcool garu, thanks for explaining. my doubt is this.If SC orders re-mains, and 209 candidates get in to write re-mains, then will any of the mains written candidates get excluded from the new list?
Or Will the re-mains exam be conducted for all previous mains written+209?
@VAGDHATI GARU
IF YOU GO THROUGH CIVIL APPEAL CASE NO 9140 & 9141 , 2013
SUPREME COURT ORDERED TO CONDUCT REMAINS JOINTLY FOR
209 CANDIDATES + MAINS FAILED CANDIDATES + INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES
SO WE ARE WRITING MAINS , ALONG WITH FAILED MAINS CANDIDATES AND 209 CANDIDATES
SO THERE IS NO QUESTION OF EXCLUSION . ALL THOSE WHO WROTE MAINS WILL WRITE MAINS ONCE AGAIN
A new alternative is proposed by APPSC in case SC again orders remains (which is highly impossible) that remains will be conducted for only interviewed candidates and 209 candidates (total 606 + 209 only). Mains failed candidates already failed to clear the mains so they should not get another chance to write mains as there is no issue with the mains exam. Interviewed candidates are ready for this in case of worst scenario.
@likitcool garu, Here is the last but one paragraph of the judgment.
"Having heard learned counsel for the parties,we are of the view that these questions cannot be retained.That being so,the marks secured have to be recounted from the answer books written by all the candidates on the basis of the 144 questions after deleting these six questions and answers. Those who succeed afte revaluation will be eligible for the main exam and the APPSC will hold the main exam de novo thereafter.On the basis of these 144 questions some new candidates may succeed or some candidates may fail. It will be the new list of candidates passing the examination of 144 marks who will take the second main examination."
Are you talking about this judgment only? If yes, then there appears to be some divergence from your opinion. Please clarify.
@VAGDHATI GARU , YOU ARE REFERRING HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT
PLEASE REFER SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT , GIVEN ON JAN 20 , 2014 . WHICH IS THE LATEST JUDGEMENT AND FINAL JUDGEMENT AND THEY DISPOSED THE CASE
GO TO SUPREME WEB SITE
STEP 1 : CLICK ON CASE NUMBER
STEP 2 : CASE TYPE : CIVIL APPEAL
CASE NO : 9140
YEAR 2013
SUBMIT
THEN CLICK ON LATEST ORDER
ALL THOSE WHO WROTE MAINS ARE ELIGIBLE FOR REMAINS
This is a close and shut case. The SC judges have complete clarity. Why APPSC is not having? There is not much APPSC can do from here. Only a miracle will lead to declaration of results. And I do believe in miracles. But this seems to be a very closed case by now. However APPSC can prolong this case if it wishes, for the remainder of our natural lives. Now or even twenty years later, it has to conduct re-mains for case number 9140/2013.Pack up
Do Remains will be Conducted For 209 Candidates & Interviewed Candidates ?
ANS : NO
WHY?
Clearly The Supreme court in its Judgement ,January 2014 mentioned the Reason as Follows :
209 candidates will answer one set of question papers
whereas those who had passed the main examination on the earlier occasion, had answered another set of question papers. This will not withstand scrutiny of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, since two sets of candidates will be tested on the basis of two different sets of examination papers. It is ultimately their ranking in the main examination which is going to be relevant. Therefore, the main examination has to be a common examination for all those who are now held to be eligible on the basis of their passing the preliminary examination.
Will the judgment of the review petition the last? Or will it be postponed to be listed later?
@vamsikrishna. If re-mains for interview ppl and 209 candidates is possible then pray tell me, How can you say that re-mains to all is impossible.? You are projecting your opinion without base.
@vamsikrishna, How do you know the new proposal of appsc. Has anybody talked to appsc chairman. If you have news then tell details and source of news also. Do not indulge in using ur imagination. Lives are at stake here.
frends, appsc and interview candidates lawyers have given new arguments.this is the latest talk.
1. mains only for 606+209.
2. since many of the 209 will not attend the mains exam, only 30-40 students of the 209 are expected to write the exam, so a proposal to directly call 209 students for interview along with 606. So appsc is trying for RE-INTERVIEWS.
sO THERE IS NO RE-MAINS. AFTER REVIEW PETITION, A NEW AMICUS CURATIVE PETITION WILL BE FILED.
@ NAMRATA GARU
ISSUE 1
Conducting MAINS Exam only to 209 candidates was ALREADY DISPOSED BY SUPREME COURT .SO THERE IS NO CHANCE FOR APPSC TO PREDICT ONLY 30-40 STUDENTS WILL APPEAR FOR MAINS . IT IS NOT THE POINT TO CONDUCT EXAM FOR 209 CANDIDATES . APPSC LAWYERS ARGUED WHY TO INCLUDE MAINS FAILED CANDIDATES ALSO AND SC GAVE EXPLANATION FOR IT .PLS CHECK SC WEBSITE FOR DETAILS .SO ONCE AGAIN APPSC LAWYERS WONT RAISE THIS ISSUE
ISSUE 2
CONDUCTING REMAINS FOR 209 + 606 CANDIDATES WAS ALREADY DISPOSED , PLS CHECK THE REASONS GIVEN BY SUPREME COURT ON CIVIL APPEAL ,9140 & 9141,2013 .APPSC WONT APPROACH WITH THIS BASELESS ARGUMENT
ISSUE 3
DIRECTLY CALLING 209 CANDIDATES ALONG WITH 606 ALREADY INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES FOR RE INTERVIEW WAS NEVER HAPPENED , IT WONT HAPPEN . SUPREME COURT WILL SCOLD APPSC .
WITH OUT WRITING MAINS EXAMS HOW CAN APPSC JUSTIFY THE CALIBRE OF 209 CANDIDATES . WE HAVE TO REMEMBER APPSC THAT GROUP 1 EXAM WILL BE OF 3 STAGES , PRELIM , MAINS , INTERVIEW . NOT DIRECTLY CONDUCTING INTERVIEW FOR PRELIM CANDIDATES
ISSUE 4
DISPOSAL OF CASE
BY SEPTEMBER 2014 , WE ARE GOING TO COMPLETE 2 YEARS OF PAINFUL AGONY .
REMEMBER APPSC NEVER HELPED INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES .
IT IS FIGHTING IN SUPREME COURT ONLY TO PROTECT IT LOOPHOLES WHICH WAS ALREADY EXPOSED BY SUPREME COURT
ISSUE 5
COURSE OF ACTION
THE ISSUE IS BETWEEN 1.209 CANDIDATES 2.SUPREME COURT 3.APPSC
209 CANDIDATES ARE CLEAR
SUPREME COURT IS CLEAR
ONLY APPSC HAS TO BE CLARIFIED
ON APPELANT SIDE (APPSC) THERE ARE 6 LAWYERS
ON RESPONDENT SIDE (209 ASPIRANTS) THERE ARE 13 LAWYERS . DEFINETLY 13 LAWYERS WILL ACCEPT THE ARGUMENT IF THERE IS ANY CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF APPSC ARGUMENT OTHER WISE APPSC HAS TO FAIL 5TH TIME
FRIENDS KEENLY READ THE FOLLOWING APPSC ARGUMENTS
1.APPSC REQUESTING SC TO ALLOW TO CONDUCT EXAM ONLY 209 CANDIDATES
2. APPSC REQUESTING SC TO ALLOW TO CONDUCT EXAM ONLY 209 CANDIDATES& 606 CANDIDATES
3.APPSC DIRECTLY CALLING 209 FOR INTERVIEWS AS PER NAMRATA GARU NEWS
WHERE WE ARE GOING ? DO THEY HAPPEN
APPSC HAS TO LEARN A LOT FROM UPSC , JUST FOR REPLACMENT OF QUESTION PAPER , IT CANCELLED EXAM THROUGH OUT INDIA ONCE
IF APPSC FILES AMICUS CURATIVE ALSO , NOTHINBG WILL HAPPEN , BUT DELAY
CASE DISPOSAL IS THE NEED OF THE HOUR
Interview Candidates,Tell you opinion .
DO YOU THINK THAT THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE HAVE BEEN VIOLATED IN THE ONGOING CASE BY WITHHOLDING THE RESULTS AND ORDERING THE MAINS EXAM AGAIN? GIVE REASONS SUPPORTING YOUR VIEWS.
Your opinion is very important in the future course of this case.
The serious interview candidates want re-mains.
Conduct the mains exam once again. We are with you appsc. Majority of interview candidates will be selected in re-mains also. Then why are your fearing failure ,my dear interview candidates. Ask APPSc to withdraw and conduct re-mains again.
revieew patition final listing and judment listing ayyindi ani anipistundi.
Hello and namasthe..
case vishyamu emi avtundho, plz evaraina cheppandi..eppudu results vastayo cheppagalara...chala finiancial problems lo unnanu. review petition ayina tarvata emi avutadi.
results declared.
Dear Rajashekar,why are you giving the message that results declared. Dont give fake messages.
Namratha ji interview candidates are not ready to write mains again.We have confidence but we dont want to waste our time again.
About non interview candidates if they have confidence on them they could have kept quite.By this time this group1 result would have declared and the new notification also they would have released.
First learn the sportive spirit my dear non qualified candidates.U didnt qualify then u have to makeup your mind for next notification or for other jobs.Because of you, all interviewed candidates are suffering since 2 years.
Why are you wasting your time and others.What u so called justice is this matter.You are telling that APPSC has done injustice to you,What you are all doing,You also doing injustice to the interviewed candidates.Please question yourself is it fair??????
When is the hearing of the case
@VIJAY GARU
Immediately after Interviews If APPSC Had Published Merit List, then We HAVE WON THE CASE
BECAUSE , SUPREME COURT HAD PROTECTED THE INTERESTS OF SELECTED CANDIDATES , EVEN THOUGH MISTAKES OCCURRED IN MAINS EXAM
PLS GO THROUGH THE FOLLOWING CASE
CASE 1:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5318-5319 OF 2013
(@ S.L.P.(C) Nos.26341-26342 of 2011)
Vikas Pratap Singh and Ors. Appellants
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. Respondents
Judgement :
In our considered view, the appellants have successfully undergone training and are efficiently serving the respondent-State for
more than three years and undoubtedly their termination would not only impinge upon the economic security of the appellants and their
dependants but also adversely affect their careers. This would be highly unjust and grossly unfair to the appellants who are
innocent appointees of an erroneous evaluation of the answer scripts. However, their continuation in service should neither give any
unfair advantage to the appellants nor cause undue prejudice to the candidates selected qua the revised merit list.
CASE 2 :
AS FINAL LIST /MERIT LIST /SELECTION LIST WAS NOT PUBLISHED SUPREME COURT ORDERED TO DRAW A FRESH MERIT LIST LIKE OUR CASE .
PLS GO THROUGH THE CASE
CASE 2 :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2525-2516 OF 2013
(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.5752-53 of 2008
JUDGEMENT :
answer scripts of candidates appearing in 'A' series of
competition examination held pursuant to advertisement No.
1406 of 2006 shall be got re-evaluated on the basis of a
correct key prepared on the basis of the report of Dr.
(Prof.) CN Sinha and Prof. KSP Singh and the observations
made in the body of this order and a fresh merit list
drawn up on that basis.(BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION)
TWO FAULTS DONE BY APPSC
FAULT 1 : NOT PUBLISHING THE MERIT LIST IMMEDIATELY AFTER INTERVIEWS
FAULT 2 : ASKING SC TO CONDUCT EXAM FOR 209 CANDIDATES
@vijay garu, What "time waste" are u talking about? Already 2 years gone by. So you are saying that another 3-4 months tops for re-mains and interviews will constitute a "time-waste" for you. Very Surprizing. For a moment keep aside 209 candidates? And do some introspection according to the prevailing circumstance. Here the argument is not about interview candidate vs 209 and other interested parties. The moot point here is the observations and inclination of SC. Do you really think SC will reverse its stand at this juncture after 4 observations. Do you really think 209 candidates will withdraw the case after this time and effort on their part? And if you think APPSC will protect ur interests even from here, then majority of interviewed candidates will beg to disagree with you. And I hope you are not thinking that APPSC will file a curative petition if review petition is disposed by ordering re-mains.Just as I said earlier, a curative petition will only be admitted only if there is a perceived gross miscarriage of justice and violation of principles. I will leave that judgment to all the interview candidates on that issue. It is not only how we feel but we should be able to convince SC judges of the same. Secondly, If the curative petition is dismissed, then there is chance that exemplary costs be imposed on the petitioner by appsc. Anyway my argument is that curative petition is not a magic wand for interview candidates as many of us are led to believe.
@likitcool garu, please give your opinion about curative petition and its possible ramifications in our case.
@likit cool garu,You are correct,APPSC could have published marks after interviews like last notification.That is a big blunder done by APPSC.
When is the hearing????????????????
@VAGDHATI GARU
THOUGHT OF CURATIVE PETITION BY APPSC ITSELF REVEALS THAT APPSC KNOW IN ADVANCE THAT IT IS GOING TO BE DEFEATED IN REVIEW PETITON 777, 2014 .
APPSC IS FEELING THAT perceived gross miscarriage of justice and violation of principles OCCURED TO THEM AND NOT TO INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES
JUST TO DELAY THE PROCESS , IT IS A WEAPON FOR APPSC
APPSC HAS TO SCRUTINISE THE PREVIOUS VERDICTS OF SUPREME COURT ON COMPETITVE EXAMS ISSUES
SC has to follow the tradition of Stare Decisis. As said by likitcool garu, there are precedents to follow.
@likitcool garu,
1)It was my opinion that appsc may go for a curative petition, but we have not officially heard from appsc that it might file such a petition in this case.
2) What will APPSC get if its real intention is to delay the case. It is not as of a sudden metamrphosis of existing facts of the case will take place?
And somebody was talking about interview candidates filing a separate petition in SC in this case. That will not be allowed as the interview candidates interest are being argued by a separate lawyer other than appsc. Now I guess after review petition judgment , the case will be disposed.
interview cands remains ki oppukom...unko ten years ayina coirt lo fight chestham, sc tarvata malli high court lo case vestam.maku anyayam jarigindi.already kontha mandi ki financial problems ani antunnaru. @prerana, mana kadupu kotti ee coaching centers andharu chesina darunamaina mosaniki manam andharu ante interview cands enduku bali avvali. memu malli mains rayamu.evvarni rayinchamu kuda. telngana govt ki ee vishayam lo memu kalaga chesukoni nyayam cheyalani adugutam. asalu 209 cand telengana biddalu ku anyayam chest unnaru. 209 cands lo evaru telengana ku chendina vallu leru?ante dani ardham emiti. sc judges seemandhra vepu emaina partiality chupistunnara? re-mains undakudadu. undanivvam. memu unko padi savatsralu poradi ma nijayiti ni chatukuntam.
ramji anna, nenu telengana bidda ni.
groups lo andhariki santham mukka gadinga rahambala hot lo cham.
caselisted
case disposed
i still see the case status PENDING
offline sources are active at SC gates.now why the case was disposed without taking decision is the main cause of worry.
ramji, u are wrong. dont fight.
intervew cands andharu ekamu avvandi. case kottvetha meeda mana aagraham telapadaniki, manam evvari maddathu teesukovali, nenu oka political leader tho mataladina, gani political sayam manaki dhakketattu ledu. ee simha swapnam ela sadinchali. prerana chelli, manam emi cheddam.mana intervew kastam endho ganga lo neelu papalu ayyindi.. deeniki karanalu mana meeda unna eersha tho coaching centers chesina kutila yatnam idhi. ashok nagar lo seats gurinchi kottu kuntunnaru ani na source dwara telisindi..ee bayankara sannaham deni gurinchi.
hello, interbview valla nadharu fast unto death cheddam. appudu results declare chestharu. Kadili randi. Basheer bagh press club lo wait chestunna tomorrow 6 pm.
case poraadadaniki chanda collect cheyalli.
Any updates.
Pure innocence has been subdued and a ravaging mindset has been agglomerated as with reality bites. Who is the culprit in this unholy mess. Are we to assume that we have a addiction for success.? What is addiction to have a great mind with fewer opportunities?
girls dont read this message:
GD dobbudu. nasta pekk pykuddbu
Even I have heard from a coaching institute in Ashok nagar that the case has been quashed. But do not know how true it is...
Need to see what happens next - Don't know what options APPSC has in front of it.
If remains is imperative, then who would conduct it - APPSC or UPSC or TSPSC?
Will APPSC finally bend the knee?
interviwe chala nikkama gadlu laga unnaru. basheerbag press club loki evvaru enduku raledho cheppandi..manam emi cheyyalo eppudu cheyyalo evarriki telusthadi..chandalu esi esi malli court lo veyyalui..
kudu lekunda unna valam ma kadupu kottina 209 mosam chesaru. kastapadi interview chesina vallam memu malli select avtham ani gurarantee emi undhi.siggu lekunda odipoyam, ee samajam mamalni kullu tho tatsaram chedina ee kutila rajekiyalu ni dveshitunna.
review petition has been ratified.
Raja sekhar, Can you please elaborate and be much simpler?
Bits and pieces of info here and there. Intel suggests, the word ratification can be construed as approval of an act. In the given case whether the approval of the position of appsc remains to be seen.
Notifications in Telengana are due anytime now. With the case still languishing in SC, Will G-1 notification in Telengana be released with the formation of TPSC?
mana andharni mosam chesaru. Tg govt tpsc meeda guri pedtundi gani ma peda jeevithallo lo nyayam thevatledu. Idhi chala kandaniyam. mamalni andharu darunanga mosam chesaru. andhari sakshi ga ippudu interview cands re-mains ki prepare avvala ledho kuda ardham kavatledu. Idhi evvaru chesaru?Evvaru cheyyincharu? Inka entha sepu ee anthara madanam.,..andharu sampooo sanka nakadaniki saripoyaru gani ee case gelavdam kuda avvaledu.
Flash news : The word ratification can also mean referring to the confirmation of earlier decision.
na pelli agipoyandi. nannu inka evaru chesukuntaru?
prerana chelli, ikkada chala kulankarshamina vastuvulu chala sandhistunnam, nee pelli antha pramukyam santharinchukodu. intyerview cands ki assalu emi levu laga unnayi..evvaru poradatledu
news bogies are coming in hot. Prepare for deluge of news related to the repugnant case.
Do you believe in supression of anarchy?
Navin Kiran, What does the coaching center say? We have been starved of news. Sources are intentionally keeping it a secret.
has notification been cancelled? How can they cancel it? What are our options now? Will they increase the posts and give a fresh notification. I think this means we cannot believe in past precedents.
Anyone tell the news, I am also hearing that cancellation has taken place.
@VAGDHATI GARU
DONT WORRY , NOTIFICATION WONT GET CANCELLED AS PER SUPREME COURT JANUARY 20, 2014 ORDER .
still review petition 777, 2014 is Pending .
APPSC will conduct re-mains as the mains exam was conducted before bifurcation.
@VAGDHATI GARU
BIFURCATION IS NOT AT ALL AN ISSUE
AS PER ARTICLE 371D , OUR ZONES WILL BE DETERMINED
case decided.
GOOD NEWS
FINALLY CASE WAS LISTED
NEXT DATE OF LISTING IS 6/8/2014
AUGUST 6 ,2014 WEDNESDAY
PLS CHECK ,SUPREME COURT WEBSITE
REVIEW PETITION 777,2014
ALL THE BEST
Will a final result come on that day?
aithe manam ippudu sc ki vellala? mana mundu unna daari edhi?
If SC orders re-mains then, will it stand the scrutiny of PMO?
@rajasekhar.. how is pmo related to this issue?? u act as an intellectual by posting some nonsense like ratification n stuff.. u r a loser bro n will always be one.. stop creating nuisance on forum.;.
duh..what is meant by the word "intellectual" you anonymous piece of shet! Oh by the way did you see me snug in your bed to see your " loser action" Totally Uncool Braw.
case is on 6th august 2014
@anonnymous and friends, will a final result come on august 6th?
@namrata garu, Nobody knows what will happen that day. As you can see, people are quarelling for that information only. All the best.
AS IT IS NOT OUR PERSONNEL LIFE : FAITH , TRUST , MIRACLES WONT HAPPEN
THE JUDGEMENT COMES AS PER CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY
EVEN JUDGES HAS TO ABIDE BY CONSTITUTION
I'm not being dramatic... But only God can bring us out from this situation...
ALL THE BEST TO INTERVIEW CANDIDATES
@Bhashini, God is Personal. This is public. God is not only for you. God is for everybody. Dont be emotional.
Time has come to argue over the scenario of re-mains.
What sort of operational difficulties, APPSC might face in conducting the exam.?
How will APPSC guarantee that, no further litigation is involved in this case.
Will this show ends on 6th aug 2014?
Some Interviewed candidates get up from sleeping atleast talk about the case to the judicial procedure
.....to know the judicial procedure
likitcool garu is a walking dictionary in judicial procedures.
6th august 2014 oka black day ma interview candidates ki
Who are we but mere mortals to expect a conclusion to this gut wrenching saga. A victor and the vanquished will walk on the high cliff and only one will fall in the deep seas.
the spirits have spoken and the denial has been petrified.
kukkala kanna kidu dorukutadi gani maku nyayam dorakadu. apple pandu thinadaniki makke hakku ledha, lekapaothe svecha ledha? ee ranga rinchina rangula ratnam pai inka enni rathrulu savari cheyyali?
This is a message to all interviewed candidates. We along with certain interview candidates have approached a famous lawyer and asked for the opinion in our case. The lawyer has indicated a way for us incase,the review petition is rejected. We have file a petition to include interview candidates as a new party to argue the case afresh. APPSC will also extend cooperation in the same. As such there is a way out for interview candidates even if the judgment is for re-mains. Friends we have to organize a meet to take a decision collectively. All interview people, mail to me at this address, charan.alwayswins@gmail.com
@ Charan Garu
Pls go Through Recent Supreme Court Judgement Like Ours
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5318-5319 OF 2013
(@ S.L.P.(C) Nos.26341-26342 of 2011)
Vikas Pratap Singh and Ors. Appellants
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. Respondents
IN THIS CASE AS SUCCESFUL CANDIDATES UNDERWENT EVEN TRAINING PROGRAMME AFTER PASSING INTERVIEW STAGE , THOUGH FAULTS OCCURED IN MAINS QUESTIONS , SC PROTECTED THEM , AS APPSC DECLARED FINAL LIST AND APPOINTMENTS MEANS WE WILL ALSO COME UNDER THIS CATEGORY
CASE 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2525-2516 OF 2013
(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.5752-53 of 2008
REMAINS ORDERED LIKE OUR CASE
likitcool garu, IN cASE 2, Has the re-mains been conducted by that PSC according to the SC judgment? That is the critical point.
CAse 2 also seems to differ from our case. There is no mains written exam in that case. Only a single exam
And also in case 1, the honourable Court while protecting the interests of the appointed and trained candisdates has made a provision for placing the aggreived candidates at the bottom of the list and gave orders for their appointment giving due age relaxation.
In my opinion, I dont think that either of the cases will have a bearing in our case as the circumstances and conditions differ.
@ CHARAN GARU
MOST OF US ARE NOT GETTING THE Correct Point
ISSUE 1 :
THE PROBLEM IS NOT WITH INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES NOR DECLARING THE RESULTS TO US
ISSUE 2 :
THE PROBLEM IS NOT WITH MAINS FAILED CANDIDATES NOR WITH MAINS EXAM
ISSUE 3 :
THE PROBLEM IS WITH PRELIM EXAM AND 6 WRONG QUESTIONS OF APPSC , WHERE 209 AGGRIEVED CANDIDATES MISSED MAINS EXAM
CASE 2 : BIHAR SERVICE COMMISSION IS EXACTLY LIKE US ie PREPARING FRESH LIST AFTER DELETING WRONG ANSWERS .The Only Diference is Bihar Exam is Single Exam , Our's Contain Mains & Interview .
ALL the Arguments in SC Revolved around Prelim Pattern Only
THE CORE POINT IS 6 WRONG QUESTIONS
frends, Let all intervew candytes boycot re-mains. Then appsc will not go forward.
entha mandhi na tho unnaro, ikkada comment cheyyandi.
Atleast contact commission pro cell about our case
ippude mataladina appsc officer tho, emi cheyyali ani adigithe, chattam thana pani chesukuntadi ani badulu icchindu.denikaina siddanga undi ani selavu palikadu.
ramji anna, boycot chesthe neeke nastam. ala cheyyaku.
If re-mains is ordered by the SC, what are the options in front of APPSC?
APPSC will argue on the followong points.
1. It cannot bear the huge cost of re-mains.
2. This will result in a continuous litigation.
How can ordering re-mains again result in continuous litigation?@rajasekhar. I am a interviewed candidate and I am not sure if i will be in the merit list if appsc releases the final list. As such there are 300 candidates like me who only have 50 percent probability to make the final cut. So If re-mains is to be conducted , then it is not the tragedy for interviewed candiates as many think. This is like a second chance. Litigation and further cases will also be not allowwed on this matter as any furtherance of petitions and writs will be of mischievous nature.
@RAJASEKHAR GARU , DONT WORRY
APPSC is a Constitutional Body and Not a Private Organisation to Bear or Not to Bear the Cost of Conducting Remains . As per Supreme Court Verdict every thing Follows.
APPSC HAS TO OBEY THE CONSTITUTION .
AS BOTH GOVERNMENTS , TELANGANA AND AP are Coming up WITH MASSIVE PLANS FOR NEW RECRUITMENTS , SUFFICIENT BUDGETS ARE ALLOTTED .
THIS CASE HAS TO COME TO AN END , SO THAT IT MAY NOT BE HINDARANCE FOR FURTHER GROUP 1 NOTIFICATIONS IN BOTH STATES
THE NEW COMMITTED CHIEF MINISTERS FROM BOTH SIDES WONT TOLERATE FURTHER DELAY , I STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT APPSC WONT CREATE ANY FURTHER DELAY
I sincerely hope that this case should end. There should be a fullstop to this either this way or that way. Indeed this has been such a mess up for appsc 2011 group 1 notification. If APPSC and SC still want to fiddle the harp, when the aspirants are burning, then there is no bigger a villian character than appsc.
Dear Interview candidates atleast now open your open your mouths.
What are the chances of a favourable verdict for interview candidates. Are there any new arguments in the review petition of appsc. Or is it the end of the road for interview candidates.?
I request all the 606 interview candidates to go to temple...masjid.....church and pray god sincerely for the judgement in our favour to release the results tomorrow. It works.
@SANDHYA PRIYA GARU
DO SUPREME COURT HAD CONCERN OVER INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES?
YES
They Know the Pain we Underwent reaching Upto Interview Stage
THERE ARE 4 OBSTACLES TO DO JUSTICE TO INTERVIEWED CANDIDATES
1ST OBSTACLE
Surprisingly APPSC itself , Because they Repeatedly Argued Conducting Mains Exam to 209 Candidates Only is a Strong Proof to Supreme Court that APPSC DONE MISTAKES IN 6 QUESTIONS and APPSC has to Reshuffle the List of 606 Candidates , Which is Never Possible .
2nd OBSTACLE
209 NEWLY ADDED CANDIDATES
The Lawyers on behalf of 209 Candidates Received judgement in Favour 4 Times tribunal, High Court , Sc(Oct ,2013) , January 20, 2014 .
Now if Suddenly SC Gives Verdict in Favour of APPSC , They will move to Higher Bench to ask APPSC to Prove Authenticity of 6 Questions
ONCE AGAIN DELAY , AS of Now 65,940 Cases are PENDING in SUPREME COURT ALONE , WE DON’T KNOW WHEN THE NEXT HEARING IF DELAY
3RD OBSTACLE
MAINS FAILED CANDIDATES
APPSC 6 WRONG QUESTIONS GAVE THEM STRENGTH TO FILE A CASE
There is a need to re-conduct exam to the Unqualified candidates in Mains exam (i.e, candidates not selected for Interview) - why because, They competed in the Mains selection with some of the candidates, who are not eligible to write Mains based on the wrong prelims key selection. In this process the rightful candidates defeated in the hands of ineligible candidates. So, the competition itself is wrong as it is with the wrong competitors.
So the current Unselected candidates for Interview also have the right to rewrite the Fresh Mains Exam to Compete with the correct eligible candidates (i.e, with the persons who are selected in the correct prelims key and his past exam mates. )
Based on this analysis it is clearly evident that The honorable SUPREME COURT decision to create a fresh list of Prelims qualified candidates based on the Correct key, after omissions and emissions of candidates and re-conduct fresh Mains exam to all eligible candidates.
This is only way justice can be done according to Article 16 - Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment. (No ineligible person can be selected for public employment)
SO MAINS FAILED CANDIDATES APPROACH SUPREME COURT SEEKING JUSTICE AS PER ARTICLE 16
4TH OBSTACLE
SURPRISNGLY PRELIMS CANDIDATES , YES , PRELIMS CANDIDATES
PRELIMS CANDIDATES CAN ALSO ENTER INTO THE SCENARIO
ACTUALLY HONARABLE HIGH COURT OF AP , ORDERED APPSC TO PREPARE FRESH LIST (144 CORRECT ANSWERS LIST )AFTER DELETING 6 QUESTIONS , AND TO CONDUCT REMAINS FOR ALL WHO FALLS UNDER THIS AMBIT .
IF APPSC Listened to High Court , Then We Doesn’t Know who actually Falls under 144 questions ambit ( even chance for Interviewed Candidates to be OUT as per HC
The Logic is if 209 Candidates WILL Enter Means 209 Candidates ( Out of Mains Failed + Mains Absentee +Interviewed Candidates 209 WILL BE KEPT AWAY )
IF PRELIMS CANDIDATES FILES A PETITION WHAT HAPPENS ?
BUT SUPREME COURT SIMPLIFIED THE PROCEDURE after 2 Years Ordering REMAINS TO 209 + MAINS Written But Failed + Interviewed Candidates Keeping AWAY SOME 7000 CANDIDATES WHO PASSED PRELIMS BUT NOT WRITTEN MAINS
THAT IS THE BEST OPTION SUPREME COURT HAD
WHO IS DELAYING THE PROCESS?
AFTER TOMMOROW IF 209 CANDIDATES OR MAINS FAILED CANDIDATES OR PRELIM Candidates Approaches SC the CASE will be settled soon in the coming Months
BUT IF APPSC Aproaches Once again , FURTHER DELAY TAKES PLACE BECAUSE THERE IS NO VALIDITY in APPSC arguments
Winner is always a Winner , we are Ready to Prove . But How tough to Wait Unnecessarily
FOR US NOW GOD is APPSC , WE HAVE TO PRAY APPSC NOT TO PROCEED FURTHER , BECAUSE IT CAN’T PROVE , BUT DELAY
BY SEPTEMBER 2014 , WE ARE COMPLETING 2 YEARS OF WRITING MAINS EXAM
God is for everyone. Not for individuals.
Thank you Likitcool garu for the detailed explanation.
Feeling very tensed.
I request all the 606 interview candidates to pray god sincerely for judgement in our favour to release the results tomorrow.thank u.
@sandhya priya garu, I doubt if i will be selected in the final list.
@likitcool garu,Can you please elaborate on this part which u said earlier.
"AFTER TOMMOROW IF 209 CANDIDATES OR MAINS FAILED CANDIDATES OR PRELIM Candidates Approaches SC the CASE will be settled soon in the coming Months "
Should 209+mains failed or prelims candidates file a fresh petition? In what circumstance(depending on the judgment)should they go to court again.
Tomorrow at 1.30 pm our case comes before bench I request all the interview candidates to pray the god they like.remind the bhakti movement during medieval history.by praying we can get the blessings of god.pray sincerely. Promise god about the thing you are going to do good for the society if judgement in our favour and if u are selected.
All 209 candidates pray to GOd for success in our case. We should win.
Since 2 years has gone, Justice should be done for everybody and not only interviewed. The remaining 209 have also waited and all mains candidates have waited. So natural justice demands conduct of exam again. All candidates pray to GOD for conduct of exam.
New evidence has come to light for appsc. Is this a deliberate ploy? Why that information was withheld from the respondents all this time?
Arguments have commenced half an hour back.
Is,it,a positive response or not...
Since arguments and hearing are taking a time, more than 2 hours, it seems that a favourable response for appsc as judges are taking long time to decide. otherwise it would have been decided in the beginning of hearing only. Any body has more news.
live proceedings channels lo started.
two lawywers came out of hall no-6
which channels?? who are the lawyers??
i am not watching channels. Got news about lawyers from SC premises.
hi guys, y r u in the business of propagating false new? who said that the arguments are being held in sc? If hv correct info., then only share with others. Otherwise, just keep on doing some other work...
@prerana..which channels??
case argud nd lested in sc today abd started at 1 clock.ok. anil see sc wubsite
@charan & prerna, R u der in SC? hw do u know the proceedings? Y r u giving such false info. to us. Review petition is served in the judge's chamber. If judge is satisfied that there is an error apparent on the face of record, then only, he'll decide whether to call for arguments or not. Further, the court will issue notices to both parties to come for the arguments. If he is not satisfied, then and there itself, he can dismiss the Review petitions.
xpres chennel , saying abt case.
hi prerna, I just wonder hw could you see the arguments on sc website. I am little surprised to know the arguments were held at 1pm, whereas the case is listed at 1.30pm. You only can clarify this... Just check my previous comment on the proceedings. hope, it will give some info.
@prerana, xpress News is an Urdu language Pakistani news channel based in Lahore, launched on January 1, 2008. It is owned and run by the country's third largest Urdu daily, Daily Express. Hw come a pakistani news channel can give our gr-1 news?
@anil i'm ROFl...for ur comment on prerana..
Even if the review petition is dismissed, there still a chance for appsc to file Curative petition...
@balu, what is ROFI? i didn't get u, bro...
@anil, it is surprising to note youe comment about false news. I merely stated my opinion on the case given the circunstances that 2 hoours have passes since communcement of arguments. One can use their imagination as to why that much delay is happening. Since both parties are arguing and hence it is clear that the review petition is not dismissed.
anil it is express news,no a paki chanel, it is telgu chanel
Curative petitions are not submitted for civil cases involving recruitment matters.There was never a precedent to my knowledge. It ends with review petition.
the case is being heard with arguments on both sides. more lawyers went inside.
@Prerana, thanx for the info. i hv never come across such a channel.
compromize being reached with so many parties at hand.
@rajasekhar, nice to hear da news from u. By da way, do u work in SC? If so, what is the logic behind the attendance of more no. of lawyers/ Could u plz explain/
ramji anna, entey aa compromize, manam gelichama?
kudos...guys, I don't know how to react at ur comments. Ironically, u r da so called group-1 aspirants who r eager to know the result of this case. Come on, grow up...
matters of recruitment have to be finally decided by curative petition as murder of justice has been done.
Hey ramji, compramise ekkadainaa court lo avuthundaa?
@sempli, murder of justice has not been done yet. It will happen after the final judgment.
ias aspirants are burning vehicle, all g-1 aspirants manam..we are peons to upsc aspirants.
@Prerana, Y do u ask such silly qs? SC judge both parties ni pilichi compramise kandi, nenu case kottivesthaanu ani antaadaa? Ikkada both parties ante advocatesaa leka appsc and respondentsaa?? Mari vaallu andaru court lo unnaaraa? Ramji, cheppandi...
anil, manam gelichamu. ippudu naku pelli abvuthadi. aithe appointements eppudu vasthayi. curative eyyala voddha inka appsc emi cheyalli.
I hope, I hv stepped in a wrong forum. All of u r here for time pass and nothing else. None of you knows watz happening der. You don't even try to think beyond. U just simply sit n type bla..blaa.blaa. And you are the so called Gr-1 aspirants. Grt!!!
@prerana, Manam gelichaamaa? Wat hpnd in the court? ee case tho nee pelli ki mudi pettaadante alaanti vaanni chesukoku.
@anil, what so special for g-1 aspirants? Do they have two?
Post a Comment